this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
442 points (86.6% liked)

Memes

45519 readers
1340 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If a partner moved in with me they absolutely would help pay my mortgage. But I wouldn't lie that I didn't own the place. Just set standards of what I expect

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be serious, the bank owns the place until it's all paid off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then the government owns it after that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? Do you understand how homeownership works?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They aren’t wrong tho. If you stop paying your taxes they will take your house away. So in the end you may “own” it but you really don’t have full control, which raises the question on who really owns the land.

In the end the government has the control. Do you really own it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you don't pay your taxes and have any assets, will a court seize them if you refuse to pay? Sure. A private company can sue you if you don't pay for services and a court may also seize assets if you lose and refuse to pay. Do you own the assets?

Yes, obviously.

Hey guys, I found the anarchocapitalist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's what I'm doing with my SO. My house and my mortage but she pays about half of it though that includes also groceries, water and electricity

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the hell is up with some of these "memes"? This isn't funny

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Someone is dumping their entire Facebook meme backlog. Whole lotta boomer posting

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that he lied about owning property is gross, but if he had told her, why wouldn't she contribute to the monthly bills? She is occupying space.

Again not telling her is shady but if she could make an informed decision, paying rent to live in a house isn't crazy, even if one person is accruing long term value from the spend.

If it were me I'd obv tell her day 1, then offer a generous rent rate. The house is being worn down by 2, but you are gaining long term value (paying principle on the mortgage). She can't expect to live rent free, but you can't expect her to share the mortgage burden equally.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Because when they break up she has nothing and he has her money in the form of equity. Splitting consumption bills is obviously good, but splitting a mortgage where one party gets it all is far less cut and dry.

If that's all up front and she agrees then whatever but the scenario in the meme is pretty scummy

Replies filled with people that will hopefully never live with their girlfriends because they seem very satisfied with the idea of lording over a romantic partner.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Motherfucker that's called rent.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to say that the deception is shitty, but she'd be in the same situation as if she rented a place. It's a little out there to expect equity when all you did was cohabitate for a period, it's the exact same thing as renting a room or something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference is a rental agreement and generally people in relationships aren't expected to be in a landlord tenant situation. If this was just your friend then sure

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Well hang on, here's a scenario for you: Say I own a 2 bedroom condo, and have a roommate that I charge rent. One day, I meet a girl and we start dating. At some point, said roommate moves out, and it just happens that my gf and I are at the point where she moves in, and said 2nd room gets turned into a office or guest room, because obviously we're going to share the master. She pays me rent for living with me (might even be a lower amount for whatever reason). After two years, we decide to break it off since it isn't working between us and she moves out. Do you think I should be expected to pay her out a slice of equity? How is that any different than a roommate renting a room from a financial standpoint?

And in response to your other reply, what if she didn't contribute to repairs? I think my point here is where do we draw the line? I can understand if a partner makes a significant investment contribution to the property, but I don't know if I necessarily agree even with a certain length of time outside of marriage without a prenup, considering if y'all were renting somewhere you would have no claim to the property whatsoever. Just because someone is in a relationship with someone, in my mind, does not entitle them to another person's assets just because they were together.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Because when they break up she has nothing and he has her money in the form of equity. Splitting consumption bills is obviously good, but splitting a mortgage where one party gets it all is far less cut and dry.

The person renting (man or woman, if the situation was reversed on gender) has no responsibility for maintenance or liability to the house. If the renter is paying rent, they should also have no responsibility to pay for any house maintenance. Roof needs replacing? Homeowner pays, renter pays nothing. Fridge goes out? Homeowner pays, renter pays nothing. Mail carrier slips on ice and sues? Homeowner need to defend themselves, renter pays nothing. If the renter wants to break up and move to Alaska, renter can do exactly that with 30 days or less notice. Homeowner would need to go through all the trouble of evicting and selling the property to do the same.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My gf pays half the mortgage. She lives here. She uses everything. She helps with bills. This is a lot less expensive than if she were paying rent elsewhere.

She also didn't contribute to: new fridge, new kitchen floor (damage from old fridge), new bathroom ceiling (mold damage), new driveway, new garage, tree removal and trimming, new door (that broke when she failed to latch it in high wind), and all other house stuff.

asking half the mortgage when the burden of all the rest is on you is not asking a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We specifically split the interest portion of my mortgage. It changes every payment obviously, so we just rounded it and adjusted it every year or so.

5 years later we’re getting married, so it’s all moot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, if they're not married and he charged her rent, how's that much different than having a roommate? Why would she be entitled to ownership of the property just because she paid for a place to live, barring marriage or common law? There's something to be said about being up front about your financial situation sure, but how she could expect equity out of the arrangement is a little asinine, unless she helped pay for repairs and upkeep (aside from basic cleaning/chores).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's obviously all a made up scenario, but imo time is a significant factor here. If she lives there for three years then it's likely that she's helped with repairs etc, so imo should be entitled to equity in some respect.

Seems a bit shit to treat a partner like a roommate.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

This is supposed to be a meme?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s the expectation here? That you get to live for free because you’re banging a guy who owns a house? Alrighty.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My husband literally lives for free because 90% of our income comes from me. His money basically is just our food. So yeah, its unethical to charge your partner rent. Its really weird to view relationships as a business deal where you both give exactly 50 percent. That sounds like roommates who have sex.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Your husband.

That's commitment and with it comes a lot of decision, one of them whether to keep money separate, pool together or just have one account altogether.

But unless that commitment is made, expecting ither half to be responsible and pay for their shit - unless agreed otherwise beforehand - is to be expexted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

In the UK, she has some claim to shared equity.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Holy fucking oof.

Damn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Jesus christ

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Evryone missing the possibility that he owned it outright (no mortgage)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There is still taxes and maybe other stuff that the owner pays and the renter doesn't that he would have to cover but yeah I get your point.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›