this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
326 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2630 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

People aren't having more babies if the economy is bad... Which it is in China

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Gonna leave this here from a reply I made to a similar thread weeks ago. China's demographics are in very bad shape.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This was mostly created by the one child policy that ran from 1979-2016, coupled with male child preference. In China, a male child is responsible for taking care of his own parents, while females are responsible for caring for their in-laws.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In large part yes, but younger generations are also not especially motivated to have kids when they already have to deal with a soul-crushing workplace (much worse than in the west).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The famous 996, they have this work culture from 9 AM to 9 PM, 6 days a week. Good luck having any power left after such a week.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh God really? My work is already pretty soul crushing, I couldn't imagine

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's bad. There are fewer worker protections and unions are illegal.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Unions are illegal in a Communist state? That's hilariously ironic and sad.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is one mega-union (the only permitted one) with officials appointed by the CCP. It's essentially a sham, like the non-CCP parties in Congress that are nominally a type of opposition but can never hold any real power.

And yes, it is ironic and sad. Nordic countries are more communist than China is. China doesn't even have truly free healthcare like Canada etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Chinese Unions are a joke, it is common practice that union preventatives would trying to convince you to be more understanding of your boss.

It's a well known joke that the only reason Chinese Union exists is to prevent real unions to form (you want a worker union? but we already have one, go talk to them).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

You see, it's not communism, but communism with Chinese ideals (therefore whatever the heck the CCP wants it to be)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

It's not communist, it's just a nazi state with a different name.

All the rest applies, the racial bits, the cruelty and genocide, all of it.

No, I lie, the nazis didn't execute nearly as many of their own people, nor did they restrict reproduction in the same way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

10x worse, you work 12 hours min and you work Saturdays, plus the boss is a lot more... Personally cruel than they are here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If it was just that, surely there'd be a rebound visible on the chart after 2016 (8-year-olds and younger)? Instead it falls off even harder

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At this point the culture had shifted to not value large families and so few even think it is possible while not having kids seems like a valid option. It takes years to shift this even with an effort to encourage kids.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Not making your society a dystopian hellscape might help.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

They can't get married till they have a house, and there are problems there...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They also have a level of youth unemployment above 20%. Between a fifth and a quarter of those Zoomers are unemployed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its' so bad that they stopped publishing unemployment rate few years back, there are many talks of university students where they have to fill form about their future plans and whether they already received job offers, the teachers would encourage them to open a online store and fill the form as store owner/self employed.

[–] RarePossum 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's so bad they revised how they were measuring it to make it look better.

And then it continued to go up anyway

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

They invented a new term "negative growth" so they won't have to use "decline".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder whether they're expecting to lose a significant number of young men for some reason over the next few years as well. Gotta start planning for replacements early.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Honestly I don't think that is necessary to explain this. China is seeing the same issue as western countries with birth rates way below replacement, but it hardly has any of the immigration that mitigates it for (most of) Europe and North America. It's not easy for an economy to support an ever-increasing proportion of its population being retirees

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Government: Hello there Ji-Mun we have found 12 perfect bachelors for you to choose from. You must complete copulation by December. Here are their bios for your review we'll call you in 3 hours for your final engagement letter. Don't worry, marriage is not necessary.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They are practicing this in India if I am not wrong, but it is done by the parents. They are collecting CVs of prospective partners and sharing them with their kids. So it is like Tinder for parents kind of.

I also have a Pakistani colleague and he told me that they have a dating app, but for marriages. You see the profile of the girl/boy, where they share how many kids they want to have, etc.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is also very prevalent in Chinese society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yep and it never ends well but they end up staying together because divorce is looked down upon in all but the most liberal communities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish I was kidding, but what are the chances that China will become the first country to mass produce their new population via in vitro?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (7 children)

That still requires a surrogate at least, no in vitro can support all the way to viability yet. There would also need to be post-birth support for the kids to be useful to soxiety. Also essentially admitting the existing men aren't capable of having children. Expensive af too, so seems improbable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They'll probably just have paid surrogates.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Have they tried letting Chinese citizens be free from totalitarianism the first time in their entire history?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I completely seriously, put forth that it's the soul-crushing, rampant late-stage capitalism, with poor worker protections, much more than the lack of political freedom, is what is driving the low birth rates. (Now, obviously different story during one child policy).

I just think people are way to quick to overlook the economics, which is currently happening almost everywhere (the stupid house prices, real wages not keeping up with price inflation, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest of a nation getting larger, etc)

If China became a mutli-party representative democracy overnight, you can bet your ass no one is going to be having any more children than they are right now.

If you were to ask the average Chinese person if they support their government, the answer would be yes, despite what some people outside China would like to believe. (On average, of course there are still a notable number who aren't happy at all with the government).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Best I can do is more restrictions on travel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

Same energy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Well, we will know things will have gotten real bad when they start approaching sex offenders for fertility studies in an Operation Paperclip type arrangement

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What's the opposite of forced abortions? Because given the history of the CCP that could be where this is heading.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Rape. Don't let anyone sugar coat it with any other word.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Which is why they're calling girls as young as 15.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

What’s the opposite of forced abortions? Because given the history of the CCP that could be where this is heading.

Decree 770

"Decree 770 was a decree of the communist government of Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, signed in 1967. It restricted abortion and contraception, and was intended to create a new and large Romanian population."

"To enforce the decree, society was strictly controlled. Contraceptives were removed from sale and all women were required to be monitored monthly by a gynecologist.[3]: 6  Any detected pregnancies were followed until birth. The secret police kept a close eye on hospital procedures. "

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A consequence of Ceaușescu's natalist policy is that large numbers of children ended up living in orphanages, because their parents could not cope with looking after them. The vast majority of children who lived in the state-run orphanages were not actually orphans, like the name implies, but simply children whose parents could not afford or did not want to look after them.

So it often comes back to the economics of the situation. Kids used to make money, helping on the farm and stuff. Now kids cost a lot of money and paying women a substantial amount (and not the pizza party amounts) to have children is deemed economically nonviable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Decree 770 [...] signed in 1967

Gen X in Romania is actually replaced by "decreței" - loosely translated as children of the decree. About 20 years later, they'd be just old enough to take part in the revolution that brought about Ceaușescu's execution and fast replacement with a former chief of the communist party's propaganda department, who had strong ties to Moscow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

That's an interesting bit of info I never knew. Thank you for sharing that.

load more comments
view more: next ›