this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
626 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

6019 readers
578 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @[email protected]

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived

Great Britain, France, Germany and the United States have lifted restrictions on the types of weapons that can be supplied to Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on May 26. (video)

The move clears the way for the EU to send its most powerful and long-range missiles to Kyiv that can strike targets deep inside Russian territory, something the allies have been reluctant to do for fears of escalating tensions with the Kremlin and possibly provoking a direct clash between Russia and Nato countries in Europe.

"There are no longer any range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine, not from the British, not from the French, not from us, not from the Americans either. This means that Ukraine can now also defend itself by attacking military positions in Russia, for example,” Merz said during an interview on German television. β€œIt couldn't do that until some time ago, and with very few exceptions, it didn't do that until some time ago. Now it can. In jargon, we call this long-range fire, i.e., equipping Ukraine with weapons that attack military targets in the rear.”

The decision comes the day after Russia launched a devastating missile and drone barrage on Ukraine over the weekend of May 23-25 that largely targeted civilian targets in Kyiv and many other urban centres in Ukraine – amongst the largest attacks since the war started over three years ago.

...

The decision also clears the way for Germany to deliver its powerful Taurus cruise missiles that Kyiv had been asking for, but Berlin had so far been reluctant to supply. Merz didn’t mention the Taurus missiles by name during his interview, but has suggested that unlike former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, he was not against supplying Kyiv with the missile, which can hit Russian targets deep in the rear or could destroy the Kerch bridge connecting Russia to the Crimean peninsula.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Deep inside. They should reduce putins homes to rubble. That shitbird keeps hitting civilian targets. It seems like striking his home and the homes of other russian thugs would be nightmare fuel for them and make them lose the will to fight. After all that is what they think killing all those children will do to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I hope Ukraine gets mostly bunker buster missiles for high value targets.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Target the rich, spare the poor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Yup, target the guilty which is the rich in this case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean it’s not even a secret anymore that huge palace he built for himself on the Black Sea- makes a nice juicy target for a barrage of cruise missles

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (19 children)

The Moscow middle class are about to get a very real taste of the war.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not quite, unfortunately.. these cruise missiles don’t have the range to cover the distance to Moscow. Perhaps another exploratory excursion into the Kursk region might be necessary?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Slava Ukraine! Strike hard, strike deep, and let 'em feel the burn.

[–] anzo 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Am I the only one surprised to see the USians supporting this? In spite of Trump. Just great!

If anyone can share details on this.. It would be very welcome

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Trump probably doesn't understand what it means

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

IF Trump is mentally competent enough to know what it means then something probably happened in private between Trump and Putin. Both the old men are aggressive and senile so it's difficult to say what exactly. Maybe Putin dropped the bombshell statement that he wants to be in charge of the USA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe Putin dropped the bombshell statement that he wants to be in charge of the USA.

It would be interesting to see how the MAGA mob responded to that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Good hunting, I assume they know the location of more than one dacha belonging to Vlad

Slava Ukraini

[–] [email protected] 126 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They should have done this a year ago, though now’s the second best time.

I hope this announcement means that the Taurus missiles are already in Ukrainian hands, and ideally one of them is rapidly approaching a high-value target that has hitherto been considered safe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

The concept was very clearly to slowly push Putin red line, let him walk it back a little, rince and repeat. Because like it or not, Putin has nuclear weapons and that's enough of a threat to not take the risk of skipping steps up the escalation ladder.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They should have done it at the start of the conflict

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago

Or admitted Ukraine to NATO the first time Putler started making expansionist noises towards it.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck 'em up

This is pretty much always the result of widespread bombardment of civilian cities. It seems like it would result in people suing for peace, and if you have a certain type of psychopathic version of how to interact, it seems for that reason like it would be a good idea. But it just doesn't work. Even if you kill a huge fraction of people in the country and reduce a bunch of their cities to rubble, what they want to do is fuck you up even worse in retaliation, not suddenly become submissive and hope you will stop.

