this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
278 points (98.6% liked)

Games

31990 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

AMD has made an oversight in implementing their new technology that poses a significant issue for Counter Strike 2 players who have opted to utilize AMD’s AntiLag+. Recently, AMD introduced a new 23.10.1 driver allowing players to access this technology in the game. However, it has now been confirmed that utilizing this technology can lead to a ban.

Despite Counter Strike 2 being launched just this month, it has already earned attention from all major GPU manufacturers, each offering dedicated graphics drivers. AMD’s most recent release introduced Anti-Lag+, an exclusive feature for the Radeon RX 7000 series, aimed at enhancing responsiveness by optimizing frame alignment within the game’s code.

It has been discovered that manipulating DLL functions with AMD’s technology could result in a VAC ban. Valve may consider lifting the bans only when AMD provides an update for this technology. Until that happens, it is recommended not to enable this technology in the game.

The Anti-Lag+ technology is an improved tech that only works on Radeon RX 7000 series and RDNA3 based products. The tech is available in multiple games but Counter Strike 2 is the only that has reported problems with implementation. The game also supports NVIDIA Reflex technology, but Unlike Anti-Lag+ which works on a driver level, Reflex is incorporated into the game itself.

Tweet from @CounterStrike:

"AMD's latest driver has made their "Anti-Lag/+" feature available for CS2, which is implemented by detouring engine dll functions.

If you are an AMD customer and play CS2, DO NOT ENABLE ANTI-LAG/+; any tampering with CS code will result in a VAC ban.

Once AMD ships an update we can do the work of identifying affected users and reversing their ban. @AMD"

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 134 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has been discovered that manipulating DLL functions with AMD’s technology could result in a VAC ban.

So actively altering game code can be misconstrued as trying to cheat. Well consider me fucking shocked.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Things like reshade and controller api modifcations redirect dll functions. The line is kind of vague about the specifics.

Should people on steamdeck ironically be banned for how proton changes how the DX11 is read and converts it to vulkan?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Should people on steamdeck ironically be banned for how proton changes how the DX11 is read and converts it to vulkan?

it's just converting the call that the game make to vulkan, it's different, it don't touch game code at all

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not exactly, its a dll conversion. You overtake the dll the game uses and replace it with a different library. Same idea with reshade. You bypass the dll given by the game to use your own.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Possibly not since Proton is Valve's thingy, but who knows.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And yet use of actual cheats doesn't result in VAC bans, and the game is in just as bad of a state as CS:GO, with most old cheats being easily ported over. Good fucking job...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even purely just a CS/Valve issue, which is the worst part. Anything that runs BattlEye struggles with rampant unpunished cheating, and yet they successfully ban anyone running legit systems, or software that has nothing to do with the game. Somehow it's only getting worse, because a bunch of new games are introducing Ring0 anticheats, that have access to way too much information, but still fail to do what they're designed to

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

still fail to do what they’re designed to

they were designed to create chinese botnet, and they will

«anti-cheat» is the same as «anti-terror» — a gift-paper wrapper

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It does results in bans of course but they sadly don't catch up with cheaters fast enough.... Or in some cases is difficult to catch on without the crazy anticheats we have seen complains about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's of course easier to ban something that modifies game files without hiding it, than it is to ban something that tries its very best to hide its very existence.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It sucks but I mean, the game is basically a sport now. I get the necessity.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Professional players should all be using the same hardware and software configuration

VAC is to keep the game fun for more casual players

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Professional players should all be using the same hardware and software configuration

This would be a serious challenge in real-life and basically impossible online.
You're bound to encounter minor model differences unless you spend dramatically more on hardware.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean… professionals always have to spend dramatically more on hardware…

There are rules around the engines and bodies f1 and nascar drivers can use, there are rules around what shoes runners can use…

A slimmed down operating system on a specific hardware configuration isn’t unreasonable

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

F1 is still largely a pay2win affair with clear competitive advantages for having a bigger budget so not a good a comparison IMO.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s sort of my original point - bringing VAC into the discussion of “it’s a sport” isn’t very meaningful

VAC has never, and will never, had an affect professional esports

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The worlds greatest cs2 player may live in a 3rd world country and never been able to afford a PC

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I see what you're saying but you're comparing $500-1500 for a PC to the millions of dollars you need to even prototype an F1 car, let alone transport and race it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Much more limited these days. F1 teams all have to stay within a budget cap these days, and while the top ones are still benefitting from the money they poured into R&D before the caps, ongoing investment is much more limited.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd buy in to that. You could even do it the way NASCAR does it: here are the specs. You can buy it from us to guarantee you are in compliance, or if you're good enough to replicate this setup you can use your own, but we'll tear down your setup to inspect after every contest. The only changes allowed are peripherals

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Irl professionals dont use their own pc. They use a pc provided to them, and their own accessories thats tested before hand for any suspicious modifications.

Online of course is unenforcable

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Real sports let you change the source code

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Basketball

Hockey

Are all open source; it’s not that esports aren’t sports. It’s just most are advertisements not sports

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not a great argument. Real sports don't let you change which rules you play by while others are still using the normal rules.

What you described is more like making your own league.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you think open source is?

If you’re using a modified version of something then you need other people using it too

Code is rules

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

AMD when injecting code into a game triggers the anticheat

suprised

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The game also supports NVIDIA Reflex technology, but Unlike Anti-Lag+ which works on a driver level, Reflex is incorporated into the game itself.

This shows how Nvidia's size and money allow it to improve its market position without necessarily having better tech. They may sign deals with game developers to implement Nvidia-exclusive features rather than have to tamper with DLLs and such.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's fucked, imagine having no idea, enabling it and being banned from a game you've been playing for years because of something your graphics card manufacturer suggested.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely Valve is reversing these? I'd be pretty pissed.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read the last line of the quoted tweet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It appears that I have made a mistake.