this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
651 points (98.8% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

3677 readers
311 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 14 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago

Wow the 80s were real different. You could advertise as a swinger and it's just chill.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

The secret ninth rule of fight club

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

there’s something hauntingly poetic about the ebb and flows of human compassion coming together to form language that allows the marginalized to express their need for emancipation, only for the inevitable surge of encultured ableism to quell that spark and steal that language for its own purpose. over and over and over. what will break the cycle? will people with disabilities ever get to have a concrete hold on the words they use to describe themselves, or is this a permanent fixture in the world we are forcing onto the disabled?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

In the latest Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (DSM-5-TR), intellectual disability is the term that replaces mental retardation meaning mentally slow or delayed. Before mental retardation, it was mental deficiency implying there was something inferior. To me, there's no real difference between mental deficiency and intellectual disability. They are synonymous. Before the first DSM, a prominent doctor in the field of intelligence created a tiered system of intelligence that applied the labels moron, imbecile, and idiot (ordered higher to lower intelligence). Those words became derogatory too. The issue is not that scientists can't guess the correct term that wont become an insult.

The issue is that society defines values for people which allows terms to be insults. As long as oppression exists, the vulnerable will fall victim to it. The disabled, by definition, will always be part of the vulnerable group. Additionally, oppression is always justified by arguments on who deserves what, whether it be religion, race, sex, social class, work ethic, or intelligence. As long as we hold the value that inequitable distribution is not only acceptable but the ultimate goal of a just society, then regardless of the rules we establish, however noble or virtuous, the disabled will always be part of the oppressed, and thus, the terms for lower intelligence will continually evolve from neutral to derogatory.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago

As long as we hold the value that inequitable distribution is not only acceptable but the ultimate goal of a just society, then regardless of the rules we establish, however noble or virtuous, the disabled will always be part of the oppressed, and thus, the terms for lower intelligence will continually evolve from neutral to derogatory.

Preach! 🗣️🗣️🔥

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

The deaf seem to own it. They made up their own language and ableism can't do shit.

But that is the only exception I can think of. (And they are really independent).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Mostly because we don't give a shit what the hearing say about us

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

We were commenting on your nice shoulders but that's fine 😭

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

excellent point! i hope for a future where the same patterns can work for the good of all disabled identities

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah that haunting poetry kicks ass.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As I get older, I have more and more sympathy for people who can’t keep up with socially acceptable terminology. At the same time, I have less and less tolerance for people who deliberately use outdated, insulting language.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Insisting that people speak a certain way is like insisting that women wear dresses. It's so fundamentalist

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Skibidy truth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Spoken like a true neurodivergent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Give it a few more years and then "mentally disabled" will be the new retarded. We'll cringe at how people would say they're "disabled".

I work with the mentally disabled and have for a while now. I love my guys but it's so annoying seeing how new terms will come and go throughout the years constantly.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The Euphemism Treadmill might stop when the term is so clinically dry as "mentally disabled". It doesn't exactly roll off the tongue of a schoolyard bully the way "retarded" does. I dunno, we'll see.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I thought they already changed it to differently abled. As dis-abled implies they can't do something, when differently implies they can do things, yet they may just do it in another manner.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

retarded doesn't have any more negative meaning than disabled. it's just about how we use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Ha. That's retarded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Well it's all in the mind of the interpreter. So if you live in a society of self-indulgent solipsists, you gotta respect that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

It just gets shortened to disabled. I've seen it used countless times as an insult.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure that "mentally retarded" was the medical term for many decades, before it became cultural lingo. There was something similar for erectile dysfunction too, they used to call you impotent, not exactly a great thing to hear at the doctor's office.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: word usage changes over time. For example, "idiot" used to be a technical medical term for extreme mental disability. We live in the Age of Information, and if somebody doesn't want to learn about historical context that's actually willful ignorance on their part.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

gum ball machine Saw this at a consignment shop a couple months ago, from about that same time period.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Reminds me of the slow children signs around neighborhoods. Every time my brain thinks... Are the kids to slow to get out of the way, or are they to mentally slow to know to not play in traffic. Then I remember I'm to mentally slow to realize it's me who is supposed to slow for the children but there is no punctuation so I just chuckle.

Actually I wonder if my neighbors would like it if I put this sign out front

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where can I get one of these shirts..I love it..anyone own a printing press?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

All things are possible with the help of a local maker space

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

That was simply the euphemism du jour, on the eternal euphemism treadmill.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Here's my random two cents about disability euphemisms.

I personally think "special", which was pretty popular like 10 years ago, was/is pretty demeaning. Even the more recent "differently-abled" feels weird.

I think the plain language of "disability", which seems to have been around quite a while now, is fine. It's what is says on the tin, without judgement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why does everyone assume it's "eternal" or "never ending"? Each time the euphemisms change, it's due to more inclusivity, more empathy, and more attempts to understand the plight of others. It's reasonable to assume that it'll stop at a point when we reach the right terms. It probably has already, and I just can't think of any examples off the top of my head...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Each time the euphemisms change, it’s due to more inclusivity, more empathy, and more attempts to understand the plight of others.

True if the terminology becomes more accurate, but a euphemism for euphemism's sake is the equivalent of sweeping dirt under a rug.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I am so glad you posted this. Sometimes I get into little arguments about word usage and younger folk truly don't understand how not only commonplace word usage that is considered some sort of insult now but how officially they were used. Near me was a place that helped folks with all sorts of independent living including housing and job training and just counseling and it was called the NSAR and Im almost sure the R was retardation. Think it changed its name and I can't find anything on it now but I did find like this https://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels2/pdf/70s/70/70s-WWH-NARC.pdf

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah the Euphemism Treadmill. Live long enough and words we use today for intellectual disability will become inappropriate too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Whenever medical science came up with a term to describe people with cognitive or intellectual impairments, it eventually became used as a derogatory insult. The R word was going out for a long time before Rosa's Law put the mail in the coffin.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›