Well the good news for progressives is you'll likely see Thomas and maybe Alito retire during Trump's next term. The bad news is they'll be replaced by 35-year-old strict-constructionist Constitutional conservatives.
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
168 points (97.2% liked)
News
23275 readers
3812 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah and if Sotomayer pulls a Ginsberg, suddenly Trump gets three picks, effectively forcing a radically right-wing court for at least the next 40 years.
The real tragedy of Trump being elected is that this effectively ends any chance of reforming the court. Gen Z will basically be in their 60s before there is any chance of balancing the court let alone swinging it left.
The is McConnell's wet dream and has been his entire career. Unfortunately, his dream came true.
But hey, at least we maintained our ideological purity
And eggs might be 5 cents cheaper
Nah they won't
I gave up my human rights and all i got in return was 5 cents
Not even constitutional conservatives... it'll be theocratic authoritarians...
That won’t matter when the newly Republican controlled Congress expands and packs SCOTUS a la Project 2025.
They won't be strict constructionists. The Heritage Foundation doesn't endorse strict constructionists. They endorse whatever the hell supports their individual needs of the individual moments. They have no guiding principles or morals.
Yes, but Trump has/had been taking legal marching orders from the Federalist Society which does support a strict read, no?
No. We should all be aware of that by now. They claim to have a strict read, when it's convenient for them. We've seen undeniable proof from this very Supreme Court, from Samuel Alito in particular, that they will completely abandon that principle whenever they feel like.
"and opposition from Senator Joe Manchin"
The most repeated phrase ever. At least that piece of shit will be gone, but now an actual Republican took his place.
I'm ultimately glad, he was giving democrats a bad name. We could afford that a decade ago, but we no longer can.
There's a mild reshuffling of the parties happening, with the Tulsi Gabbards switching to red and the Adam Kinzingers switching to blue, and I'm fine with it. It's about priorities. Which parts of your platform and beliefs are more important than the other parts?
with the Tulsi Gabbards switching to red and the Adam Kinzingers switching to blue
Ugh, a future of having to choose between Russian agents and fucking tea partiers sounds bleak as hell, we've gotta be able to do better than that
Yes, I think we can.
But remember, during WW2 the USSR and the US were able to cooperate to defeat fascism. We cannot be too picky when it comes to alliances when there's bigger fish to fry. Ideological purity is not our friend, never has been. Even if that makes everything a confusing pain in the ass, which it does, that diversity of opinion is necessary if we are going to robustly pursue our goals and not get too stuck up our own asses and blinded.
We didn't let the USSR decide our troop deployments for us, and we didn't tell everybody what a great guy Stalin was to sell war bonds. When it comes to potential voters, I agree with you we can't be picky (like, if they've got a problematic stance on trans people or women or people receiving welfare or whatever I'll try to politely and succinctly tell them why what they're saying hurts to hear and then steer the conversation back to the many many things we do agree on), but when it comes to the people we put on stages, the people we elect, and the people who advise elected officials on policy and campaigns the Manchins and Kinzingers and Cheneys of the world are poison who will only lose us votes.
I understand the sentiment, but I'm not so sure it's actually true. We'll have to see how many left leaning folks came out for Harris, percentage-wise. Not counting Gaza uncommitteds, they're a different story imo.
It's all about the data though, nobody cares about sentiments or online complaints, it has to be hard numbers to actually convince people.
Wonder who the new Manchin is gonna be.
There’s no point now. Anything they try to do will be blocked and be labeled lame duck president bullshit. It sucks but it’s reality. No point in trying to shake things up now. We can only pray the liberal judges stay alive until 2029
And that there are any more elections
Biden should expand the god damned court
Dude sat on his ass for 4 years and did next to nothing. You think he'll do anything now?
If he expanded the court now Republicans would just block his judicial appointments until he's out of office.
Our biggest mistake was hoping that democrats were progressive and not just another part of the oligarchs
It's a big tent, the people in charge of the party right now suck but there are lots of good lawmakers and staffers in there
And there could be a lot more if people didn't sit on their ass and refuse to put in work to fix the only party we have a shot at taking over.
Hahaha AS IF. The right can stonewall and delay confirmation for 2 months without blinking an eye. Can probably do it in their sleep
They just have to be confirmed by the majority of the Senate. If every Democrat goes to confirm, there is nothing Republicans can do.
Is Sotomayor that old/unhealthy?
She's only 70(born 1954), unless there are health issues I'm unaware of idk why this article is trying to cause more worry/fear.
She has T1 diabetes but I'm assuming it's well managed.
Oh damn. Even managed t1d lowers lifespan by about 12 years. So average female t1d lifespan is only 68. She's certain to have much better management than the average person though.
I think the specter of RBG is still looming large.
It'd have to be one hell of a nominee to get through the process before Chirstmas break.
Coney Barrett was confirmed in 39 days. If the whole caucus was on board it could definitely be done, but Sinema would probably sell us out.
I think she can make it another four years. Ginsberg actively had cancer when she refused to resign. I think there's a difference here, and she's easily the best member of the court on pretty much every issue.
It'd be an absolutely stupid thing to even attempt. And Lord knows we need her right where she is. Hang on honey.
That institution is rotten to the core. No amount of this is going to fix it.