this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
43 points (76.5% liked)

Asklemmy

45225 readers
893 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It probably seems weird asking this on Lemmy, but of course posting this on Reddit would get banned or taken down. Reddit doesn’t like being critical of Reddit. Anyways….

Over the last 10 years as a Reddit user I’ve believe the amount of accounts that are bots or foreign bad actors has tipped past 50%. I have no statistics to speak of, but would love if somebody did and could share.

Based purely on some of the conversations, posts, rage bait, strong ideologies, etc… I’m pretty convinced that a reasonable sample of humans could not or would not act the way they do on that platform. So often now I see posts that I feel are specifically attempting to sow discord and disagreement.

Does anyone else agree? What percent of users do you think are bots? Foreign bad actors?

Sadly, I think Reddit has no desire to find out or do anything about it. There would be no upside to them correcting their advertising numbers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stembolts 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Just an opinion from someone who has been around the internet for a long while. It wouldn't surprise me if most of the comments are bots. I remember what it was like to interact with humans, even dumb humans, and they aren't nearly as blatantly agenda-driven as commenters on what I'd call "visible social media".

There are plenty of people who have a vested interest in disrupting means of communication and organization and they are investing a great deal in "false idea proliferation".

My 0.02¢.

Oh, you asked for a percentage, in the popular subs? 80+%. In niche subs that don't affect the Overton Window? 5-30%. And yes, these numbers are favricated outward from my butt hole.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Probably on the nose.

Source: former forum user that moved to Facebook during the consolidation that moved to reddit during the monitization that moved to the fediverse during the enshitification.

I have no nostalgia about leaving sites that turn to shit or become rage bait click holes. It's just stupid time wasting media.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

You take your fractional pennies and get out of here with those rough guesses I can't refute or deny!

I'd honestly be surprised if a majority of any social space was bots... However I do believe a majority of initial posts are bot generated. Especially for news based spaces. It just makes sense to plug in a bot to whatever biased news source you subscribe to and just have it post new articles every 5 minutes.

Much like the average American voter, I believe in that 50% silent users who are often forgotten. 25% active users, and that other 25% can be whatever ghosts in the system the OP is after.

My numbers are also butthole deriven.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

…interact with humans, even dumb humans…

Hi, it’s me, the dumb human.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Nice try bot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With you on this. As an old school netizen who watched digg enshitification that led me to reddit, then over the years was astonished about how extreme the rightward shift went... I mean the trump choo choo memes on the front page bought and paid for by Steve Bannon and other net savvy investors. It really went to absolute shit. When they banned the API it was a blessing in disguise cause no excuse to go back, especially with the lemmyverse.

TLDR fuck Reddit that platform is dead

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i've likewise been moving from one social media platform onto another since things like bbs & icq were dominant; i used to believe that everything w money behind it eventually enshitified until i started seeing enshitification signs on the larger diet reddit instances like .world and lemm.ee

the diet reddit instances don't have anywhere near the same financial backing that reddit or bluesky has; yet they do the same consent manufacturing and narrative shaping that reddit, bluesky and legacy media does.

and i wonder how its going to look in the future as the enshitification drives liberals to eventually abandon their diet reddit instances once they realize that reddit or bluesky can do "general interest" better than any lemmy instance ever can.

lemmy was built for political outcasts and i suspect that the original leftists instances will always stick around and continue to form new relationships with other leftists and other instances from non-mainstream political factions; but i'm going to assume that the sheer massive size of the general-interest/diet-reddit instances (relatively speaking) will have an impact nonetheless

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was on lemmy.world for a week. My goodness the astonishing degree of bad takes and western propaganda. Yeah, I mean. I hate the data silos but at least on lemmygrad and hexbear there's a modicum of actual good faith dialogue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yep, I essentially use Lemmy.ml to correct misconceptions about Marxism, AES, etc and use my Hexbear account for actual discussion and furthering my understanding of Marxism via interacting to LG and HB.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"Foreign bad actors" Sigh. This is propaganda framing.

