this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024

59 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1431 readers

115 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Whomp-whomp: AI PCs make users less productive (www.theregister.com)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross-posted from "Whomp-whomp: AI PCs make users less productive" by @along_[email protected] in [email protected]

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

nope, they're still figuring out how to use it. It's just THAT good.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

I’m pretty fucking tired of seeing all the ads for computers with integrated AI chips. You’re telling me you made an RV for the virtual dumbass and you want me to pay for it? Fuck off!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lack of familiarity with AI PCs leads to what the study describes as "misconceptions," which include the following: 44 percent of respondents believe AI PCs are a gimmick or futuristic; 53 percent believe AI PCs are only for creative or technical professionals; 86 percent are concerned about the privacy and security of their data when using an AI PC; and 17 percent believe AI PCs are not secure or regulated.

ah yeah, you just need to get more familiar with your AI PC so you stop caring what a massive privacy and security risk both Recall and Copilot are

lol @ 44% of the study’s participants already knowing this shit’s a desperate gimmick though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

you just need to get more familiar with your AI PC

they haven’t released autoplag sexbots yet

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Remember when normies couldn’t even find what they wanted via normal web searches?

This seems like that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maybe it was a mistake to lionize a corporate monopolist to the level where we ostracized people for not being “good” at using their trap of a product

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My school had a class in the early 2000's on how to use a search engine. It certainly wasn't just about Google, at the time.

Are you telling me you never had that painful experience watching someone else use a computer to perform a search and struggle to find basic things? It's possible to be "bad" at it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

in the early 2000s*

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

congrats on asking jeeves

is it bad to be bad at a system designed for exploitation? maybe your grandma had a point

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does three word normie mean to you

[+] [email protected] -8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

People who struggle to find basic things via web searches. That is, before the somewhat recent ratcheted up enshitification.

Generally, people who don't know how to work with the systems. As it relates to newer LLM search tools, not knowing how to prompt it correctly to get the desired output, knowing the limitations of LLMs to prevent you from doing something stupid, and knowing to check the sources that most of these LLMs provide before fully trusting the info it provides.

Normies are the ones microwaving their phones after 4chan encouraged them to which happened way before LLMs were spitting out sometimes bad info. Those are the same people who are going to eat glue or whatever the LLM says because it read too much Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

We've come so far and yet some things never change: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25J3u3P-HHg

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People who struggle to find basic things via web searches. That is, before the somewhat recent ratcheted up enshitification

This is you: LLMs are good, except they are enshittifying search, which follows from the fact that LLMs are bad. But actually, even though they are bad, I know how to use them, so LLMs are good, actually. Normies are dumb and I’m better than them and it doesn’t matter if search is good or bad, normies r dumb and normies will never learn to google good which they can learn from me, a LLM understander who is very smart

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You misunderstood me.

The enshitification I was referring to is the increasingly bad, non LLM search results Google is returning.

I've said this elsewhere but a good 90% of my searches don't involve LLM results whatsoever.

Normies also don't seem to know what should stay a "standard" search (most searches, IMO) and what might be useful to utilize an LLM for.

I think your response is a bit aggressive TBH.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think your response is a bit aggressive TBH.

nah, an aggressive response is me telling you to fuck yourself as I ban you for a second(!) time for making these exact terrible fucking posts

I’ve saved many hours of work with it, in languages I don’t really even know.

maybe by next ban you’ll figure out why your PRs keep getting closed

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

fucking imagine coming back to a place you’re not welcome with this “eeehhh you’re being a bit aggressive tbh” shit

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's just googling with several wildly pointless extra steps of also googling.