this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
194 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

37707 readers
592 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is an open question on how to get the masses to care...

Unfortunately, if other people don't protect their privacy it affects those who do, because we're all connected (e.g. other family members, friends). So it presents a problem of how do you get people who don't care, to care?

I started the Rebel Tech Alliance nonprofit to try to help with this, but we're still really struggling to convert people who have never thought about this.

(BTW you might need to refresh our website a few times to get it to load - no idea why... It does have an SSL cert!)

So I hope we can have a useful discussion here - privacy is a team sport, how do we get more people to play?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I've noticed many people tend to look for alternatives when their mainstream apps are either temporarily down or become greedy.

I remember a few years ago Meta servers were down which resulted in my whole family and some friends at least partially moving over to Signal. Now it's important that the alternative has at least the basic features people want. Most people are not ubernerds like us willing to sacrafice GIFs, emoji's or whatever and would switch back once they realize it's missing features.

For instance, I've noticed people becoming increasingly frustrated with Windows but won't switch to Linux due to missing program or game support.

So ultimately I think the focus should be for privacy-respecting apps to be feature-complete. It's much easier to convince someone to switch if there's a reason to stay.

This probably means sacrificing on security features but I don't think the goal should be for everyone to be on Qubes OS and SimpleX. Rather having at least basic online privacy and the ability to remove data on demand.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I think making it as easy and feature packed as the big commercial apps and services would go a long way.

Right now asking someone to switch to a more private service/app is not only the work of switching over, but also learning an often much more complex system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As a thought experiment: what would have happened if instead of a public health regulation approach, we dealt with restaurant safety by providing a few safe places and advocating everyone go there if they don’t want salmonella or e-coli poisoning. We’d have people ignorant going to the dangerous places, others misinformed or in denial, and a flood of misinformation that food poisoning is either “fine” or there’s no avoiding it anyway so best not to worry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Interesting!

And then Fuckerberg would gaslight us by declaring that "public health is dead"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Yes, all while he’d have a private chef and a staff that keep him safe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

@[email protected]

Another wall of text no one will ever read does nothing. Here's what works:

https://lemmy.world/post/21620691 https://lemmy.world/post/20950542

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anyone want to join my privacy team? I'm trying out for the 2026 Olympics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Same brooo🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

for the site see if you can reissue the cert or try certbot if u already used certbot try manyally downloading the cert an pointibng to it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The site is hosting by a hosting company - and they assure me that the cert is fine.

If I was self hosting I'd expect these problems, but not with a hosting company.

The only difference with this company is that they do not use any big tech infrastructure - they have their own servers. I wonder if big tech has something they don't.....?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

idk for me it doesnt say a error just cannot complete request and https even though connections not secure its quite odd and i can use http for it an it works

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

really? It works with just http? that is weird.

It suggests to me that the web hosting company we are using don't know what they're doing. We're going to change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

theres a lot of hosts you can find on https://kycnot.me/ if you need options still

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (4 children)

you should stop calling people "normies", if you want them to care about what you have to say

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

noted, and you're right.

I actually mis-applied that term in my post. I've been trying to learn about tech, and self hosting in particular, along this journey. I found that 'normies' is the term that tech-savvy people apply to people who don't know about tech - i.e. me! - and I started using it. In the sense of "these install instructions will never work with normies".

In this context I shouldn't have used it to refer to people who do not care about data privacy. I'll edit my post.

Thank you for pointing that out!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Privacy is a team sport - how do we get more more people to play?

now you're calling them "more"s 🙂

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I call them normies not because I look down upon them or I hate them I do that because whenever I educate them to use privacy oriented services they mock me saying "you are crazy" "you aren't president" "nobody cares about your data" yada yada yada...

It makes me frustrated :(

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Starting by not calling people that don't know/care about privacy "normies", and educating them I guess.

Also I'd say start with the "easier" ones, for instance anti-capitalist people are more open to find ways to avoid surveillance capitalism. If enough of these people care and educate their respective circles, eventually all people will care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think certain arguments work, and certain don't.

I live in a very high trust society, Norway. This has a lot of advantages, but also some downsides.

We trust eachother, our neighbours, our government and our media. Which is fantastic, and well deserved. The government deserves the trust.

This makes it hard for me to make people realize how important privacy is, because they trust organizations with their data.

During COVID, Norway made their own app for tracking who met to prevent the spread. Of all the apps in the world, Norway wanted to push about the least privacy friendly app in the world. This from a country with the highest press freedom and rankings for democracy. Most people though it was fine, because why not? We trust our government.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/norway-covid19-contact-tracing-app-privacy-win/

Luckily someone protested enough, and it got scrapped for something better.

When I try to convince someone I have a couple of angles:

  1. You trust the government and organizations with your data today. But do you trust the government in 30 years? Because data is forever. The US has changed a lot in a very short time, this can happen here as well

  2. You have a responsibility for other peoples privacy as well. When you use an app that gets access to all your SMSes and contacts you spy on behalf of companies on people that might need protection. Asylum seekers from other countries for instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

This is a VERY interesting perspective - thank you for sharing!

You are lucky in Norway to have that level of trust, but I'd never considered the flip side: that it would create a dangerous apathy about privacy.

