this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
-1 points (46.2% liked)

Conservative

410 readers
48 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd be interested in reading this bill as descendants of slaves is a wide net. Jewish people were slaves to the Egyptians, Slavs were enslaved by Romans and Spanish Muslims, Irish enslaved by the English. I'm sure just about all Americans have a slave descendent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Last time they worded reparations to exclude white appearing people of black ancestry, which is just outright racism IMO. It's either to make amends for the systemic oppression of your ancestors, which resulted in you personally having a harder time in life, or its not. California made it clear with that distinction that it's not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

A California lawmaker said he will introduce a bill

Non-story so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I thought California was a free state.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You know, this isn't a bad form of reparations. Public universities are owned by the state so it's not like you're forcing private citizens to give anyone anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Money taken via taxes is how universities are funded, funneling the money through a university doesn't change what it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And? College admission is not a good one can sell once they receive it. This isn't comparable to just giving ADOS people money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

A benefit of receiving a state subsidized education certainly has monetary value. If all the people who get in because of that law have to pay out of state tutition costs then your point has validity.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

If it can be proven, I have no issue with it. I’m not against reparations that make sense. I’d even be fine with a free education for one to two generations as a form of reparations.

What I’m against is an open wallet with no real goal or just a cash handout.