this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
755 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

5145 readers
964 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So where are the "Republicans are good for the economy" voters now?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Anyone that actually cares about the economy would see that every time the republicans get in they fuck it, and every time the democrats get in they fix it.

But they don't care about reality, only their feelings

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

It's necessary for me not to have TSLAs price tank and the Saudis take recover loss out of me, pound-of-flesh style.

Or, probably how he's guilty of a ton of ITAR violations related to Saudis, SpaceX rockets, plus Russia and Starlink

[–] [email protected] 65 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make"

Why do we only seem to get the bad outlandish things from books and movies? :/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Honestly, aggressive climate change would have a similar short-term impact, even if the net result is good, which is a large part of the reason we don't do aggressive changes like this.

That said, I'm not convinced the net result is good, so we'll instead have short-term suffering followed by longer-term suffering, all for a bit of protectionism for American businesses (which will probably leave them worse off in the long run anyway).

[–] [email protected] 53 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

That graph is interesting. When was Reagan president again...?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago

When was Reagan president again…?

Nailed it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

81-89. I don't think Reagan's presidency or party really explains it, because we see it rise shortly and then fall, both during Bill Clinton's presidency (93-2001). So George H.W. Bush raised taxes during his term, and then Clinton cut them again, but did so while balancing the budget (Clinton ran a surplus).

Reagan certainly slashed taxes, but so did Clinton, and to a similar degree.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 16 hours ago

Necessary for Elon and trump to evade prison sentences.

These shitbags are trading the health of the majority to evade repercussions for their crimes (of which there are many).

Drone strike please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeeaahhh, OR we can just not be dumbfucks and actually work on the economy, Elon, you hack

[–] [email protected] 44 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

There is no middle class. There are workers and owners. If you own real estate and stonks you are still a worker unless you can live off of just investments. This is designed to corrupt and neuter you. You have enough skin in the game of the owners to not want to oppose them, but not enough to actually be them. Unless you hope to retire, at which point you make the transition from working class to owning class, but only at the end of your life, if you even make it that far, and often owning very little.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

This is why Worker and Consumer Cooperatives are so vital.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Shut up, shut up, shut up please just shtfu already elon. How are people like him and bezos controlling the world? I swear we celebrate and praise mediocre morons in the US.

As a nation we have lost 30 years of progress because we give the loudest most idiotic people to ever live a platform to spew their collective nonsense. Take me back to 2010 where the internet was still fun and not just some massive propaganda machine for the uber wealthy and political nut jobs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

He's never going to shut up. But people keep amplifying his pathetic voice by sharing what he says. There's a very large group of society that needs to stop sharing outrage fodder.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

In trump's case, we praise exceptional morons

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How are people like him and bezos controlling the world?

Capitalism

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Which is now, very very obviously, not a system design to promote it's own fitness, a la Darwinism...

I wonder what happens to piles of sand placed in the path of high-flowing rivers?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But without capitalism we wouldn't have (insert something that has nothing to do with capitalism but that I completely attribute to it). And that would mean no trade.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My ancestors wouldnt have pushed at least one Southern plantation owner to suicide.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I believe this is what they call based

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

They werent John Brown style abolitionists, they just got pissed off by a business associate and took it about as far as you would expect from a family who still consider themselves American-Scots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 177 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wait till he hears how necessary it is for life to get harder for billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That's why they're trying to take power. Billionaires would rather destroy the world and drive all life to extinction than to give up their private jets and yachts.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 1 day ago (5 children)

necessary for what?

necessary for what, motherfucker?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Protectionism. Musk stands to gain a ton if there's less competition from imported EVs, and that's true for a lot of other products that American companies make. If you can just throw a few million at a presidential campaign and essentially guarantee your competitors will have a 10-60% disadvantage, those few millions can turn into billions in profit.

On paper, the goal seems to be to spur companies to return to the US, but I think the net impact will be higher prices for Americans and reduced trade w/ other countries due to retaliatory tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Your comment has the same energy as "states' rights to do what?", and I'm here for it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Fascist cunt

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Trump is better at this than Musk...

It will be a beautiful necessary. Everyone will love the carnage. We will destroy America bigly. Like never before. The radical left democrats will hate it, but it will be glorious. Trust me.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago

The fucking gall this billionaire POS has to utter the phrase "live within our means."

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (5 children)

🗡️🫨

... there's no guillotine emojis yet

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

“Some of you may die, but that is a risk I am willing to make”

When can we feed Elon to a dragon?

load more comments
view more: next ›