this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
302 points (95.2% liked)

News

23014 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Hockey League (NHL), the highest-level professional ice hockey league representing 32 North American teams, has banned individual players from wrapping their hockey sticks with rainbow-colored Pride Tape during warm-ups, games, and practices.

The new prohibition is just the latest development in the NHL’s rollback of its LGBTQ+ support amid a wave of anti-queer blowback to companies that support queer Pride. The prohibition flies in the face of the league’s LGBTQ+-inclusive Hockey is for Everyone campaign.

Last Thursday, the NHL issued a memo to all teams with “clarification” on its June decision to ban players from wearing Pride-themed warm-up jerseys during the teams’ LGBTQ+-inclusive Pride nights. The ban also prevents players from wearing jerseys commemorating military veterans, people with cancer, and others.

The new memo said, in part, “Players shall not be put in the position of having to demonstrate (or where they may be appearing to demonstrate) personal support for any Special Initiatives. A factor that may be considered in this regard includes, for example, whether a Player (or Players) is required to be in close proximity to any groups or individuals visibly or otherwise clearly associated with such Special Initiative(s).”

The broadly written “clarification” could technically mean that players could refuse to be on the ice if there is a drag queen, a gay men’s chorus singing the National Anthem, or even out gay players present, the LGBTQ+ sports website Outsports noted.

The aforementioned website also confirmed that the NHL has banned individual players from applying Pride Tape onto their hockey sticks. Proceeds from the sale of the rainbow-colored tape have gone towards LGBTQ+ youth outreach and educational initiatives, Pride Tape’s website states.

Queerty noted that the Thursday memo specified that “specialty jerseys may be sold as merchandise, they just can’t be on the ice,” meaning that “the NHL is still happy to take LGBTQ+ fans’ money. But won’t stand up for them in the face of a few homophobes.”

Last June, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman talked to Sportsnet about the rainbow-colored jerseys and how some players have refused to wear them.

“It’s become a distraction,” Bettman said. “And taking away from the fact that all of our clubs host nights in honor of various groups or causes, and we’d rather they continue to get the appropriate attention they deserve and not be a distraction.”

Bettman’s “distraction” comment may reference instances like what happened last January when Philadelphia Flyers’ player Ivan Provorov refused to take part in his team’s Pride Night warm-up session because he didn’t want to wear a rainbow-colored jersey. He said the jersey violated his Russian Orthodox Christian beliefs.

Bettman noted that NHL teams will still host Pride nights; players just won’t wear rainbow-colored jerseys during those nights. In a statement against the jersey ban, You Can Play, an organization opposing queerphobia in sports, said that they were “concerned and disappointed” by the new policy.

“Today’s decision means that the over 95% of players who chose to wear a Pride jersey to support the community will now not get an opportunity to do so. Pride nights will continue and we look forward to further enhancing the programming these opportunities bring to the mission of inclusion and belonging for the 2SLGBTQ+ community given this restriction,” the organization said.

This past Pride season, queerphobic conservative activists orchestrated boycotts of Target and Bud Light for including the LGBTQ+ community in their marketing. These activists admitted that their goal is to make Pride “toxic” to brands. If the NHL is any indication, that campaign is working.

Outsports added, ” The NHL was one of only two major pro sports leagues in North America to never change their X avatar to a rainbow during 2023’s Pride Month (the other was the NFL).”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 132 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Common Bettman L.

Dude really just said fuck it, I am gonna die of old age in 10 years anyway, fuck the future.

Now the NHL has banned pro-LGBTQ messaging, there are animated digital board ads during play, ads on helmets, ads on jerseys, gambling commercials, commentators talking about betting odds, embedded commercials during play, and still no reasonable means of legally streaming NHL games. All under Bettman's watch.

Gary needs to go.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, I haven't watched NHL in years (because, as you said, I can't). I had no idea it had gotten that bad.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's my favorite sport. Watching it die like this is killing me.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Best sport. Worst league.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sport isn't dying, just the (appearance of) its soul. I watched the NFL do the same kinds of things until I couldn't take any more. It sucks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The NHL is losing to soccer for 4th most popular sport, where it was competitive with basketball 30 years ago. The game is dying outside Canada.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was competitive with basketball 30 years ago

Bettman supporters keep saying how much the revenue has grown under his leadership while conveniently forgetting that every other league has grown its revenue faster than the NHL. As you say, the NHL used to be competitive with the NBA, and in fact, had higher overall revenue 30 years ago.

Bettman hid most of his underperforming league revenue by expanding the league. The new teams didn't perform well, but they boosted overall revenue enough to let Bettman keep his job. Now we're left with a league where 6-8 teams should die in order to improve overall league health. It's unlikely that Bettman or any future commissioner will admit how massive the problem is, so we'll just get teams that are always threatening to become bankrupt, dragging down the rest of the league.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

so we’ll just get teams that are always threatening to become bankrupt, dragging down the rest of the league.

At this rate I wouldn't be surprised if by the 2024-2025 season Arizona's gonna be splitting rink time with beer leaguers.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh so HE'S why I can't watch the only professional sport I actually like. Fuck that guy. All my homies hate that guy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If you happen to be an out of market fan, espn+ gives you most the games. In market you're pretty screwed, especially if your team gets a lot of national broadcasts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But like, why does it fucking matter? If I were a player, I'd still rock the pride jersey and tape in the face of the ban. "oH yOu NeEd To RePrEsEnT tHe CoMpAnY!"