Your two angles are great:

  1. This is so true but for some it is so nebulous, and it countries like the UK (and especially if you are white and not struggling financially) then there is an exceptionalism that creeps into the thinking. Probably because we've never been invaded and occupied. I was in Norway last year, and Denmark this year, and no one wants that to happen again. It seems to have shaped thinking a lot - correct me if i'm wrong 😊

  2. This is a big one - privacy is a collective problem. It's a team sport. I have had some success with this argument.

What's very hard is to convey to people just how amazingly powerful and efficient big tech's profiling models really are. Trillions of computations a minute to keep your creepy digital twin up to date. Most people cannot get their head round the scale of it, and I'm struggling to visualise it for them!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Something similar happened in Denmark with the new Sundhedsloven, which had provisions allowing the government to forcefully isolate people in concentration camps, along with forcefully vaccinating them. This was during the COVID-19 pandemia.

This was of course alarming for those who were in the know, but very few people protested (and the law was subsequently amended), but the general attitude from the public was "it's not a problem because something like THAT would ever happen in Denmark." 🤡

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Convince them to trust open source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have a feeling a whole bunch of people are about to start caring, when they see normal things being used as excuses to arrest friends, family, colleagues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm in the UK and there's a feeling amongst some that "we're next" if we don't curb the rise of the far right.

The Reform party's victories here this week are another alarm bell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I'd say those some are spot on. Governments love the "look what that country is doing!” while doing the same or worse, surreptitiously. Prestidigitation, really.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe start by not calling them "normies".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're right. I replied to someone else about this - I'll change the post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I think it's a good idea. People are more likely to cooperate and take advice from people who don't call them names. Although i understand that "normie" was not meant as an insult. But it might be perceived that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People want convinience. You'll never get people to do it, unless it personally affects them. Realisticly, you can convert a few.

But most importantly. It shouldnt be that hard to have privacy. THATS the problem. People shouldnt need to do alot of things to get it.

Do something about the problem (political, legally change privacy laws) instead of every single person.

But I know that can be near impossible depending of where you live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

oh yes, convenience.... a big problem when moving from the alternatives.

And I have to acknowlege that I'm an unusual case - I would rather use a less-good service than give my data to a better one. I know most people don't think like that.

That's why the alternatives we recommend are usually the zero knowledge encrypted ones, and they need to have a good experience. But privacy by design is sadly not that widely adopted in products. It has been increasing though, but just very slowly.

And about your point to hit the problem when mass change can happen e.g. political, legal - that is more the domain of our friends at other orgs like EFF, noyb, The Citizens etc. But you're right, that is where change needs to happen. Not easy when the big tech firms lobby so hard and throw money at the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, they really do throw money around to keep control..

And I know it doesnt help to always say "we need political change" because it's also an easy escape to just say that.

Im also trying my best moving me and my friends to other platforms, and we shouldnt stop. Be the change.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I have learned that the best game is simply not to play. You risk annoying the hell out of people. Let them get curious, maybe mention it but they have to come to you. Pushing it onto people who do not care is simply not worth it. You are wasting your time, this is real life. Some people will simply not want to care. It is their choice and sometimes that choice will not match yours.

The people I have so-called converted where people who actually were interest to know more. If you push it on people who are not interested then you risk being that annoying person who comes off as an activist or ideologue.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Steal their identity and doxx them. They'll play along after that experience

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

harsh! but might work lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's several overlapping problems:

First, that the problem is complex. It's not just "Microsoft bad." There's a turducken lasagna of layered problems that make it hard for the average person to wrap their heads around the issue.

Next, there's no direct monetary incentive. You can't say "you lose $500 a year because data brokers know your address." Most people also have relied their whole lives on free email, so the average person in already in "debt" in terms of trade offs already.

You're also starting from a point of blaming the victim in a way. It's the same problem companies have with cybersecurity, blaming everyone except the executive that didn't know the risks of skimping on cyber budgets. Hiding the problem to avoid public shame is the natural human response.

Finally, that resolving the problem is fucking hard. I know, we all know, it's a constantly moving target that requires at the very least moderate technical skill. My partner wants to have more privacy online, but would rather have conveniences in many cases. And has zero patience for keeping up with changes, so I have to be a CISO for a household. So the average person, and the average household, does not have the skillset to care "effectively" if they wanted to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

First of all, it's May 4th so happy Star Wars day Han Solo!

Your points land... hard. Yes it is so messed up that privacy has been pushed on the end user as 'their problem to fix with consent choice'. As you all know here it's not a real choice.

Yes this should all be solved at the regulatory / gov level, but whilst the EU has been doing some great things recently, and the US has just kicked Apple and Google and Meta in the balls for antitrust, it's never enough - there's just too much lobbying and money washing around.

So, sadly, it does come down to the individual. My position is "if huge numbers of people starve the system of their behavioural data, then the surveillance economy is less effective, and perhaps other business models will have a chance". Do you think that holds water?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

And may The Force also be with you.

And don't take it personally, it's a fair question with an answer that it's exactly why people get degrees in things like public policy.

The way to "solve" this for the average person is two steps: services like DeleteMe making them feel like they can "get back" their privacy. Second is dumbed down education with easy means. 1 year ago, uBlock did amazing stuff, and only 33% of internet users were using it. Exclude 25% of the remainder as enterprise setups not allowing extensions, and you still have 40+% of people online just rawdogging MSN and Yahoo and Drudge Report. Like, have you seen that internet lately? It's fucking intolerable. But the same peoe that install searchbars won't install uBlock. You have to be aggressive explaining value for 10 seconds of time.

It's a genuine campaign that takes time and alluring promos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It has to be easy, low effort, and something there friends are doing too.

load more comments
view more: next ›