The fact that reddit is astroturfed by the US government, US actors like Hillary's campaign in 2016, etc is very well known. Reddit even did an oopsie many years ago admitting that the most active reddit city was a US air force base with influence operations located there, aka psyops, aka propaganda bots.

If it has foreign "bad actors" they don't control the narrative, they don't control the main big subs, they don't have an in with the admin team, they don't run even a large minority of bots.

If these mythical creatures people like you believe in (as a result of the US policy of always accuse your enemies of what you're doing to hide it better) to pretend that the problems are all those evil foreigners do exist they exist as grains of sand caught in a mighty torrential river of US propaganda machines and influence operations. They exist hopeless. Helpless. With no friends on the admin team unlike the US propagandists, fighting a pointless fight where they are almost certainly subject to frequent, near immediate bans after mass downvotes by controlled moderators and/or mods who just are that happy to prevent any viewpoint but the US one from existing.

Even framing your question like this is a massive pushing of US propaganda. This isn't so much a question as a weaponized trojan horse that starts from the point of view of the people who control the most bots and the narrative totally on reddit.

The only thing approaching foreign, non-US "bad actor" astroturfing and botting would have to be the zionist bot effort which is admin and main subs moderation team backed and also backed by the US government by the way who doesn't care to get upset about it or raise it as an issue and demand it stop because they're supplying weapons to that genocide.

I mean the way you state it is literally the line being pushed by US government censorship proponents who are angry any foreign voices, any voices but their own are getting through.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just because the US does it doesn't mean other countries aren't also doing it. OP said bots or foreign bad actors. Sure, a narrow scope that utilizes propaganda language, but your comment is some false dichotomy whataboutism tankie shit

For sources on foreign influence in U.S. social media, consider:

  • A study detailing Russian influence operations on Twitter and their effects during the 2016 election.
  • Research highlighting ongoing influence campaigns by various countries, including Russia and China.
  • Reports analyzing foreign influence tactics.
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Well, he could have just said bad actors, but then the answer would be a lot higher...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your point is fair and I didn’t mean to imply that bad actors are purely foreign. There are plenty of domestic bad actors. Please excuse the “propaganda framing”.

This was my subjective opinion based on the kinds of discussions and posts I see.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would bet the actual number of active bot accounts is probably lower than many people think. Maybe 20-30%. Those accounts are more active than humans though, maybe accounting for half of all the posts. Many of these bots arnt even proper LLMs, they are just scripts recycling generic comments, catch phrases and old memes and upvoting each other endlessly.

[–] stembolts 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I suppose the spirit of the question was "volume of content" vs "volume of accounts". But there is a problem with loading a lot of content onto a singular account (from a bot detection PoV), and that is that it is easy to detect if an account is a bot if their post history is :

  1. Metronomic (or)
  2. Relentless in volume

To solve that problem (aka bot camouflage), the maintainers of said bots would use volume of accounts as a disguise mechanism. For that reason I assume that the volume of bot accounts has to scale with the volume of "pushed content" as, in my assessment.. if I were running a bot network I'd want to be sure that my most-active bots were only 50-80% as prolific as known-human accounts.. then simply distribute your content across those "strategically-limited-spam-bots".

So as a TLDR I guess what I'm saying is that the volume of accounts has to scale with the volume of influence assuming you'd want your influence to appear organic.

The meta above this would be what, account creation monitoring? It's an interesting conflict. Influence peddlers vs bot detectors.

What is gross to me is that platforms like Reddit appear to be catering to the influence peddlers. (or in the case of Facebook and Cambridge Analytica.. allying with and giving birth to said influence peddlers to the political gain of Zuckerberg's personal views on politics.)

Should one person have such power? Probably not. Explains a lot of "unexplainable" occurrences happening.. back to back to back to back to..

This is the modern incarnation of "billionaires buying newspapers" to maintain control of the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is I dont think many of the accounts really care if their total account activity appears organic. They are mostly there to create volume, sometimes to puff up activity metrics, to amplify specific points and narratives, or simply to shut down conversation if it strays into the wrong topic. They know Reddit doesnt actually want to stop them, and the individual accounts rarely say anything interesting enough to justify human users taking the time to evaluate their post history.

