this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

Opensource

2575 readers
31 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
pylapp
88
German router maker is latest company to inadvertently clarify the LGPL license (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/opensource
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Fuck AVM. They have a monopoly on routers with their ugly proprietary system. You cannot even buy modems for normal prices here

[–] refalo 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So LGPLv2 doesn't actually allow tivoization in Germany now? Am I reading that right?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, I don't think that's quite the same. The developer simply wasn't able to compile the source code, which is a pretty clear requirement in the LGPL 2.1:

For an executable, the required form of the "work that uses the Library" must include any data and utility programs needed for reproducing the executable from it.

[–] refalo 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The posted link does not appear to contain the same statement as what I read from the SFC:

Steck's work showed that despite being a "Lesser" license than GPL, LGPLv2.1 still guarantees users the right to repair, modify and reinstall modified versions of the software on their device.

This is why I believed that the lack of an anti-tivoization clause was being somehow retroactively applied to v2.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Last I read, they're only allowing Tyrolization.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

This isn't an issue for GPL and AGPL, right?