!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
The answer is yes.
It was a pattern when you asked ~4 months ago, and when you asked five weeks ago, and when you asked two weeks ago, and when you asked about Zendaya specifically 3 days ago. At this point the more curious pattern is you asking about this over and over.
Wow. You either have a very good memory, or you have a lot of time.
In their defense, there are no stupid questions in this community.
...Although yeah that is hella repetitive. If I'm looking at their history right they haven't talked about a single other thing for the last 3 months. Not even comments or a random
You uh, you doing a study or something Hickak? There an answer you're looking for specifically?
Is it a pattern for right-wing people to attack ~~films, series and animations with protagonists from~~ minority groups? Or is this an exaggeration?
Fixed it for you
The answer is "yes, no exaggeration!" To both
If they aren't white, straight man, then it's a DEI hire
If it's the person is a white, straight man, then it's that they have to work with people that aren't
We're going back to Shakespearean times when only men could be on stage
then it's a DEI hire
”DEI hire” (and ”woke” for that matter) is used as some form of a right wing code word. They point at thing they don’t like and explain it’s because of [insert code word here]. Repeat it enough many times, and you get the impression there’s a pattern.
”Politically correct” served the same purpose before (until it somehow went out of fashion).
'Diversity hire' was a slur agsinst minorities and women for decades before DEI became a term. Turning DEI into a slur ss just the expanded version of the same thing since it also includes equity and inclusion.
Conservatives sure like twisting positive things into scary stories to rile up their base.
gotta keep it fresh and new but somehow still beat the same old divide to conquer drum.
It's a pattern.
I know it seems strange from the anti-cancel-culture contingent of society, but it's a real thing.
anti-cancel-culture
They've always been fine with cancel culture as long as they're the ones doing the canceling.
Their entire political philosophy can be boiled down to an Uno Reverse card.
They don't care about being seen as hypocrites because hypocrisy is merely a display of power. "I get to do this, you don't."
Something something in-groups law protects but doesn't bind something something out-groups law binds but does not protect.
A Disney film or series was going to have a trans character. That's no longer a thing. Guess why.
The series in question is Pixar's Win Or Lose
Now it is just Lose.
I was just remembering the response to the little mermaid, seems like it's a big target
Yes. Any movie or series with a minority member as the protagonist is attacked for being "woke" even if their minority status isn't a plot point. There is no winning, if their minority status is the focus of the movie, people complain that there isn't anything else to the character, if their minority status isn't the focus, people ask why they have to be a minority if it adds nothing to the story.
People complain about remakes changing a character's race and say they should make new and original characters for that race, but when they are featured in new and original stories, people still complain.
The only "grain of truth" I would say to the "woke movies" claims etc... Is that sometimes, studios will use minority casting, as a substitute for coming up with a good story or doing anything actually original in the plot. IE a shit movie with a diverse cast is still a shit movie.
I would suppose it also ties down to the fact that, actually trying to represent more people as a push, also started around the time that, movie costs scaled up so much that investors aren't willing to go in on a movie that isn't a sequel or remake of something that everyone has already seen. Movies now are more diverse, and 90% of them are crap, but the correlation isn't causation, and that's demonstrable by the fact that movies that have all straight white characters, are as bland and unoriginal as the ones that the right blames DEI for why they suck.
But yes... in short DEI, affirmative action, and whatever they called it before has always been the scapegoat for why everything gets worse.
Yes to both. Yes, RWNJs do carry on about it all the time. But there is also a lot of fake outrage about things that either did not happen or were only brought up by a few people.
Pretty much every social media and news post where somebody "slams" something or someone has a high chance of either being completely made up or came from a 4chan thread.
I'd say it's strongly correlated for those who attack minority representation to be right-wing, but the converse correlation is not as strong.