[–] stembolts 2 points 1 month ago

You make a good point.. In general, no one cares enough to track all this down. That is true. So that makes me wonder.. who does/would care? So in a capitalist system, until the day the flow of money is impacted, generally nothing changes.

So if Reddit really is all (or vastly) bots, then aren't advertisers paying to advertise to bots? And if that is true, at a certain point some metrics will show the yield on their investments is bunk.

Maybe that is how it collapses. I can hope.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm a foreign good actor (to non-Australians), does that count?

Not to brag or anything, but I was nominated for a couple of acting awards in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are you Bluey? That's exciting!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bluey is also from Queensland, so...close enough.

[–] fool 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone's speculating so I'll put in something concrete:

About 3 months ago, r/wholesomememes mods clamped down on karma-farm bots as hard as they could...

causing no new posts to appear for two entire days.

Hey there friends! It’s only been a few days since we started cracking down on the spam bots and excessive reposts that have been plaguing r/WholesomeMemes - and now there is nothing left! --mod

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That was reposts as well. Its not like anyone was wasting their life making fresh Facebook grade memes for that that cesspit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It’s probably higher than that. Every time I comment on there it feels like a play with the way people act and respond. Like it’s not real, or they have a script to follow. No real person would act the way most Redditors operate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also important to remember that karma farming is a thing over there, alongside the circle jerk. There's thread after thread of people just saying the same shit over and over because it's guaranteed karma.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was on there recently and saw the same LET THEM FIGHT GIF posted 12 times in the same thread and all of them had some number of upvotes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I can't even understand what human would upvote the trash like that

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure this can be bots but at least when I was still active this behavior was also just karma whoring by real people. Comment fast before the thread „expires“ and become one of the top rated comments.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I see a lot of this, where it's become a mix of

  • bots
  • real people that comment like bots

It comes up on the Reddit moderation side where I look into an account assuming it's a spam bot but it's not. There is a certain voice or style that's similar between the two groups of accounts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It makes sense that a vote based platform, where users encounter direct positive and negative reinforcement with every interaction, would tend to developing repetitive conversation patterns over time, even if it were populated entirely with humans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Alternatively, people like to meme on the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

All redditors are bad actors and 99% dont live in my country, so...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

There would be tons of downside if they revealed the bot count. Their website would probably crash and burn. I think it's well past 50% now. Well past.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Im not even sure how normal people post on reddit. Everytime ive ever tried to post on there in a community that isn't tiny my post is automatically removed and sent to "manual approval" which never actually happens. it baffles me how a website that is so hard to post on remains popular.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

There's a few other categories to consider.

Of small niche subs I've moderated, there's maybe a 10 to 1 or higher ratio of non-active users to active. Look at the highest voted posts of all time or the last year in a sub. If the sub as 10K subscribers, the highest number of votes on any post might be 1K or so. Maybe far less.

I saw on a couple of the sub's metrics that we would consistently gain 10-20 users a day, and maybe lose 1-3 subscribers daily. But with very little increased engagement. But so we would gain sometimes 500 or even 1000 users in a month, and nothing changes. Why? Always drove me crazy.

A lot of real people start up accounts and quickly abandon them. A lot of bots sub every subreddit and do stupid things like comment when you're comment is a haiku. Every script kiddie that ever coded a broken bot that never worked right might still have 4 or 5 axcounts out there as a dead subscribers.

And let's not forget the massive amount of people with multiple accounts (hi!) and the ones with sometimes severe mental health problems, wannabe trolls, and straight up Aholes trying to evade bans. There's likely more of these out there than actual malicious and active bots.

As for actual malicious bots posting, it's likely very few, and limited to engagement on larger subs to drop parts of a larger group of talking points. But the places that normally go for that kind of thing also don't mind hiring a bunch of Nigerian 419 scammers to be real humans posting from the bot accounts sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Voters? Probably 99%. Commenters though? Like actual bots and LLMs and stuff like that? Very few, 1% rounded up, I'd think. You're much more likely to encounter humans posing as unaffiliated random people as part of their job than LLMs doing the same.

load more comments
view more: next ›