this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
157 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
3946 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

fuck no we aren't.

anyone who says otherwise can fight me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

And I'm pissed that you got to this comment first!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

IMO, the reason is because scientists haven't found a way to punch someone in their face over the internet yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

I've long thought that phones needed a taze button. Every telephone in the world should have the power to deliver a high power electric shock to the user, and the phone network should only allow the callee to taze the caller. So if you call someone, the person you have called can taze you.

I don't see any problem with the telephone network that can't be solved by putting a 30,000 volt potential across the caller's jaw. Make it work on call bots too, if a computer automatically calls you and you don't want it to, put Shearon Harris on the line. Modern problems require 2nd Amendment solutions, and if you elect me as your president in 2028 it is these policies that I shall energetically enact.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

the platforms see it as lucrative, therefore its hating eachother time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

I’ve been facing a lot more personal harassment over disagreements on the internet that should never lead to that level of harassment. Like taking photos of me from my profile, photoshopping them, sharing them labeled as a pedophile because of my appearance, and Last weekend I had an angry racist threaten to dox me to my employer that I— called out racism?— trying to get me fired.

I feel like the paid trolls have gotten really aggressive since the election.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I have. I honestly try not to be. There's just so many uncaring shits online. It makes me sick to think of how fucked up these trolls are to relish causing others distress. Then I become a dick

I'm trying to be better

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I feel like I'm fighting a one-person crusade every time I respond politely to some jerk online. Last night I couldn't sleep because some rando on the internet said mean things. Why are humans like this? Why can't we just be nice? Sometimes I feel like we deserve to go extinct.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There’s just so many uncaring shits online.

I wonder how much "hate" on the internet is this... but the reality is that is how you "see" them in your head rather than what they're actually saying/believe. A lot of negative responses to some of the things I say is a strawman of what I actually believe/said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Someone hacked a roomba last year to yell the N word at people on a mic.

The WORLD has become more hateful, it is not simply perception.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I went to high school in the south, I'm not white.

The hate is not something you can process, the worst we see online, the Andrew tates, the people calling for all brown people to be deported to El Salvador, that's Disney compared to them.

Becauae it was all they had, and the hate infused them down to the cells, such that it was all they had keeping them going.

Trump took the lid off, let them feel more comfortable talking in public.

But these are people who casually discuss how the only way to heal the world is to exterminate all the Muslims and jews, how we should nuke China now because we can, and how atheists and anybody more left than Trump needs to be castrated now for the good of America.

To people shocked at the toxicity, I think you grew up in far more sheltered places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Dude I grew up dirt poor on govt cheese in the 70s and 8os. Homeless at times, hunted and fished more for food than bought it

Sheltered? Nah.

Saddened.... Dismayed? Yes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Maybe sheltered isn't the right word.

You grew up in a nurturing home.

Everyone didn't have that luxury, and many grew up to be assholes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay? I never said "ALL HATE on the internet is bullshit"... I said "I wonder how much is just people constructing shit in their own head."

This is exactly my point. You chose to interpret my words in a way that I clearly would have never intended if you actually spent time to read the words and understand them for what they were rather than some magical interpretation that clearly was never said.

Edit: Thanks for the downvote too! Proves the point further.

Edit2: And on your specific point I would argue otherwise. In the past, humans would just kill each other rather than yelling words through a machine. Literal murder -> Mean words is a de-escalation. We can do better for sure... do not misconstrue that, but to claim that we're more hateful now, when history shows us murdering each other for less is a bit silly of a stance to take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I think you're actually doing here what you are accusing me of re: misinterpretting. My last comment was mild af.

The world has become more hateful. It's not just online or in people's heads. We have evidence that massive online warfare happens, literal psychological warfare and soldiers paid to post hate online all day every day. One independent journalist estimated at least a trillion dollars spent for various election/political meddling in 2024 and 2025, with protests in Romania, Georgia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Korea, Germany, Poland, etc etc etc.

So yeah, you got a downvote, grow up about it. You're wrong and didn't contribute anything meaningful to the conversation. This isn't even "hate," this is simple disagreement that you are too thin-skinned to handle.

Hate is stuff like: ableism, misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia. Eg a roomba yelling the N word at people. It is not disagreeing with you and downvoting you, lol. For fucks sake.

Edit for your E2: The massive online armies are using online hate to conduct genocides and kill people more efficiently. With massive networks of countries with camps and slavery including Assad's knowledge of death camps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You’re wrong and didn’t contribute anything meaningful to the conversation.

So you think that out of all the hate on the internet... NONE of it is constructed shit in people's own head?(keep in the mind that the article itself talks about personality disorders and DSM-5, literally talking about things like schizophrenia and ADHD... mental disorders that affect how we think are in that book). That this number is so infallibly 0% that my thought doesn't contribute ANY meaningful value to discuss at all? You sure that it contributed nothing to the conversation and that's why you downvoted? Cause it would appear to me that you've just chosen to ignore the words, ascribe your own meaning to stuff that wasn't there and then downvoted because you didn't like it.

It's clear that this is happening on the internet in many cases. In saner parts of the internet (sometimes even here on lemmy) you'll see two people arguing, a misconception clear up, and magically all the "hate" dissolved away and both parties walk away amicably.

Hate is stuff like: ableism, misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hate

It only means that as an adjective, or under pretense where it's clear that we're talking about a class of people, if that's the case it wasn't clear to me and I just took it as a general overall "the world seems more hateful". Which it wasn't used any other way in the comments up to this point this way nor the article itself. So now you've constructed some other thing that nobody has referenced just so you can argue some other point that nobody else was apparently making. Keep in mind that the whole thread started with "Hostile" from the article, and not "hate". The article doesn't reference anything about any specific classes of people, and even talks about personality disorders (so medical perspective) rather than " ableism, misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia" and other... uh... character flaws(? might not be the correct phrase to use but maybe the point comes across) that shitty people have.

Edit: Oh and I don't care about downvotes. But the fact that YOU downvoted the comment was part of the point. It literally is adding context to the actual discussion we're actively having. It's directly related behavioral response that's worthy of discussing in this particular discussion. Trust me I get down-voted plenty on Lemmy and couldn't care less otherwise. Usually for not immediately jumping on a bandwagon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah see, I don't buy that. I can say things in a less than PC way, but it takes tow to argue. If I don't make an effort to be understood, I can't be pissed when I'm not

And since I can't force others do that, I can only do what I can

We are all responsible for what we say , good and bad

But thank you for sharing, sincerely

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 13 hours ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I won't do what you tell me.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago

Fuck you and I'll see you tomorrow!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

I'm not your you, buddy!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Here's the thing.

The last 10 years have proven that organized online hostility is VERY EFFECTIVE at dictating public opinion.

That's how we got the new fascist movements. Trump and the like. Because right wing hostility and bigotry went not only unchecked institutionally but unchallenged socially.

No solution has emerged for that from an institutional level.

So yeah, my socialist ass is fighting back. I'll be damned if I'm going to spend the rest of my life under these fucking wastes of flesh and their bullshit antiquated opinions. I'm done taking it and I'm done tolerating it. Fuck every last republican and homophobe and transphobe and complicit liberal. All of them. And wouldn't you know it, little by little they're backing down when we stand up to them like the cowards they are.

Yes, I am deliberately far more hostile online, because it WORKS. And clearly nobody with institutional control cares enough to try anything else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

There's a war going on.

A war of ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

Seems to be a positive trend happening. Instead of just nothing but toxic trolls. People are starting to push back on the mindless bullshit that is ruining the world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

Yes, and it's a good thing. The Paradox of Tolerance. If we want a world where people are free to choose and believe and live unique and different lives, we cannot stand by and do nothing while intolerant assholes live their lives.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, fuck off, how very dare you suggest such a thing you horrid bastard you, just you wait, I’m going to punch you in the elbow and knock over your second-favourite house plant for insinuating such lies

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Hey. You don't talkt to op like this you fucking degenerate piece of shit, we're all being nice to each other!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've blocked both of you idiots

[–] [email protected] 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve always been a terse asshole.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Your mother is a hamster. >:(

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

At least my father doesn't smell like elderberries

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

But will you join us on our quest for the Holy Grail?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

What a terrible headline. All of us? No. Next.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

“Why are online discussions about politics more hostile than offline discussions?
A popular answer argues that human psychology is tailored for face-to-face interaction and people’s behavior therefore changes for the worse in impersonal online discussions…
Across eight studies, leveraging cross-national surveys and behavioral experiments (total N = 8,434), we test the mismatch hypothesis but only find evidence for limited selection effects.
Instead, hostile political discussions are the result of status-driven individuals who are drawn to politics and are equally hostile both online and offline.
Finally, we offer initial evidence that online discussions feel more hostile, in part, because the behavior of such individuals is more visible online than offline.”

This fits with our understanding of personality disorders, which is that they are a small percentage of our society—around 10.5 percent, according to the recent DSM-5-TR.3

I try to avoid all politics online because it's all raging and it's honestly depressing that 10.5% can dominate a space like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›