this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
176 points (93.1% liked)

News

22890 readers
3630 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Terrorism is a loaded word, which people use about an outfit they disapprove of morally. It's simply not the BBC's job to tell people who to support and who to condemn - who are the good guys and who are the bad guys.

We regularly point out that the British and other governments have condemned Hamas as a terrorist organisation, but that's their business. We also run interviews with guests and quote contributors who describe Hamas as terrorists.

The key point is that we don't say it in our voice. Our business is to present our audiences with the facts, and let them make up their own minds.

As it happens, of course, many of the people who've attacked us for not using the word terrorist have seen our pictures, heard our audio or read our stories, and made up their minds on the basis of our reporting, so it's not as though we're hiding the truth in any way - far from it.

Any reasonable person would be appalled by the kind of thing we've seen. It's perfectly reasonable to call the incidents that have occurred "atrocities", because that's exactly what they are.

No-one can possibly defend the murder of civilians, especially children and even babies - nor attacks on innocent, peace-loving people who are attending a music festival.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Both sides are religious fanatics. But people don't like it when you state the truth about their side.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Religion is the excuse. Very rarely are conflicts actually driven by religious differences. Most of the time it's just plain power-hungry people trying to gain power over another group, seize land, gain wealth, etc. Religion is great for galvanizing the masses, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Religion is also the means. Are you an ancient Egyptian ruler, who is fed up with having to deal and align with all the temples? Just introduce monotheism, insist you are sent by god, and voila: almost unlimited power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Just introduce monotheism, insist you are sent by god, and voila: almost unlimited power.

Well about that...

As a pharaoh, Akhenaten is noted for abandoning Egypt's traditional polytheism and introducing Atenism, or worship centered around Aten. ... This culture shift away from traditional religion was reversed after his death. Akhenaten's monuments were dismantled and hidden, his statues were destroyed, and his name excluded from lists of rulers compiled by later pharaohs.[16]

It's hard to say whys on stuff that old, but a lot of historians consider this to be a move that was or became vastly unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Nah, Hamas are religious fanatics but the Israeli govt are Nationalist fanatics, they lean more on the ethnic identity of judaism than the religious identity. Might not seem like a big difference but apparently Israel's founders almost fought a civil war over this so probably worth remembering lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"My version of Winnie the Pooh has a bigger dick than yours!"

"I'll kill you for believing that!"

sigh...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have always admired the BBC for this.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Almost all journalism outlets have similar policies.

Which leads conspiracy theory types to latch on and post things like "the CBC/BBC wont condemn hamas as terrorists! The mainstream media sucks!", when in fact these policies have been in place fpr decades

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lots of MSM corps don't have that same self-control tho.

Actually neither do politicians.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, most MSM does have that self-control in their journalism. However, it's pretty common in MSM to spend a large proportion of their airtime and pages on opinions, where they do not have journalistic standards to uphold.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

wow. I just realised that MSM means mainstream media. I thought some how it was relayed to the old messenger or something.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, terrorism does have a meaning, beyond just being something any government is going to call a rebellious armed group, what else are you supposed to call a group or individual whose actions are intentionally designed to provoke fear in order to further their goals, to distinguish them from a similar non-state armed group that doesn't use that strategy?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Then Id like the 'settelers' who engage in terror campaigns using extrajudicial beatings and killings to also be called terrorists by the media, but that's never going to happen so this is a fine compromise.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What does compromise have to do with truth? If someone is committing an act of terrorism they are a terrorist, regardless of how righteous or awful their cause. Regardless if it is government backed or rebel backed. It is the action and the intent that matters.

If a settler commits an act of terrorism they are a terrorist. If a Hamas person commits an act of terrorism they are a terrorist. If little old lady with a old tabby cat, 9 grandchildren, and spends her weekends helping at food bank commits an act of terrorism she is a terrorist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does compromise have to do with truth?

Im just asking the media to be consistent in their logic and labeling. What does the media have to do with the truth?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Not going to argue with you there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But is their goal terror for a political purpose? I thought they were just going in and taking land and doing slow genocide. That isn’t terrorism (I mean, it’s worse), it’s a different thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Is driving Palestinians out of their homes for the crime of being Palestinian in order to assign their land not political? Its seems pretty close to ethnic cleansing, remove the Palestinian, implant the Jew, repeat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No, it’s not political. It has a political element, but so does basically everything. Which would render the word “terrorism” useless.

The main goal of annexation isn’t politics. It’s theft. The Palestinians have a thing the Israelis want (land) and the Israelis are stealing it. That’s conquest, and genocide, not terrorism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe we should reserve the term genocide for the act of trying to kill/destroy a population. Israel is doing horrible things to bully the Palestinians to leave, but they're certainly not trying to exterminate them

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bold take that a conquest between two states is not political.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So all war, ever, including defensive war, is terrorism? Not super useful.

There are multiple definitions of political, and you’re using the least useful one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

All war is political, dont shift the goalposts. Non state entities (settlers in this case) doing acts of war on specific ethnic populations is political terror.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

Respect to BBC for doing this.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago

Somebody’s going to get the sack for this