this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Data Hoarder

0 readers
3 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

One day we’ll get thickkk ssds

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doubt it. 64TB SSDs are already here in a 2.5"-ish form factor (U.2/u.3/E3.S). 128TB are only a couple years out.

40TB HDDs will be competing with 2.5" 128TB SSDs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your optimism about SSD prices is IMHO unjustified.

NANDs are afaik still produced in 14-15nm so the only way they get more capacity is stacking multiple layers.

So even if they add more and more layers the price of these NANDs will run into a price/capacity wall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying anything about prices, just about available capacities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seriously I just wanna buy some 8TB NVMes for the same price as 4x2TB NVMes. Or give me a cheapo not premium flash 16TB SATA SSD, if an NVMe one just isn't doable.

Let us get beyond the 2TB SSDs!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

8TB in the M.2 NVMe form factor is gonna be tough, though 8TB in the U.2 form factor (PCIe to a 2.5" drive) can be had for $400 used / $550 new (search "Intel DC P4510 SSDPE2KX080T851").

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can already get new Samsung 8TB QLC in 2.5” SSD on Amazon for $300

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SATA != NVMe. The above Intel drive is NVMe, not SATA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm aware. The OP we're both responding to asked for SATA if not available for NVMe. $300 is cheaper than $400

Or give me a cheapo not premium flash 16TB SATA SSD, if an NVMe one just isn't doable.

Let us get beyond the 2TB SSDs!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Except he asked for a 8TB NVMe or a 16TB SATA. Is your $320 SATA drive 16TB? I was simply pointing out 8TB NVMe drives were available and not overly expensive.

I just wanna buy some 8TB NVMes for the same price as 4x2TB NVMes. Or give me a cheapo not premium flash 16TB SATA SSD, if an NVMe one just isn't doable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You can get an enterprise 7.68TB drive for $530: https://www.amazon.com/SOLIDIGM-D5-P5430-Solid-State-Drive/dp/B0C96FTCS3

It's a little more than 4x2TB but you get enterprise reliability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm partial to the long boi's (EDSFF long) they have in servers now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe those from Nimbus is your thing? Exadrive, baby!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here I am being a schmuck still getting 12TB drives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

and they're still too expensive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's nice and all but I'm not looking for denser storage, I want cheap storage. It feels like prices per TB has barely moved in the last decade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It costs nearly as much to make a 10tb drive as it does to make a 20. HDD's are already pushing far fewer units than they were a decade ago so their focus is on capacity to meet the needs of their biggest customer, the enterprise.

The only way you're going to get cheaper storage at this point is if they cut quality, nand prices fall drastically, or some new cheaper storage medium is discovered and scaled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seagate drives never let me down!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seagate's future looks uncertain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When looking at Seagate's description of the HAMR technology they state that "Each bit is heated and cools down in a nanosecond, so the HAMR laser has no impact at all on drive temperature, or on the temperature, stability, or reliability of the media overall" but I'm left wondering if I buy these drives as used when they get dumped after their 5 year enterprise life cycle then how much faith can I place on the "stability, or reliability of the media overall" after all that repeated heating? I'd be somewhat expecting more and more bad blocks to be cropping up with repeated use assuming it actually does degrade although I guess you could cope with it if you run something like ZFS Raid-Z2/Z3 stripes to deal with any problems as they occur.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

time to start lowering prices on hard drives

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Always stick with WD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Has anyone asked Western Digital what the status of MAMR drives is?