this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
682 points (100.0% liked)

196

16719 readers
2507 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omphalos_hypothesis

I love that. "GOD created them that way to FOOL the unbelievers! He also created the universe to appear older than it is, but we knows better!" The laws of time, space, reason, and logic bend to fit their narrative.

[–] GamesRevolution 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's the case god might as well have created everything last Thursday

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was last Tuesday you sauceless heretic!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Last Thursdayists are a schism of Last Tuesdayism, and believe the universe is remade every Thursday.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I kind of subscribed to that line of thought before my deconversion. That if we believe in a god with unlimited power, he has the power to create a universe that's already 13 billion years old. But if God did that, then he'd be presenting a 6,000 year old universe as a 13 billion year old one. And doing so would make him a liar. But God doesn't tell lies? And a god capable of lying is not a god worth following. But a god that is incapable of lying is limited in his abilities. And a god limited in his capabilities is not worth following.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why is a god simply being capable of lying not worth following? If he's capable and chooses not to, isn't that a better god than one who can't lie?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Well this god installed thirteen billion years of red-shifted light from the furthest visible stars. Last Tuesday.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, I sure do love it when our all-loving God does everything in his power to trick non-believers into further doubt so they burn in hell for eternity!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

What a swell guy

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

And God did all this last Tuesday.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nah god is definitely just an introvert who doesn't want us to know about him. Joke's on the thiests, they're gonna be eternally punished for not leaving him alone. Which is horrible--did I mention he's also an asshole? /s (/s because I don't believe in any god, to be clear)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will not stand for Lilith erasure

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

neither will I

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Not as funny as pictures of Jesus wearing a cross.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a theory, but I'm betting nobody truly wants to hear it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet it has something to do with Adam and Eve being fictional characters in the mythological texts of a bunch of hokey religions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then it's more of an imagining than a theory isn't it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I was the alien. I can confirm

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Humanoids already existed (think slightly more advanced Neanderthal types). Adam and Eve were both of these, but they were changed (flash of inspiration, touch of God, random mutation, take your pick) effectively elevated them above that level. (God evolved his Pokemon. LOL) So, while they were "created" as many and woman, they had a standard mammalian birth, and thus each have a bellybutton.

Just a hypothesis, nothing more. Do with it as you will.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

As an evolutionary biologist I promise you that this makes way more sense in your head than it makes in actual reality. This is not how evolution works.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well it’s a theory on divinity not evolution

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My point is that it makes no sense in the framework of reality and that you might as well go with the literal story of Adam and Eve or whatever mythology you want, because throwing Neanderthals into the mix does fuck all in terms of making anything believable. It’s literally as scientifically justified as the Norse creation myth about a giant cow licking salty ice to uncover the gods.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The closest thing scientifically that we'll ever come to Adam and Eve is probably Y-chromosomal Adam and Mitochondrial Eve

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

The labour was 7 days long. After that He invented the epidural.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

And yet when I think about it, it really doesn't seem that mad. If god is real and can make people he's certainly capable of making people with belly buttons.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was actually a 19th century guy who noticed this and made up a hypothesis that the reason we see so many signs of long-term natural development of Earth's features (canyons, mountains, etc.) is because God intentionally put fake evidence there, like he did with Adam and Eve's belly buttons. I think he named his book Omphalos, which means navel in Ancient Greek.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Interesting, instead of acceptance, simply invent another hypothesis to "confirm" the likely uncomfirmable.

I get the "scientific" method of it though.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

They were beta testing them, EZ

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

god must have hatched them from his vagina

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

At this point I'm kinda afraid to ask, but why the hell does nowadays almost every post title on Lemmy end with "rule"?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Not lemmy, /c/196.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s just the “196” community, which already existed on Reddit. From what I understood, the only rule is you have to post something before you leave, and put “rule” in the title. As for the reason, or why is it called like that, I’m not sure either.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

the titles are tradition but not a rule. it's called 196 because it's a descendent of 195. why was it called 195? 195 was created by a college student as a social experiment, and 195 was their room number. they shut down 195 when they graduated, so 196 was created

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"almost every post title on Lemmy".

I counted my feed and it was 2/30. Apparently that means "almost every" in 2023 lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The rule is that you have to post before you leave

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't the easy answer that God just created them that way?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The paintings? Nah, those were made by people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Well that's even easier to explain, people are flawed and do flawed representation

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Jesus Christ is caucasian on european paintings, so what?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

you know what's funny? not Charles Schulz

load more comments
view more: next ›