this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1562 readers
64 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If I want to save something I'll back it up myself. My attitude toward an OS remembering what I do: "We don't know each other and I was never here."
What a surprise, the spy software is spying on you.
Maybe by "sensitive information" they mean theirs.
Let me try: hunter5
Must be working, all I see is ●●●●●●●
bash.org ftw
I put on my wizard hat and robe.
Although not the exact topic covered in the article, as you wouldn't necessarily be sending sensitive information like that to other people, but it's important to note that this means nothing you've sent before is safe.
It's not enough that from "now on" you don't send anything you wouldn't want Recall to capture, if you've already sent it and someone with Recall captures it then it's compromised. It's not just your own device that you need to worry about, it's also everyone you might contact or have ever contacted.
Prompt injection acrobatics via cortana playing sounds from a hacked speaker
We all saw that coming.
steamOS cannot come any sooner for desktop
You don't need SteamOS. It's likely not going to solve any problems for you that aren't solved elsewhere. It'll be good for console-like devices, but just use a normal desktop distro for a desktop computer.
I like Garuda Dragonized for gaming. It comes set up with a lot of gaming stuff already, and makes it easy to install a bunch of other gaming related packages you may want.
Theres no need to wait for Valve. The problem is solved already.
eh? I tried gaming with lutris fairly recently and I'd call it far from solved.
it's in a better spot than a decade ago
Im excited to live in that world.
Any game that relies on BS DRM like Denuvo that refuses to work for SteamOS can die in a fire.
Most of the are shitty multiplayer games anyways.
next PC upgrade won't feature any Intel or Nvidia, full AMD full glorious Linux under steamOS hopefully
There's so many others you can use right now.
Most of the distros run steam great out of the box. Our biggest problem is video card updates breaking crap. Linux Tech Tips scared a bunch of people off by not reading a warning message on an update then refusing to seek any help when something broke.
Since the first steam machine in 2008 it's all I've ever wanted....
I'm using bazzite for now in lieu of that
Microsoft: there won’t be bugs
This isn't a bug. It is by design
You have to be truly an idiot these days to still be using Windows.
Or maybe that's all you know
That doesn't make you an idiot
Or you're at work, or you need to collaborate with people who use Windows-only software. Or you bought a computer and it came with Windows, and you don't know about installing other operating systems.
And as long as that group of people you just described continues to uncritically accept everything MS does, they have no motivation to do things differently.
I hate that argument so much. It's like picturing me incapable of choosing a car because I know nothing about them.
"Why did you buy that garbage?" "It was the first vehicle at the first car dealer I found."
If you go to different car dealers you find many different cars so you have to look into their pros and cons before choosing one. If you go to different computer shops you find Windows computers, Macs and Chromebooks. Macs are very expensive and Chromebooks are very limited, so you buy a Windows machine. People don't even know what Linux is, and you can't really blame them. They just want a machine to do everyday stuff with, and not to have to invest too much time or money in finding one.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
Where else am I throw the computer, a wall?
What do you gotta be to think bajillions of people are idiots? Besides cripplingly cynical
load more comments
(1 replies)
This this more of a by product of the design than anything.
Its almost like this was a bad idea to begin with.
Man the first hackers to get their hands on that data are gonna get rich. Blackmail material, personal details, banking information, passwords, everything you could want.
Microsoft really cares about security
As long as it doesn't get in the way of money
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Every year I'm happier and happier that I touch MS products only when paid to do so.
problems with their shit has been paying the bills here for over twenty-five years now.
How happy are you to know your personal data is still going to be leaked because 90% of the services handling it are using MS Backdoor OS? If it's not going to be your bank it will be your work, if not your work, then it will be your government, and there will be no consequences because "nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft®"™.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›