this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
577 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

8240 readers
2746 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago

American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

100% TODAY! Do not pay a fucking dime of any amount owing for these. (good job on Globe and Mail for a change)

FYI, the Israeli version of F35 does not have this "US permission for every flight required"

F35 is a POS plane, with low uptime, in addition to "broken ownership". Even US military does not get manuals on how to repair/maintain them and must hire Lockheed consultants to do the job. The whole program was a boondoggle to pay Lockheed the most money possible instead of getting good military equipment, and any corrupt POS that was involved in approving this purchase for Canada should be jailed for treason.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software. Most of the FUD about it's performance abilities is propaganda. So getting them and just locking out Lockheed and the US would be a pretty good middle finger too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The performance metrics are criticisize by US military journals.

There’s nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software.

If US military can't get them or patch the software, Canada can't either. Israel is special for not putting up with US BS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I haven't seen that. I've only seen blogs saying stuff. And if you have the literal hardware in your hands then changing the software isn't going to be hard as a country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago

Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we're never getting them, though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This would be amazing for us to bring back military building here in Canada!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago

The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they'll get two in a row?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35's is fishy - not that that's happening, of course.

Canada's interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That'll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Nah, y'all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So take the planes, send Trump the bill, when he acts confused you tell him he should really be more grateful about this

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

"have you said thank you even once"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, without American replacement parts I don't know how flyable they are. Stiffing the US on something is an option for next play, though.

Edit: So, correction. Interestingly it looks like the US is actually dependent on others for parts itself, and Japan has a good helping of all the parts in the whole plane being built domestically, so maybe not all is lost there. (This link looks legit, but disclaimer that I'm unfamiliar with it and you can't always tell at a glance post-AI)

That being said, the software is definitely closed-source, and all their design.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

A Trump never pays his debts

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Maybe he should get Mexico to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

[–] Tramort 20 points 1 day ago

Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί