this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
104 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

60098 readers
1840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Marc Andreessen's "techno-optimist manifesto"

It has been thirty years. The Internet isn’t just the realm of the future anymore. It is also our present and has a substantial past. It is worth examining how the past promises of those 90s techno-optimists worked out.

They promised that technology would solve our environmental problems. And there has, just recently, been some real progress in clean tech. But the trend lines are somewhere between bad and cataclysmic. We do not inhabit the future they insisted they were building. For Andreessen, in 2023, to declare that “there is no material problem – whether created by nature or by technology – that cannot be solved with more technology” is an act of willful self-deception. Just how long are we supposed to clap-and-wait while Andreessen’s investment portfolio tries to science the shit out of the climate crisis?

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago

Simple. Because they don't want or need to. As long as they have their cancerous wealth nothing else matters.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

*they're overgrown spoiled brats

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

They aren't interested in innovation, they are interested in profit. Tech billionaires are not innovators, they are immoral businessmen. Jobs stole, Musk buys and squanders, Bezos buries - each for their own benefit with no care for whether the things they destroy will help others. You are looking to the wrong people for help in any of this - they aren't saviors they are parasites.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Billionaires can't really do anything. They're useless and barely human. They depend on society to take care of them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glib (though truthful) answers aside, I thought this was a good read. Thank you for posting it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed, it was an excellent read, especially for somebody that used to be a technological optimist, but is now disillusioned by the state Silicon Valley has left us in.

[–] hlfshell 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is extremely difficult to get someone to understand something which their paycheck depends upon them not understanding it.

The solutions that would work for climate change - dramatic reduction in consumption, recycling, large scale government regulation and oversight to ensure adoption of these policies - that doesn't make money. New technology does.

The deadliness of climate change extends not from its all encompassing effect, nor the monumental cataclysms it'll unleash, but instead that it's solution requires a complete rethinking of systems that make a select few very powerful people privileged in the first place.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

It's down (&up!) to us to teach them.

Internet runs on open source. Facebook, Google, Apple, twatter, Microsoft are all ways they've painted it, but the bare bones of the net is based on open source servers.

Open sourced communications are what need to be used, developed (fediverse seems like a nice collaboration of platforms, a restart). Back to Usenet! (Dunno...just spitballing here)

We need to focus on World Wealth rather than hoarding imaginary currencies.

My mind's eye of Wealthy Earth is a place where everyone is connected to, sustained by, developmental of, & grateful to our collective Earth ship that circles the sun for daily, yearly sustenance & inspirations.

Note to self: Learn to connect! Learn to grow! Learn to build. We don't need governments, corporations or boundaries to build a better planet. They're stop gap measures who's times are due. They've fostered disconnection, dependencies: we've been Stockholm syndrome capitalists for thousands of years. We don't need capital to connect with plants, fungii, & the billions of microbiomes within our own bodies and in our environments. We need ourselves & each other. We need to cultivate understanding & exchange with the Earth for foods, medications, shelters & toys (transportation, computer & other technologies to name a few). Anything done by corporations or governments was done by humans. We can do better with and without the greedy overlords by combining & collaborating knowledge & experience in pursuit of healthier, happier, balanced & creative life on Earth. Do it with gratitude.

I want to believe that we can each develop a connection that provides us with basic needs (food, shelter, medication, transportation & dress) and close or local communities that help grow those connections to fruition, as well as tend to greater aspirations & larger needs (computers, conversations, medical development).

Looking to RichardStallman& LinusTorvalds with gratitude for open source software bounties; Paul Stamets, Merlin Sheldrake & the brothers McKenna for reminders that decomposers provide composers with building blocks & insight. The grift of capital culture needs to be lichen-ized/myco-remediated. Their shit stinks & has too long poisoned the planet.

Grow, brew, build, & create better wherever you may be. This whole planet can regrow to be an Amazonian Eden - and beyond!