Fuck you and your hateful bullshit. I'll show my support even though you won't.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Really there is only like 10 players that need to say fuck it and not follow this to force Bettmans hand. If Crosby, McDavid, Matthews, or a handful of other players of their popularity and caliber use the tape during warm-ups or singing like that it really puts pressure on the NHL to fold.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

Sexual assault is rampant but what really matters is clamping down on inclusivity!

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whoever made this decision needs their teeth knocked out. If they're already knocked out, they need to be given implants just so they can be knocked out again.

They're perfectly fine with selling you rainbow merch, but having some rainbow tape on a player's stick is "distracting?" To whom? Fucking dickheads.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a Canadian who doesn't pay much attention to hockey (yeah I know), but fuck this decision. Everyone should be for inclusive rights to all members of society who respect others. No ands ifs or buts. Fuck people who don't agree, it's not in your face it's just people wanting to be treated as equals you fuckers. I'd say heaven forbid we welcome different people but that's already in the bible, not that these people read it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

it's not in your face

That is exactly what conservatives argue.

"I'm fine with those people, but why do you have to shove it in my face?!"

They truly believe that any gay symbolism is pushy. They're coming from a time and place where gays were stuffed in the closet. Might be hard for young people to understand, but being gay was kept on the down low. Hell, "fag bashing" was a popular sport in the 80's. Don't want your ass beat? Fine. Keep that shit hidden and we're cool.

Had a high school buddy of mine about piss himself when I saw him in a straight/gay bar. "Please don't tell anybody!" "Don't give a shit. Let me hit whatever that is you got going."

Same bar, I was watching my gf dance and a guy pulled up, offered me a drink. "That'd be cool, but just so you know, I'm not gay." He knocked his barstool over running backwards. "Hey man! I'm sorry! It's cool!" "I'm cool. Can I still get that drink?" LOL, if you think gays have it bad now, you ain't seen shit.

Even "openly" gay stars like Liberace and Elton John were just "light in the loafers". No one called them gay. That was an insult beyond the pale.

And y'all can rage and shit yourselves in the comments for all I care, call me some sort of vile apologist, don't give a fuck. I'm just outlining how it was then vs. how it is now.

Some people's brains are literally incapable of adjusting to change. And some people don't think the changes are happening fast enough. And here we are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

being gay was kept on the down low

Not just on the down low, you could get beaten or even jailed for coming out as gay before.

It was literally illegal to be interested in men when you were a man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They truly believe that any gay symbolism is pushy.

It is in your face, especially during pride month. But that's the point. It's in your face so we can talk about how gay people are treated, what they've overcome, and show that they are being included in places they previously weren't. You can't do that if it's not in your face.

So, they've got a point when they claim that gay symbolism is pushy. I'd ask them why they think it's useful to be pushy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No one should have to support a political ideology they do not in fact support.

No one.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

the laaand of the free except you and you and you, maybe you..actually no

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, I can't boycott that garbage any more than I already do.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Spineless jellyfish

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess no Jesus shirts either? Fair is fair!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it says that in the article.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Sweet, no more cross necklaces!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Clear out the bigots and kremlin shills and fire Bettman immediately.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

So, could a specific line each pick 2-3 colors- individually, not a rainbow- to create a rainbow? Or a goalie with different colors on indiviual pads?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I'm looking forward to seeing which players defy this.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The new memo said, in part, “Players shall not be put in the position of having to demonstrate (or where they may be appearing to demonstrate) personal support for any Special Initiatives. A factor that may be considered in this regard includes, for example, whether a Player (or Players) is required to be in close proximity to any groups or individuals visibly or otherwise clearly associated with such Special Initiative(s).”

Wait so their excuse is to protect the bigots who don't want to participate, so their solution is to ban it all...? What?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

"All players will celebrate diversity the way we tell them to, when we tell them to. Non-conformity will not be tolerated."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd colour my hair in rainbow and take off the helmet after each match

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Go full Rodman!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Make red, blue and white the new LGBT colors. Things will get funny.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

But they can have sponsors plastered all over the arena for companies that are evil. Need a forward thinking company demand they put their logo with a pride flag on it. But those kinds of companies don't sponsor sports usually. It's always beer and beer companies are bitches.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

God I fucking hate Bettman.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I can understand allowing a player to not use it but banning for all is too much.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, this is really getting bad for the nhl. I understand walking back on pride nights and forcing players to wear jerseys, some have legitimate concerns of their home country causing trouble for them or their families. This is more like cowardice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Players shall not be put in the position of having to demonstrate (or where they may be appearing to demonstrate) personal support for any Special Initiatives.

That seems reasonable.

A factor that may be considered in this regard includes, for example, whether a Player (or Players) is required to be in close proximity to any groups or individuals visibly or otherwise clearly associated with such Special Initiative(s).

This seems stupid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then he says:

“It’s become a distraction,” Bettman said. “And taking away from the fact that all of our clubs host nights in honor of various groups or causes, and we’d rather they continue to get the appropriate attention they deserve and not be a distraction.”

I wonder if those rules will apply for players who refuse to participate in any other themed night for any other reason? Or will it just be for Pride Nights?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

League wastes their time on stuff like this and doesn’t address blackouts that actually affect fans. Priorities!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not like I need more reasons to just boycott and ignore the NHL, but here is yet another one.

Fuck you Gary Bettman, you've done nothing but siphon CAN $$$ into the US and ruin the game.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Super important stuff there Gary

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

How progressive of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Anyone who knows hockey guys knows that while there are definitely good ones, most of them are huge pieces of shit

load more comments
view more: next ›