this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1490 readers
29 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

NSFW, because this is a pattern for him. So, he used to work on Beaker, a Web browser built on top of the Dat/Hypercore DHT. I recall my experience chatting with him and others on IRC. I had been interested because Dat and Beaker were supposedly built with ocap theory, and at the time I was helping to produce a capability-safe object-oriented programming language. Relevant highlights:

  • He did not grok the idea that users might dig below the chrome and directly access APIs. This dovetailed with a lackluster approach to security. In capability theory, users are expressly permitted to do anything they are capable of doing; but Beaker's philosophy was that users ought to restrict themselves to only clicking buttons in Beaker's chrome.
  • In general, interoperability was not a big priority. I'm not sure if there's multiple Hypercore implementations yet, but at the time, there was only one reference implementation and not enough documentation to reimplement it from scratch. So, I wouldn't be able to federate with their DHT using my custom software.
  • I didn't know who the project leaders were. One time, one of the project leaders came onto IRC, and I made the mistake of greeting them. As a result, I was immediately banned from their IRC channel. However, none of them knew how IRC works, and so they did not kick me; in the aftermath, I listened as they went around the room and disavowed me, covering their asses by explaining that they didn't know who I was or why I was in the room.

Those first two points rhyme with his actions here. The third point is where I think we can see things heading in the future.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Bluesky is currently a wonderful microbiome on a deck on the Titanic, watching that spectacular iceberg over there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

at the time I was helping to produce a capability-safe object-oriented programming language

this sounds like absolutely my kind of shit

He did not grok the idea that users might dig below the chrome and directly access APIs.

One time, one of the project leaders came onto IRC, and I made the mistake of greeting them. As a result, I was immediately banned from their IRC channel.

god though, this dev and their projects all sound like a complete garbage fire

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I actually kinda agree with him that these are not the biggest issues around. It is a very common issue (Discord for example has various bugs like this (and iirc even excludes security flaws like this from their bug bounty)) and at least they are working on workarounds.

The bigger issue here is the bad response to the person reporting the bugs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could just as easily say that this is a fundamental design flaw shared by Bluesky and Discord; e.g. Signal and IRC don't have this problem. Security isn't just about response to criticism, but about making design choices which protect users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well IRC doesn't support rich text at all. Even I can admit some text formatting can be a nice feature sometimes. The "disguised link" issue applies to any medium that allows posting formatted hyperlinks like this: https://example.com/

Allowing this kind of formatting for the link cards seems like an odd choice, and seems to stem from reusing the component for other media embeds. Ultimately it's just an extension of the same principle. With sufficient formatting, you can obfuscate or spoof your hyperlinks. You could argue that the link preview card feature itself is superfluous and not having it at all would help mitigate the issue. The latter part is true, but you need to consider that some people seem to actually want link previews. It's a staple feature for IRC bots, too.

It's true that these oversights make it easier to sneak malicious content in your posts and that presents a legitimate security issue. But I think it's also true that posting a disguised malicious link is trivial in any social media platform. It's an issue inherent to the way the web is structured. I would consider these pretty minor as far as security flaws are considered.

My other feelings about Bluesky as a project aside, I'm sympathetic to them on this one. The presented issues straddle the line between a bug and a feature and at least they're promising mitigations. A noncommittal reply four days later is better than what many companies would give. I'm not commending them for handling this especially well, but I don't think it's TechTakes level bad.

Totally safe link

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Paul is one of the most approachable and reasonable of the bsky devs. Take someone like Why, who is a crypto dweeb, a rationalist and a Vibecamp regular.

If you start at rationalists, crypto bros or rationalist crypto bros, you may not be picking from the top of the barrel.

Bluesky has one of the best user bases and it's run by rationalist crypto bros who totally aren't nazis, they're just the other ten guys at the table. I think of them reading Scott Alexander rant for the past ten years about the EVILS of feminists, leftists, social justice warriors and non-race-scientists, and GUESS WHO YOUR USERBASE IS MFs