this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
81 points (98.8% liked)

Legal News

369 readers
26 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

"This ruling undermines decades of progress in environmental protection and leaves communities vulnerable to unchecked pollution," said one critic.

Case file: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/scotus-epa-v-san-francisco-wastewater-permit-requirements-opinion.pdf

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

"if the EPA does its work, our holding should have no adverse effect on water quality."

Motherfucker you're undoing their work.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People shouldn't put up with pollution. If the courts won't block pollution, there are other ways.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

If the state won't do it, the people have to, with nastier methods.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cue Trumpers drinking shit water on TikTok to own the libs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

timmy_praying.png