this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
83 points (95.6% liked)

Games

32945 readers
859 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are uses of AI that are proving to be more than black and white. While voice actors, have protested their performances being fed into AI against their will, we are now seeing an example of this being done, with permission, in a very unique case.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

With permission from the family. Not the owner of the voice, who can't speak for themselves anymore, obviously.

Whilst I think most people feel like this is the one exceptional case where we will be okay with this, I feel like every exec is seeing it, and the community reaction to it, and saying, "So it is possible".

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

And we get into why everyone is striking. We're all okay for normal use cases like this, but execs are like "we'll pay you for 3 hours of work, then build a model and then do 180 hours of voice from that model. And you'll say thank you for the opportunity"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wouldn't want my family to make decisions for me after I die, and I think that's even more true for actors.

"Can we use your grandpa's voice?"

"No."

"For fifty bucks?"

"Sure, take it"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, once you're dead nothing else really matters anymore, does it? You're not a person anymore, so why would your opinion matter? If my family can use my legacy to make money for themselves, I would just be happy knowing they'd be a bit better off once I'm gone. And if they choose to protect the right to use my voice/likeness after I'm gone, I'd prefer that they do so because of their own personal beliefs, not because they believe they have to do so for my sake.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It matters to society, in the same way funerary rituals aren't for the dead, but for the living

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who would you want to make decisions for you when you die then? Keeping in mind saying no is still a decision.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Nobody. I died, leave me alone and ask one of the thousand actors out there who are still breathing.

[–] coltorl 1 points 1 year ago

So include those conditions in the will. Famous people regularly allow the usage of their likeness licensed through their estate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like that answer is for you and you alone, and not for actors in general. Personally I don't really see why I would be worried about this after I die (after all, I'm dead ), and if it helps my family a bit then it'd probably just make me rest easier if anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well the person is dead anyway, it's not like dead people care in any way.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks 1 points 1 year ago

So all they have to do is kill somebody who won't give up their voice rights...