this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
66 points (97.1% liked)

Programming

17550 readers
171 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
66
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by canpolat to c/programming
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

My (least) favorite in this category is email addresses. It's astonishing how many developers screw this up by trying to validate an email address by some means other than sending a message to it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

100% agree.

™@tld
[email protected].
"user with spaces"@domain.tld
"user@notdomain"@domain.tld
[email protected]
[email protected]
unicodedomain@🤡.tld

All of those are valid, and the know-it-all developer's shitty regex won't cover most of them.

[–] eluvatar 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except lots of email services won't take a technically correct email anyway.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

"Systems that break email already exist, so let's add more to the world."

Please, no.

[–] mrkite 11 points 11 months ago

The problem is that if you send a message just blindly, you can be tricked into sending spam to millions of addresses. I do one thing that prevents that, but does violate the standard, I verify there's only 1 '@' in the address.. this technically prevents people with '@'s in their name, but they probably find it impossible to do anything with that address anyway.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's all reasonable stuff except maybe:

People’s names are all mapped in Unicode code points.

I don't see how you could avoid this this in software that needs to ask the user their name.

I think it's definitely a good idea to avoid using names wherever possible, and definitely don't try to do anything clever with them.

When necessary, software can just be clear:

  • "in unicode, what should I call you?"
  • "in unicode, who is making this credit card transaction?'
[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Users: "I don't speak unicode"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Haha, yeah, I didn't mean literally telling them that. More like giving them a text field that can only contain unicode characters, which is pretty standard.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Programmers: "\u{004A}\u{006F}\u{0068}\u{006E}"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

You can do that when you control the frontend UI. Then, you can set up the input field for their name, applying input validation.

But I would rather not rely on telling the user, in hopes they understand and comply. If they have ways to do it wrong, they will.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One of the all-time classics! I think all devs should read this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

It's solid but I've always preferred the similar list about date and time - some of the answers to this list are just "Yea, but what do you want us to call you."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago