this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1198 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
4530 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (41 children)

Unpopular opinion: we don't need freaking internet from satellites, just get cat6 in every home and everyone is happy. I'm sure the cost would be lower then having to launch 999999.91 satellites to have similar speeds

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cat 6A caps out at like 330 ft. Also thats a ton of copper.

Fiber optic nonprofit utilities makes more sense in cities and in rural areas we should just subsidize cell phone data plans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Increased by 3.9X.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What will they launch on? Star Link is barely feasible because they can launch at cost on falcon 9.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Look up Ariane 6. It's still more costly than the Falcon 9 but who in their right mind would trust the numbers Elon is sharing? Seems like they both cost around 100million $ per launch. Elon is claming 30million per launch and that he will make it cost 2 million...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A European Starlink rival’s shares skyrocketed 390% in a week — here’s why

OOOH!!!! OOH!!! I KNOW THIS ONE!!! STARLINK GO BOOM! PEOPLE GO NOPE! TESLAS STOCK PRICE GO (bomb falling sound effects) KABOOM!!!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Good. Fuck Starlink.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm stuck with star link as of present. I would defiantly like for a competent and competent competitor in the market. Competition is the core of capitalism and the driving force behind development.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (8 children)

But also, we cannot have so many god-damn satellites polluting the night sky. Starlink should never have been allowed to get up there as a private actor in the first place.

It's a tricky situation, as international cooperation would be extremely difficult to maintain, especially during situations like the Ukraine war. But having private companies compete to fill the orbit with space waste as soon as possible is hardly a good solution either.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›