this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
446 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

2097 readers
887 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

2025 OPINION POLLING GREENLAND

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, no shit? Life in America is terrible, why would anyone willingly join?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No. "Developing" implies there's some hope for us improving.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Developing doesn't mean it's being developed for its citizens

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

There's developing, then there's de-veloping

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Important note: 497 participated in the poll. Still seems statistically like a good sample and am happy about the result!

Source: https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-majority-of-greenlanders-reject-trump

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

497 participated in the poll.

wow, thats almost half of the population!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I understand this is a joke and all, but this is about 1% of the population. I don't know how easily Greenlanders have access to the internet and such and how this was distributed, but I actually think 1% is not a bad turnout here

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most Greenlanders have access to the internet. Although the percentage isn't as high as most places in Europe or north America (I assume because of geography).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine how peaceful life would be if you lived somewhere so remote that the Internet couldn't touch you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

well i said ALMOST, didn't I?!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At least ist almost one percent of the total population (~57000), from which those not eligible to vote (children, foreigners) need to be substracted.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the polling organizer did its job correctly and removed bias from their sampling, a beautiful law in statistics has been proven, stating that small-ish samples are representative of the whole population if it follows e.g. a normal distribution. It's called "law of large numbers".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is 500 really big enough to get a proper spread though? Iirc my statistics course (which i don't all that well tbf) you need a pretty significant sample still, would think a few thousand at least

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

497 more than 1% of Greenland's voting population. For larger populations the rule of thumb is generally 1000 people for a good poll, 500 for a decent one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

2000 is the standard max. 500 is probably good enough for most things.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's 1% of their population. For comparison, if you polled Spain's 1% of population, it would have been around 470.000 people (I'm using the 47.000.000 population from memory though)

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, 60% in favour of EU accession and those are numbers from just before the current escalation and with the fisheries policy still being a giant unsolved issue. Might actually fall under the bus because tough luck getting the parliament to reform it if there's no need and with all those minerals Greenland isn't as keen on fishing, any more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this poll is a little early, atleast let the US take Greenland to McDonald's before they can consent to being fucked.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

With our new president? No consent sought...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It is not for you decide Donald Trump, it is the choice of the Greenlandic people. No means no.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I don't think Trump or his buddies know that, no means no, nor would care even if they did.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Your country, my choice."

  • Trump, probably
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Trump makes it a point to brag about not knowing what "no" means

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That 6% should talk to Puerto Rico.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why? Does Puerto Rico have oil or mineral wealth? πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ–€

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No! Because Greenland would be a similar state like Puerto Rico. Something like a colony of the US without any representation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

No taxation without representation or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I can't believe there's so many crazy people in Greenland

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm now curious what those 6% were thinking. The no is basically the default. What males those few say they want to join the US?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

As a German, I'd be more than happy to have only 6% of people voting against the interest of the country..

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A general rule with polls is that you'll never get a result below 5% on a question with 2 options. Those people mostly weren't paying attention, didn't understand the question, didn't care or intentionally chose a contrarian response.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I just want the results of the secondary poll that asks the why. It'd be interesting just to see the real answers.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Everywhere has some Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so 2 voted in favour, 3 withheld, and the remaining 28 citizens voted against?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The poll included 497 participants which is enough to represent the population of 57 000 with a statistical uncertainty between 2 and 4 percent.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I was joking but thanks for the info :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

6 and 85 have no common factors, so this implies that they must have asked some seals as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Oh they’re just playing hard to get

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Wow, I didn't think he'd be able to crack the single digits!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When did 'no' or the law ever stop this guy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The 6% were those maga idiots who visited.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

!dataisugly

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Is there a poll Americans can take? I'd be interested in that too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

6% got paid* by vance

*payment has only been promised, not yet given lolol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Fake news. The human Cheeto said otherwise and I only believe what he says.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Lol, billionaires were only able to buy a 6% stake in this lie that ANYONE in that country wants to be owned by the US, pretty pathetic for an open and I'm sure easily manipulated poll.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί