this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
531 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
3718 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I mean... fine? France always does things kind of top-down and there's certainly no reason you have to have your phone readily available, and plenty of evidence it's good to be away from it.

It's not like they need to get to their phones to tell their parents there's an active shooter on campus. 😐

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago

We've had a similar ban in the Netherlands for a year or two now. Mobile phones were already not allowed in classes. Kids seem to have survived.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (25 children)

Good, you don't need smart phones in school

For anyone screeching that you do: No. You don't.

We've been without smart phones for millenia, literally, and we were fine without. You will be fine without.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

we didnt have clean drinking water either, or daily showers, we lived without soap for millenia

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LaggyKar 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We've been without a lot of things for millennia

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

Uh huh, and we can do without the bad things

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

For me school was a great way to learn almost nothing of any use while occupying 11 years of my life with pointless time filing busywork that I hated every hour, minute and each and every eternal second of of. The only thing worse than school has been work and my consolation is that at least it's not forever!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Brazil did it a while ago. Nobody died [yet]

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (15 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy? This happens everytime a new technology becomes popular and schools don't know how to regulate it they do this.

The downside is, a fair few student will have their phones confiscated by the school. But it won't dissuade them from bringing them in. You make them better at hiding them instead of creating tools and protocols to enforce for when they can and can't use them.

The crazy thing is, this should be about schools not wanting to be liable for or responsible for these pieces of tech. But Everytime I see legislation like this, it's to do with "children's mental health", or these devices being a distraction.

Model it. Nobody should be allowed to have a phone in schools by this metric. No phones for students? No phones for teachers and administration.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah I think the adverse effect of handing an iPhone to a 10 year old in Atlanta, when that teen is still highly impressionable unrestricted and unsupervised access to the internet is far worse than handing a kid a Gameboy on which they can only game, or a Walkman on which the worst thing they can do is listen to Cardi B.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy?

Except none of these things were feeding Andrew Tate or Joe Rogan garbage straight into their highly impressionable skulls.

I, for one, support the banning of phones in schools. The social media addiction has been shown to cause depression, particularly in girls, and the brainwashing is ever more apparent.

If anything, this policy fails by not going far enough. I question whether kids should have access to social media at all before a certain age.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rush Limbaugh was broadcast on the free radio, you could listen to it on $1 worth of junk parts if you knew what you were doing. The ease of access is not what made republican bigotry accessible or popular.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but we're talking about a way different scale. "If you knew what you were doing" being a key word here.

It's never been easier to come across this garbage when youtube/Instagram/Tiktok comes installed on most phones by default. What's worse, there have never been so many grifters spewing the same shit.

Back in the day, you might have been able to call Limbaugh an isolated instance of a clear grifter getting paid to spread lies.

Nowadays, the Tate clones are so ubiquitous that it's hard to point out the flaws in thinking because so many people seem to believe in them. But its just the algorithm feeding you more of the same, over and over.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It was almost the entirety of AM radio for the past 40 years. Sports and this right-wing trash. On in the background at every work place, hardware store, and cafe until Muzac took over. Had that ranting asshole and his friends pumping into our ears wanting it or not. Many areas of the country had only that and Country Music for hours in any direction.

When I said "if you knew what you were doing" I meant you can build an AM receiver out of literal trash with a middle school understanding of electrics but no one bothered because you had one built in to every car, every tape player, boom box, alarm clock, and anything else with a speaker. You had a radio in every room of the house and 2 in the garage even if you never turned it on. There's no way to believe that phones have less cultural push than AM radio had pre-1990.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I remember when people didn't have phones on them 24/7 and kids didn't die and parents could call the school if they needed to talk to the kids. Somehow we survived.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And a bunch of people didn't but we don't talk about them, it was the norm back then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's funny is all the rich tech elite send their kids to schools that don't use tech to the same degree as public schools. Wonder why.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Because personal tutors are engaging directly with the student the whole session?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Probably because elite schools have smaller class sizes or teacher/student ratios thereby making it less necessary to have the ability to disseminate information via mass means with technology. Put it all up on a big screen where 30 kids can see it, send the assignments out to 120 kids via google classroom on school issued chromebooks (because there are plenty of kids from families that cannot afford computers), and do all the grading and review digitally. I’d be willing to bet those expensive private schools use plenty of tech, maybe kids carry Macbook Airs instead, but there’s no escape from tech in schools.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can't believe it wasn't like that since the beginning.
How is it not one of the many distracting things they would ban immediately?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Good on you France!

I hope more countries start realizing how important this is. We have more than enough evidence demonstrating the damage that comes from being permanently connected, or even online for more than a couple hours per day, and minors are taking the worst of it because they are developing under those conditions.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Make school fun and not a prison and then kids don't need phones like their office worker parents do.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Doesn’t matter if the teacher is an absolute gem and knows how to captivate kids who want to learn. Most kids prefer the dopamine hit from social media and other phone usage compared to actually learning. It just ruins it for kids who actually want to learn.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I'm still not convinced that this is the answer to helping kids concentrate & learn more in school.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

there is no "the" answer but it can be part of an answer.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it is fine but we also need lessons to properly interact with the technology. Scams, fraud, disinformation and checking sources were handled very abstractly at best and archaic at worst.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Gen alpha is significantly worse than prior generations on tech. Them having their phones on them doesn't teach them, they consume on the lowest level. They don't learn the actual Internet skills prior generations had to to survive.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί