this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
20 points (85.7% liked)

Programming

17537 readers
129 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Developers should only be given spec’d out tasks with detailed use cases and an explanation of exactly what should be done.

Yep, sounds like someone with 3 YOE alright. Perfectly reasonable perspective for someone at that stage of their career.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Detailed explanation of what should be done?

That assumes that the user and ever stakeholder knows what the problem is, how best to solve it, and what technical options exist to meet them.

Which is to say the mindset is “I’m a mechanic, tell me what to do” and not “I’m an engineer. Let’s see what the problem is and then figure out what the real underlying problem is”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol. Nice.

In my decades doing this, I can honestly say I enjoyedboth times that happened for me. It was nice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Twice? Nice!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

In my experience it does not go without saying that a project needs a goal. Not a list of acceptance criteria or next steps, but WHY are we doing what's being asked. It's staggering how many times I've seen entire projects without a clearly defined goal or problem statement, and after 3 months the work was shelved. Management simply shrugged it off as, "That's business for you -- targets move," when plenty of people on the front line were unsure what the point was and it would've taken a 10 min convo with the intended audience to learn that the feature was nowhere in their top 10 and they'll never use it.