this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
79 points (90.7% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1103 readers
172 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What the heck are C2de and abc1-households?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'll try again in reply to the roght comment: "NRS social grade" is a UK demographics thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I didn't know that. Thanks for clarification!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

The search term you're after is NRS social grade. It's a UK demographics thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm curious about where they draw the line

Me personally its between dogs and rabbits.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 20 hours ago

I think you guys are misunderstanding what Brits mean by that... They value both very little.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of a weird question IMO. I don't even think animal lives are worth the same as animal lives. Is a single deer's life the same as a single ant's life?

I consider myself to be kind and thoughtful towards people and animals -- I'll save snails or worms that I find while gardening, but I also will kill mosquitos that are inside my house, and move spiders outside where they will potentially die.

This isn't even getting into "special" animals like pets

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

... but I also will kill mosquitos that are inside my house, and move spiders outside where they will potentially die.

huh, i just let the spiders be and they take out mosquitos and other bugs for me. we're symbiotico, that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

I'm scared of / uncomfortable with spiders, so they're not allowed inside

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Don't particularly love spiders, but I'll never kill one, even in my house.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I would also answer "Human lives are worth the same as animal lives", simply because Humans are animals.

Never trust the answers to questionnaires with such basic mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

You know what it means, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'd like to see the results from the question : I have a gun pointed at your long time childhood friend and one pointed at this cow, now is this cow's life worth the same as your friends life?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

A better comparison would be if the human in question was a random dude you pulled off the streets. If this was a cow that I grew up with and shared a bond with, then yeah, I'd obviously pick the cow over some dude I don't know. If it's a childhood friend versus a random cow I don't know? Same thing but in reverse.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I have a gun pointed at your dog and another pointed at a guy that's going around eating people's pets...

You are mixing the rational component of the question in general with the emotional attachments of particular situations. This kind of "I know it in my heart" drive is the same that drives things like racism and xenophobia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Their point still works though, just reword it for less unnecessary baggage if you prefer.

Do you press the button which saves some random human somewhere in the world, or the button which saves some random cow? I'm pretty sure most people choose the human

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Most people would also press a button that will save a random human of their country over a random human from another country. Does that mean people have different value depending on which country they are from?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Interesting (or, perhaps, expected) that the more progressive/left leaning demographics correlate with a higher proportion valuing human and animal life equally. Sort of makes sense and I'm glad to see it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Then why do they kill and eat them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because humans are comically inconsistent and morally bankrupt. The history of our species is basically slavery, factory farms, and HOA’s.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

But if I do that, there'd probably be a big ceremony saying I'm a hero and I'd have to shake people's hands 😰

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Which animals hands do you think you’d need to shake?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

My dog, who is a very good boy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

My cat is worth more than a lot of humans.

Seriously, why no Liberal or Green voters?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

At least the Tories like somebody, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Animal welfare was actually a field they were quite progressive on, iirc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

The age trend makes this graph worthy of uplifting news community (as much as I don't like it).