this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
484 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

58997 readers
4216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

(page 4) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I feel like there has to be more to this problem than pure probability. We ought to consider practical nuances like the tendency to randomly mash keys that are closer together rather than assume a uniform distribution.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?

[–] 0x0 1 points 20 hours ago

And coffee breaks... or banana breaks... and unions!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder if it would take more or less time with auto-complete.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I just listened to a podcast about assembly theory and I think that it kind of relates here too, though maybe not. If we start randomly generating text that is the lenght of the Hamlet, then Hamlet itself would be one of the possible, finite number of possibilities that could be generated within these parameters. Interesting theory nevertheless.

If we think about a screwdriver, the theory would argue that it couldn’t simply appear out of nowhere because its structure is too specific and complex to have come into existence by chance alone. For that screwdriver to exist, a multitude of precise processes are required: extracting raw materials, refining them, shaping metal, designing the handle, etc. The probability of all these steps happening in the right order, spontaneously, is essentially zero. Assembly theory would say that each stage in the creation of a screwdriver represents a selection event, where choices are made, materials are transformed, and functions are refined.

What makes assembly theory especially intriguing is that it offers a framework to distinguish between things that could arise naturally, like a rock or even an organic molecule, and things that bear the hallmarks of a directed process. To put it simply, a screwdriver couldn't exist without a long sequence of assembly steps that are improbable to arise by chance, thereby making its existence a hallmark of intentional design or, at the very least, a directed process.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Are spelling and punctuation expected to be accurate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Infinity sorts it out for you, Karl

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait .......is this why AI exists? So we can type Hamlet in the face of monkey failures?

Dude. Just use a printer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Omg I just realized AI is the new monkeys.. that is disturbing

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›