this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
120 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lasers Could Soon Power U.S. Military Bases—And Not Even Jamming Could Stop It::We spoke to the project manager for DARPA’s POWER program, who explains how the wireless energy transfer technology will work.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"could"

"Soon"

Meaning, this is never going to happen.

Sure, it's possible to send power through the air - that much is already known. Sending significant levels of power over long distances is a whole other matter

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Aka every article in popular mechanics

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

and not even jamming could stop it, but clouds could

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weather control device detected

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
WARNING: Chronosphere activated!
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our base is under attack

Unit lost

Low power

Unit lost

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unit Ready
Unit Ready
Unit Ready

Construction complete

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You must construct additional pylons

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Or anything reflective. Throw some strips of tinfoil at it (that's just chaff WW2 style) and it not only disrupts power it has a good chance of blinding a few of the troops on the ground too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But what powers the lasers? Is it the jam? Does the jam power the lasers?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s only one man who would DARE give me the raspberry

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

*pulls down visor*

Lonestar!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

*zooming camera crashes into visor*

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sharks.. sharks power the lasers

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the end user converts that laser energy back into electricity using narrow-bandgap-tuned monochromatic photovoltaics

Is this specialized photovoltaic panels already exist or need to be invented first?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, photovoltaic panels are already only good at converting a specific range of wavelengths of light into energy. If you want to build more efficient panels (for normal uses), you often need to layer them, with different layers able to use different ranges of the spectrum.

Lasers (and LEDs for that matter) only produce a single wavelength of light, so there is some potential for using it to transmit energy. You just need to tune your laser and your panel to be on the same wavelength. So there's some tuning that needs to happen, but it's basically traditional photovoltaics we're talking about.

Although even then, I'm not sure what the theoretical maximum efficiency of these panels would be, there would probably still be a lot of energy loss. AND ALSO, I have some serious concerns with giving the military giant space based lasers strong enough to power a military base, that's generally called a death ray.

Somehow, I'm actually more comfortable with the military having small nuclear reactors...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Somehow, I'm actually more comfortable with the military having small nuclear reactors

Good, cuz they've had them for years on submarines and maybe some boats too lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any way to view the article without signing up and paying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This gadget was the plot macguffin of the G.I. Joe movie from 1987.