this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
313 points (95.9% liked)

World News

38705 readers
5 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a high for artillery!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The leopards, challengers, and abrams are doing their thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm very curious to see if the Pentagon goes ahead with the Abrams X after this war. They were already basically being forced into it, but this war is testing a whole new generation of anti-armor technology.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're almost certainly going with something from the Abrams X. The X is for experimental. It's testing to see how it works all together. Things will change in the final version. The hybrid bit will almost certainly happen. That tank is loud. If it can operate in silence, that's a big tactical advantage. I imagine thermals must be significantly better in battery mode too. The biggest issue is how much vulnerability does it require adding? I imagine it's not too bad, especially with the added stealth, but I have no idea.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also a large assumption but they have to trade the weight of the hybrid system for something. They can't just keep adding weight to an already overweight system

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They may. Idk. The electric motor can be used to add a lot of torque from a standstill, so it may be fine. I really don't know how much weight, as a percentage, the batteries will add compared to all the armor it already has. The hybrid system will improve efficiency though (imagine how much regenerative breaking will return with that beast of a machine stopping), so offsetting some of the weight with a smaller fuel tank may be viable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either that or find a smaller or more efficient fuel motor (turbine?) to save the weight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They are already using a (relatively) very compact gas turbine on the standard Abrams.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

If those Russian barbarians didn't want to die they'd fuck off out of Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

40 artillery systems is a lot of coverage. Holy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's a good start

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

must be trash day

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Quite the feat over the past day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hoping this insanity ends and that the invader goes home soon..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder what are «artillery systems», are hand-transportable mortars in that category?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since they're russian artillery systems that category also includes bottle rockets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

fair enough.