this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
427 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 146 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Soooooo

The right-wing reporters realize he means them too, right?

Eventually, you slip up and lose favor with the GröpenFührer then, out the window you go.

They realize that. Right?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Of course they don't. He hates the people they hate. And when he hates them, they'll hate themselves, too.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago

They'll never lose favor, only the other will.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Something something… leopards.. faces…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Forget about the nominally right wing media, look at how the NY Times have covered every threat to democracy, ever. From Hitler to the business plot to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is the mistake people always make with an autocrat. They the think they’ll be allowed to keep or amass the power the have, but only one person is allowed power in an autocratic regime.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This dude is only becoming more of a nightmare the closer we get to election day

[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

just wait until you see what he's like after election day!

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True. Doesn't matter if he wins or loses. He'll claim he won no matter the results and he'll be equally crazy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

and he’ll be equally crazy.

Equally? That seems optimistic. He'll go even farther off the deep end. Even if he wins, he'll contest it, because he clearly should have won by a larger margin.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Unfortunately that profile in courage Jeff Bezos is more concerned about Trump potentially messing with his government contracts than threatening to have Washington Post reporters killed.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump's backers, and especially Peter Thiel, whom JD Vance is an avatar for (Thiel put forward Vance as VP to Trump, and had sponsored Vance's entire political career, which is only two years old), all read Curtis Yarvin.

Yarvin is Silicon Valley's chosen "philosopher" - he advocates for the end of democracy and a return to monarchy, with billionaires as royalty and monarchs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

You don't get to where he is by caring about other people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Stop giving Bezos the benefit of the doubt. There is no evidence that he's doing shit in Trump's favor for any reason other than that he likes fascism and wants to support it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually always believed that Bezos was a Democrat, given his ownership of the Post, which has always had a clear anti-Trump message. I think it’s more plausible that he was scared of retaliation or that the GOP has something on him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's a fair argument. It's very circumstantial and not enough to convince me, though, especially if the Post was liberal before he bought it and it simply remained so through his inaction (which I believe to be the case -- correct me if I'm wrong!). The rebuttal to "he must be liberal: he owns a liberal newspaper" is "yeah, but the first time he intervened in it, it was to force it to be more conservative."

[–] Isoprenoid 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"There is no evidence that Bezos favors Trump. Apart from the fact that Bezos favors what Trump supports."

My brother in Christ, do you read what you write?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Do you? Because the first half of your misquote was exactly the opposite of what I actually said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

you misread their comment

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Go to jail you orange turd.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Believe people when they show you what they really are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

It really sucks that everybody voting for trump is not your friend, even if you think they are. It's just too many people for that to happen to.