Ukraine's not even retaliating in kind, just hitting military and strategic targets inside Russia. Anyway. Fuck 'em up.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It would be pleasant to hear that the multi billion dollar mansion where putin sometimes resides cops a decent amount of "rain". With him in it at the time would be the icing on the cake.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was just wondering to myself how long the West intended to just eat Russia's shit when it comes to this constant disinformation undermining the integrity of their states before they would stop playing by the rules even the tiniest little bit. Unless every single Western leader is compromised it just didn't make sense - and that level of compromise just didn't seem likely. Maybe this is it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think it's more about keeping Putler away from the nuke button. The West can easily take Russia. But Putler is an evil man who might prefer a burning world over defeat.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Xi has actually been the one slapping Putin's wrist whenever the Russian dictator makes threats with nukes, even if the threats are empty. With three years of empty repetitive threats and Xi leashing Putin about it, this may have emboldened the West to finally allow Ukraine deep strikes and thinking to themselves "aww..the dog is all bark after all."

Although on the one hand, some countries are still reliant on Russian gas and oil imports and receive them in stealthy ways. So the other motivation is not just fear of nukes, but also the possibility of economic paralysis if oil and gas supplies are affected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Winning a nuclear war is unfortunately still losing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Mr. Zelenskyy, remember to send one to the White House with a thank you note.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Excellent! I'm genuinely looking forward reading all about international terrorist Putin's inevitable blind date with a cruise missile.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's see if this forces the Russians to negotiate in good faith. Either way, now the ukrainians can fight better

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Good faith and Russia don't ever belong in the same sentence. They only understand superior armaments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It'd be really nice if the US could decide which side they were on. Obviously we don't really want them to be on the side of Russia but this flip-flopping is confusing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I personally think that the U.S. is at moment a subsidiary of Donald Trump & Silicon Valley Enterprise LLC. Could be wrong, of course, that's just an opinion formed out of the news in recent months.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Finally. But what's been going on in Russia isn't making sense either.

Consider: Some estimates show Russia used 69 missiles and 298 drones between May 23-25.

Googling, "How much does a Russian drone cost?" gives: The cost of Russian drones varies significantly depending on the type and capabilities. Some cheaper drones like the "Ghoul" quadcopter cost as little as $500, while others, like the Shahed-136, are estimated to range from $20,000 to $80,000. More advanced drones, such as the Merlin-VR, can cost over $300,000

So let's say they used a mid-range drone, call it $30,000. 298 of them is $8,940,000.

Google again, "How much does a Russian missile used against Ukraine cost?". Lots of variation, but call it $500,000 for each of the 69 used, for a total of $34,500,000.

So, for this two-day attack, they spent about $43-44 million dollars. And Google again, "How many people were killed in Ukraine May 23-25" says, "at least 12".

Twelve people killed for $44 million. How stupid can you get? Do the Russians realize they could have simply bought the land they want in the Ukraine, if they'd done so through a dummy corporation or something like that?

I realize it's the whole, "terror" thing, but frankly Ukraine ain't terrified.

And now they're going to be really well armed, and off the chain.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Thinking about this in terms of money spent is the wrong mindset. That 44 million dollars went from the hands of one Russian into the hands of another. And it even counts towards their GDP. On the other side, 12 Ukrainians are dead. Think about that. Depopulation, especially of working aged people is what's really going to hurt your economy, not spending money on weapons.

As a sidenote, politicians often want you to believe that you can't have nice things because "there isn't enough money". That is just bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Excellent points. While on the outside it does look like the Russians could have bought out all of Eastern Ukraine's homeowners/farmers/citizens for $1 mil apiece, spent less money and still got the territory they want, it isn't that simple.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The war never made economic sense. Russia was well off before, with a huge reserve. It could have invested in its own people. But it did not.

Even the second most important city of Russia, St Petersburg, is in shit ruins with infrastructure falling apart.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

giving what was lost in 1994 to ukraine too?,

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί