this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
211 points (96.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43877 readers
1400 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I's heard news that BlueSky has been growing a lot as Xitter becomes worse and worse, but why do people seem to prefer BlueSky? This confuses me because BlueSky does not have any federalization technologies built into it, meaning it's just another centralized platform, and thus vulnerable to the same things that make modern social media so horrible.

And so, in the hopes of having a better understanding, I've come here to ask what problems Mastodon has that keep people from migrating to it and what is BlueSky doing so right that it attracts so many people.

This question is directed to those who have used all three platforms, although others are free to put out their own thoughts.

(To be clear, I've never used Xitter, BlueSky or Mastodon. I'm asking specifically so that I don't have to make an account on each to find out by myself.)


Edit:

Edit2: (changed the wording a bit on the last part of point 1 to make my point clearer.)

From reading the comments, here are what seems to be the main reasons:

  1. Federation is hard

The concept of federation seems to be harder to grasp than tech people expected. As one user pointed out, tech literacy is much less prevalent than tech folk might expect.

On Mastodon, you must pick an instance, for some weird "federation" tech reason, whatever that means; and thanks to that "federation" there are some post you cannot see (due to defederalization). To someone who barely understands what a server is, the complex network of federalization is to much to bare.

BlueSky, on the other hand, is simple: just go to this website, creating an account and Ta Da! Done! No need to understand anything else.

~~The federalized nature of Mastodon seems to be its biggest flaw.~~

The unfamiliar and more complex nature of Mastodon's federalization technology seems to be its biggest obstacle towards achieving mass adoption.

  1. No Algorithm

Mastodon has no algorithm to surface relevant posts, it is just a chronological timeline. Although some prefer this, others don't and would rather have an algorithm serving them good quality post instead of spending 10h+ curating a subscription feed.

  1. UI and UX

People say that Mastodon (and Lemmy) have HORRIBLE UX, which will surely drive many away from Mastodon. Also, some pointed out that BlueSky's overall design more closely follows that of Twitter, so BlueSky quite literally looks more like pre-Musk Xitter.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

I think the problem is Mastodon makes it hard to find people to follow. I can’t even find mainstream media official accounts, let alone an actual celebrity. The discovery features need to be improved.

Meanwhile on BlueSky I instantly see every major news outlet in my main feed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 minutes ago

For me, this is a feature. The last thing I want is celebrities and news outlets clogging up my feed of nice people’s sandwiches and cat pictures.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 57 minutes ago

For me it's that more people I wanted to follow are now on blue sky but I have both. I have been liking the community on blue sky a little more.

I never used twitter though so what do I even know lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

federation could be abstracted away, much the same way filesystems are right now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Perhaps... But how exactly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Initial log in in the apps should default to mastodon.social with other servers buried under a menu

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

i wish i had that answer

its usually how corpos and ux people seem solve these issues

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yhea your first mistake is thinking that 99% give a flying fuck about federation

It just makes it's more complex to adopt

Bluesky ?

Go on there, sign-up, done

Everything works.

Nothing else to do. Nothing to understand.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The lemmy devs should add a feature to their website where you can just create and account and it creates and account on an instance that is closest geographically to the IP address you are connecting from and is federated with the most servers.

Single place for normies to make an account and they don't have to think about the federation bits, but if they get interested they can always make an account manually on another instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

That would be helpful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

This is the only correct answer.

It's easy to get on and it works just like Twitter. People don't even need to understand what Federation is to get up and running on the platform.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

I'd say its because less people probably know of mastodon then bluesky, since on Twitter everyone seems to be making a bluesky account but no one a mastodon account which would result in less people knowing about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

the instances I join keep collapsing and getting deleted

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

ah thank u, it is a bit silly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Twitter is evil

Mastodon has bad UX

BlueSky is fresh

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This confuses me because BlueSky does not have any federalization technologies built into it,

Bluesky is designed to be federated though. It's just not fully available yet. Also, Bluesky is open-source, licensed under the MIT license.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Really? This is the first time I'm hearing all of this /g

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

On Mastodon, you must pick an instance, for some weird "federation" tech reason, whatever that means;

On email, you must pick a server, for some weird "server" reason, whatever that means;

It's literally no different than deciding "should I go with Gmail or ~~hotmail~~ ~~msn~~ ~~yahoo~~" fuck ok I guess there really is only one email provider now. Huh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yahoo and AOL email are both still around and relatively widely used, and there's plenty more that aren't ran by large companies, like FastMail.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I'm sorry if it wasn't clear, but that was a joke. I am indeed aware of the existence of other email services.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Most people don't know much, and don't care that they don't know much. Half of US adults can't read at a 6th grade level. They don't care about and probably do not understand complex topics.

That's it. They just want cat gifs, and that's the end of the thought.

I knew someone who was smart and successful and politically aware. She didn't care about any of this. She was tired from work and just wanted the familiar ease or twitter. Trying to figure out which server to sign up for and finding content was too much work.

A lot of people have executive dysfunction. Making a choice is hard.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ICastFist 10 points 13 hours ago

Bluesky has brand recognition (founded by the same dude as Twitter), more people and "feels like twitter", in the sense of what you see, more than mastodon. Also, news outlets seem to be migrating there.

Mastodon (and pleroma, misskey, etc) is seen as a place for weirdos and techies, with "nothing interesting going on". Several people mentioned this already one way or another, but that most servers/instances are "specific" about whatever means that people will feel that they might miss out on something by choosing the wrong server.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Simple - because it's not Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Instead of comparing these smaller platforms together to find out why one is better or not people should be focusing on why xitter and Facebook are still two of the most popular forms of social media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Bro do you really think common people know all about this open source interconnected stuff. Get out of your linux bubble

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

Easy.

  1. No one outside of the fediverse bubble gives a fuck about federation. It solves a problem no one has, and offers no real solutions to problems users have.

  2. Mastodon offers nothing on the Twitter experience outside of "but it's federated"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

The only reason is the sign up/UX thing. Maaaaybe. And now a critical mass is there

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because they miss the algorithm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Nice profile picture!

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί