The only thing I disagree with in this post is using the average cost of an Ivy League education. If they're comparing averages, either use all higher education or state universities.
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
1295 points (98.6% liked)
Microblog Memes
6104 readers
1995 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is surely not the reason here, but at least cars have gotten a lot more complex, and the possibilities of health care have also increased a lot. So not all of this increase goes into rich people's pockets. But likely still quite some.
Cars are more complex so that they can spy on you, steal your data, and make even more money as data brokers.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
But this guy will make it great again, surely.
55k sounds really low for a family income. Is that per person?
Federal minimum wage is $15,080 assuming you work 40 hours a week and never get sick or take time off.
$55,000 is two people working $13.22 or a single person working $26.44
load more comments
(2 replies)
Libertarian trash. It literally quotes their god Hayek at the end.
Pointing out that something bad happened in 1971 with matching data sets is not inherently libertarian, the information is in itself not libertarian slanted. Even if the presenters interpretation is wrong, it doesn’t mean the data is invalid.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Only some of it is libertarian trash. The majority of those graphs could be equally interpreted as the need to move towards a more socialist policy.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)