this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
427 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19125 readers
3488 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They were. They made a 'no shit they shall not pass' line and as soon as the first MAGA fucked around, they found out.

[–] Isoprenoid 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shortening Secret Service to SS sure seems weird when nazis are threatening to take hold of power. Caught me off guard.

[–] Isoprenoid 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Whoops, genuinely didn't mean to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am undecided wether pointing that out was necessary. I just made an offhand comment and you did too. I did not think you were implying something. Hope I didn't cause distress.

[–] Isoprenoid 2 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, you're right to have pointed it out, especially because of the circumstances. No distress here. ☮

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think typically people use "USSS" for this reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure he's talking about Ashley babbit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Ashli_Babbitt

Ashli Babbitt got shot full on by the secret service after attempting to force entry into the Speakers' Lobby. After being repeatedly warned by secret service that they will be shot if they press forward, Zachary Alam broke the window and Babbitt attempted to rush in past the broken glass. Then she got shot. Big surprise.

[–] Isoprenoid 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ashli Babbitt got shot full on by the secret service

Ashli Babbitt isn't an example of the USSS taking down a threat. Your source claims:

she was shot in the left shoulder by a United States Capitol Police (USCP) officer.

The USCP isn't the USSS (by my understanding, which is based on Wiki). I understand that the USSS were present at Jan 6 though, so your point stands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, actually, that's a pretty solid point. I missed that detail. Thanks for pointing that out.