Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.
This is better than nothing. Encourage this, normalise this, it IS recycling.
Doesn't mean we shouldn't be encouraging 'first use' plastic materials to be more recyclable.
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
52 points (93.3% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5684 readers
402 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Down cycling is good. But the best is to just not produce plastics where wood, metal, and glass alternatives exist or actually pre-date their plastic counterparts.
Why do produce containers have to be made of plastic when they can be made from compostable cardboard or wood scrap?
Meat used to come wrapped in paper instead of plastic foam. It still could be. Milk used to come in glass or metal.
Most toy or parcel packaging could come in tissue paper or cardboard.
The only thing that might actually need plastics are medical devices like catheters or other things that cannot be fully sterilized by an autoclave (or might become irradiated).
Recycling isn't perfect and recycling alone can't be the only solution.
But that's still less plastics than making these with new plastics.
Recycling is the last of the 3 Rs: reduce, reuse, recycle.
The criticism of the problems in our recycling system is valid, but almost every time people spin these criticisms into dismissing the system entirely. We need to be more accountable for our material use and waste, not less. It's true the rates materials are used even when they hit a recycle bin aren't great, but arguably it's driven by our desire for something as easy as the landfill that gives us a false warm and fuzzy feeling. Accountability isn't always easy or fun and these flawed systems are driven by our flawed expectations.
Plastics like this are getting burned at electricity-generating plants now instead of going straight to the landfill.
Also, most Nike stores will recycle the foam shoe sole into something else if you bring it in (like running track or playground surfacing).
Reiterating what everyone already said, but what is the thinking process in the article?
Obviously it's better to re-use plastic at least once, even if it can't be recycled afterwards.
And at that point I wanna shamelessly plug an add for the footwear brand 'Wasted'
They are holding up since 2 years now, although they are the only shoes I pretty much ever wear. And (after a few minutes of airing out) they still smell like new, while all other typical high priced brands start to stink after a few months, if worn daily, and especially their glue starts to fall apart, so I can't really fix them, because even if I put in new glue, it will be different and they will gonna be awkward to walk in.
The Wasted ones I got hold up perfectly and are produced seemingly nicely and fair.
Can't recommend them enough :-)