this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
2448 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60060 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It had been in the works for a while, but now it has formally been adopted. From the article:

The regulation provides that by 2027 portable batteries incorporated into appliances should be removable and replaceable by the end-user, leaving sufficient time for operators to adapt the design of their products to this requirement.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I've seen a few comments about Bluetooth headphones and TWS earbuds but I don't think it's really too much of an issue. For over ear style headphones Steel Series have already proved the concept as they have a headset that has hot swappable rechargeable batteries. No reason other manufacturers can't design a fitted one that could be replaced.

As for TWS buds, so many of these must already be in landfill when the tiny batteries give out. We've already got rechargeable batteries for hearing aids that can be replaced by the user. I'm sure something similar could be achieved for TWS buds.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This is great news.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Sooo I totally get the appeal, but I actually don’t want removable batteries. Like the everyday benefit of a thinner, more water/dust proof phone is much useful to me than the annoyance of having to take my phone in to get serviced once every three to four years.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thickness and weight might have been a serious issue 10 years ago but batteries have reached such high energy densities that the additional volume/weight becomes negligible especially considering how thin most phones already are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I’m all for it, but how is this going to work with tiny things like AirPods? Currently the whole thing is packed with tiny batteries glued onto the electronics so that it can fit in your ears. How do you ever make that replaceable without making them huge?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The EU being the voice of reason once again. As someone who has kept his phone alive by swapping the battery (which, with its still probably too hard and involved for the average person even with an ifixit kit), I think we could cut back hugely on e-waste and save people a lot of money by enforcing swappable batteries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is great it's finally been adopted. Having read this though, I really wonder about some very small things like AirPods and other Ear Pods which are so small it would be difficult to engineer them to pop open without impacting the longevity ot the item. Maybe I'm wrong, it is just an interesting thought. Otherwise I am all for the right to repair your own stuff and cradle to cradle these things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

appliances should be removable

I see a "should" there instead of a "must". I assume this legislation will have teeth yeah?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Nice! Hope it goes all over the world soon.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›