this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
666 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

9591 readers
1547 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

As an unfortunate USian, I get a small panic attack any time the red option is shown as the winner of an election. Good on Y'all for not catching too much of our crazy.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So crazy that the Conservative Party still has 144 seats given that they've basically signed on to a policy of foreign occupation.

Feels like I'm watching liberated France send Philippe PΓ©tain back in as the Loyal Opposition with 40% of the vote.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's not what their base believes. There is a whole other fantasy reality in their channels about how Carney has planned all along to cut a secret deal with Trump after the election. Other justification narratives probably exist as well, because they have to keep people believing that obviously, everyone knows we couldn't possibly do anything other than completely fold into Trump's plans. They spew propagandistic garbage like this and teach people to distrust legit media that understands context and checks facts rather than running with conspiracy theories based on flimsy evidence.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The conservatives still turned out a lot of votes. The left just voted strategically to keep them out. Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again. Given the parties recent history even if it isn't Poilievre I'm sure they will pick another alt right sycophant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

More likely is the Conservatives will split back into 2 parties. The Progressives vs the Reformers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again.

Rather than settling for the investment banker, they could all rally around a candidate that's interested in social good.

The Left doesn't have to split.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 162 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Look at how close it was. Canada may want to start stomping down the Trump wannabes now or they will be where the US is in about 10 years (or sooner).

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I think "stomping down" is the wrong phrase to use. Regardless, I have a couple in my family... Asking them "how do I change your mind" or "what would need to happen for you to even consider the other side" has shown me some people can't be helped.

I wanted to vote NDP but I felt I had to vote Liberal to negate their PP vote. My riding is liberal this time and I'm super happy.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (24 children)

The ones that can't be reasoned with; They have to be stomped down. We tried to be nice to the maggots, but it didn't work.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

An electoral reform wouldn't hurt.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

This is my main thought. Once the immediate threat of Trump is past, the country will return to the global standard of "elect whoever wasn't running things when everything got worse". I hope the liberals see that writing on the wall and put electoral reform in place so that the smaller parties stand a chance and aren't all killed by the usual "strategic voting" nonsense.

I really think it's Canada's best shot at not electing a Conservative majority when the party seems to be at peak crazy. I'd really rather not count on them returning to the center over the next 4 years when global politics is more divided than I've ever seen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not Canadian, Thank you Canada, there is hope after all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

There's hope but this was too close. The Conservatives upped their numbers as did the Liberals. It was only the progressive/reasonable vote banding together that saved the day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its complicated; I cant really see the hope for these reasons. Canada had a housing crisis 10 years ago, prices were way too high relative to incomes. The shortage then worsened and prices ratcheted up as we increased immigration.

In 2023 we had huge asset price inflation like most places, due to QE from the Bank of Canada that was used to fund Covid stimulus, which caused asset values to skyrocket. We took in over a million people that year to sustain asset prices and keep wages depressed. This is known as the phillips curve, its generally expected wages rise after inflation due to wage pressure, as people ask for raises to deal with the rising cost of living.

https://thehub.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Fig1_AnnualPopulationGrowth_graph_v1-1170x839.jpg

Canada's main cities are now within the top 10 most expensive cities in the world. The income required to afford to live there is above 200k, while the median wage is only 70k a year.

https://globalnews.ca/news/10572326/impossibly-unaffordable-housing-vancouver-report/

Carney promised to cap immigration at 1% population growth a year, which is 415,000 people a year. Annual deaths are at around 320,000, and births about 360,000 people, so we will grow at around 465,000 people a year. Given in 2022 we welcomed the most we have ever welcomed at 405,000, where prices were already rising dramatically, I dont see how the cost of living gets any better for young people. I actually dont see a single change to the existing Liberal plan at all, they were basically expecting that exact same number in 2022.

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2022/11/an-immigration-plan-to-grow-the-economy.html

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (20 children)

A very important thing to remember this election: The Conservatives had a 30-point lead and were set to gain over 200 seats in a sweeping majority victory and they blew it. They blew it and their leader lost his own seat. The fact we even have a Liberal minority at all is incredible.

So while the Conservative party still has a lot of seats, enough Canadians disliked PP and his campaign enough to erode a 30 point lead. PP says he is staying on as party leader but his party would be incredibly foolish to keep him. His campaign cost them a historical election victory and the dude can't even get elected in his own riding.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Canada had Australian-style preferential voting (i.e. you numbered your candidates in order of preference, and if your first choice got eliminated, your vote cascaded to your second, and so on until it was tallied for your least-disliked of the two leading candidates), the Liberals would have a significantly more comfortable margin (assuming that they got most of the Greens’ preferences and at least half of the NDP)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (7 children)

We were supposed to get election reform after the liberals won in 2015 and I'm still quite bitter about it

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I believe the whole world would be in much better shape if everyone handled elections like Australia. We certainly wouldn't have had Trump ever here. When more people vote the Democrats win every time.

I strongly support mandatory voting. If you're against voting at all for whatever reason, just turn in a blank form. And I'm no big fan of the Democrats, but they wouldn't be kidnapping people to send them to concentration camps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

If we had ranked choice or some other system, dems and repubs would both lose to third parties that actually represent the people

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully this will signal to the Conservatives that Canadians don't have any use for a demagogue who attributes the world's ills to "wokeness," but I'm not holding my breath.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Conservatives have more seats now so that’s definitely not the lesson they’re learning. Probably this just means that they need to pick a rural district to run their party leader

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I am a fan. I have joy.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Thoroughly hilarious. Go away Chode boy, nobody likes you!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So, now what for Poilievre?

Maybe the knives come out and he's forced out as Conservative leader. I mean, he had a 20 percentage point lead over the Liberals and lost it. That has to piss them off. All he needed to do is do what Doug Ford did and stand up for Canada and against Trump.

But, if he doesn't step down, where does he get someone to step down so he can run in a by-election? If he wants to stay near Ottawa, he'll really have to move somewhere rural. He doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who actually likes rural people or rural life very much. Or, he could move to Alberta. Lots of safe Conservative ridings in Alberta, some are even in urban areas. But, will they want a guy who is the very model of a carpet-bagger? A politician who has never had a job outside of politics, not just from "Ottawa" meaning the federal government, but who has literally lived in Ottawa(ish) for years?

I hope they ditch him. I'm sure the conservative party could do a lot worse, but there's also a chance they could find a leader who has actually done something with their lives outside politics, and who has their own ideas, not just reheated culture war crap from Canada's Shorts and just shouting down anything the Liberals suggest.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (8 children)

He lost his seat. He's toast. He'll be writing op-eds for Postmedia in a month.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

FUCK OFF BACK HOME PIERRE HAHAHAHAHAHA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know nothing about canadian politics, but Fanjoy looks like he is having a lot of fun and joy. 😺

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To give a bit of context. The person in second, Pierre Poilievre, is the leader of the Conservative party and campaigned for Prime Minister of Canada. Canadians don't vote directly for Prime Minister. The country is divided into a few hundred ridings and each riding gets to elect a Member of Parliament. The party with the most MPs gets to form government, and their leader becomes the Prime Minister.

Not only has Poilievre failed to win enough seats for the Conservative party to form government, he might not even win his own seat. A seat he has held for 20 years. It would be embarrassing for him and hilarious for all the Canadians that think he's a dickhead.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Thanks for clarification!

not even win his own seat

As in he won't be elected as a member of parliament because not enough people voted for him in his region?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (14 children)

He wasn't elected.

Results are in.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (19 children)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί