Flutter

643 readers

1 users here now

Flutter and the related logo are trademarks of Google LLC. We are not endorsed by or affiliated with Google LLC

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

[email protected]

Maybe we should have switched to C#, , or @slint, instead of porting from #Qt5 to #Qt6. (mastodon.green)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/flutter

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Maybe we should have switched to C#, @flutter, or @slint, instead of porting from #Qt5 to #Qt6.

@qt

#Programming #CPlusPlus #Sigh

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@taschenorakel @flutter @slint @qt I'll always argue for #rust + #slint, but I am heavily biased.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@hunger I'd argue this team here lacks the required skill level to take advantage from Rust. (Well, and I lake the patience for Rust's compile times).

I still like alot what you guys are doing.

@flutter @slint @qt

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@taschenorakel @flutter @slint @qt #rust is not that hard for a C++ dev IMHO... the biggest change is that you need to learn to trust the compiler: It does have a point when it flags something, even when you go "that is wrong, I do that in C++ all the time and it never caused any problem".

Compile times are not that much worse than C++ and are actually improving -- slowly.

But #slint has great #cpp support, too, so just use that till your team is ready to adopt rust.