this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
128 points (93.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1174 readers
179 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not OP, but from the timeline it seems legit.

Timeline:

  1. OP posts comment
  2. Mod removes comment with no reason
  3. Mod post the exact same comment that was removed
  4. OP complains and shows a screenshot.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/38365398/18703582

https://archive.is/l9kQN

Edit: User says there was a reason-

My comment was similar to Stupes.

The reason for it being deleted was the same as his reply to Stupe

That means the mod removed the post because it was similar to an entirely different user and then posts the same thing as the user's comment that was removed, 15 minutes later.

I don't understand the why of this? I've seen him be great, what is the point of all this.

EDIT 2: This seems to be my mistake or OP was fibbing. Regardless, still a little weird, but feel free to go after me if you feel necessary. I apologize for the drama.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This is so dumb I want to chalk it up to a mistake but I can’t think of how it could be. Puzzling. Will give @[email protected] a chance to explain before casting judgement.

Edit: I believe this is a misunderstanding of the situation. Here’s the original comment, which was not what Jordan then posted. It may have been removed by mistake.

Always post the modlog folks!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, not sure what happened there. I saw two users making the same comment, replied to one then was in the process of copy/pasting the reply to the other and the comment had already been removed.

I figured "🤷‍♂️ I guess they saw the other comment and removed it" and went on with my day. Wasn't aware of the drama until I saw the other replies.

I restored the post with commentary, not quite sure how it all happened.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Thank you for clarifying

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You removed the post instead of replying and put your intended reply in the removal reason.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

That's the way it got recorded, but like I say, that's not what my intention was.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

That was the first comment, not the second. You're mistaken on what is happening.

Also, why did he post the exact same thing and not just restore the guy's comment?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I am no fan of jordanlund but this seems like an actual mistake. He did remove the comment with the apparently intended reply text and has since restored the original post.

The whole thing makes it look like jordanlund is incompetent because he couldn't tell the difference between a reply and a removal reason. Maybe they look the same, I dunno because I don't mod anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That comment isn't the one removed from what I can tell. That's an entirely different comment. That's why I think you're mistaken. The one you're showing was already restored when I made this post.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Only one of the two similar comments was removed, and it was Darkard's.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then show us the one that was removed. You can also go into the modlogs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

I'm obviously wrong here, maybe misguided. I checked the logs through his name and you're correct. I did see that exact comment though. It's all very strange.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Give me the modlog entry for the second comment. As seen in the screenshot the reply the mod posted was put as the reason for removing the comment ('for the following reason: "They wouldn't have..."'); that wasn't the content of the comment. Check the modlog and see for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FYI, I did check the modlog. I think they have a holding pattern for a few hours on their logs or something and now let them through. It seems to be the case on this community as well since I see someone's comment was removed and they were banned but you can't see the log.

You're right, that was the reason and I misunderstood or OP was fibbing on what really happened.

I will say this, there was still no reason for them to remove a similar comment, but that's my opinion and I'm not a mod there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you filter for moderation actions upon Darkard, you'll find a moderation action for ~50 minutes ago that restores the same comment that was deleted with "? bogus removal?". People who are mods can also see that the restoration was also committed by jordanlund.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

As I said, I checked the modlog, but didn't check his specifically. I didn't realize that was an option.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It was restored once they realized what happened.

I didn’t see any other comment removals in the modlog. Posting the modlog is a rule here for a reason. If my understanding is incorrect then you need to prove that in a way that can be verified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I saw he restored it because he's noping out, lol.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I had entirely forgotten that I'd blocked jordanlund

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

Good lord it's always Jordan. Sucks so much.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

It’s been a couple weeks since our good friend Jordan was in here for something stupid.

[–] Matty_r 5 points 2 days ago

No idea what this is all about, but received is spelt incorrectly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well this escalated somewhat...

Anyway, all sorted, now back to your regularly scheduled drama.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

This would have bugged me for a bit if I didn't track some things down. I learned a few things through this, so thanks for pointing all of it out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lemmy world is run by trump administration probably.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not enough money in the WORLD for me to work for Trump.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Says the most famous liberal on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

liberals... trump...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have the same energy as the democrats that laughed at pro-Palestinian protesters at the DNC, and only half their hair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, no, I have way more hair than that, it's just not on my head. ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First time I’ve ever heard of somebody bragging about being a neckbeard.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should have been there the year my kid asked for an honest to god fedora for Christmas... Thank god it was just a phase.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ll make fun of you, but I won’t make fun of your kid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

He's an honest to god AI data scientist now, totally OK to make fun of him. :) I kid, I kid...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Famous to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I do think they're ran by a corporation of some kind, but I'd lean more towards a social media company like Meta or Reddit. They power moved themselves as controlling the front page pretty early on.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

They power moved themselves as controlling the front page pretty early on.

Its about banning from specific sublemmy like news, politics, political_memes, and world such that only a specific world view is allowed to filter through, and frankly, Jordon Lund isn't even close to the worst offender. By far, squid was an order of magnitude more editorial. Jordon's got issues like his completely ridiculous on what counts as a news source (he bases this on the technology stack a site is producing content under rather than if they have an editorial review board or not), but as a volunteer mod doing a thankless job, I've tried to give them some grace when it comes to their actions.

Its wearing thin though.