this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

World News

394 readers
264 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a shame, I thought they were better than us with how quickly they stepped up to squash the coup.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah. kicking him out seems a no brainer.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Same could be said for convicting trump of impeachment, but here we are, term 2 electric boogaloo

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

yeah but as someone commented. thought south koreans would show more sense than us with trump and uk with brexit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, "Impeaching" a president literally just means holding a trial. The House of Representatives (controlled by Democrats at the time) issued articles of Impeachment, initiating the process of charging him with a crime, as is required by law.

The law also mandates the Senate to be the Judge and Jury though, and the Senate was controlled by Republicans, who voted to acquit him of all his crimes. Twice.

So not quite the same, since the vote to end martial law in Korea was unanimous, but the vote to initiate impeachment failed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Voting to end martial laws was not unanimous.

It was 190 out of 300, 110 of which weren't able to get in the building.

Impeachment in South Korea requires 2/3 supermajority, then it goes to the Supreme Court.

The president's party has 108 members in the national assembly. They'd need 8 defectors from the party to impeach.

Then it goes to the Supreme Court, which is probably the easier step compared to 2/3 of legislature.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah my bad, when I read the vote was 190-0, I assumed that was everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

When you think about it, in some ways it's not that unreasonable of an assumption. 300 - 110 (who couldn't get into the building) = 190 (who voted to end martial law)

If you could the votes of those who were actually present, then you could say it was unanimous.

That said, a PPP delegate who was going to vote against probably didn't have a whole lot of incentive to try and get into the building (suggesting the possibility that it might be reasonable to count at least some of the "unable to get in" folks as no votes).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Yoon did not offer to resign, but said he would leave decisions on how to stabilise the country to his party.

“I shit the bed, but I am honorable and trustworthy enough to let others clean it up for me.”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Braindead 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He did say he was sorry
/s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Braindead 3 points 2 weeks ago

I missed the nipple rubbing in his apology tho

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

He learned his lesson?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago