this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
704 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19133 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 117 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's pretty smart. You know he would never do it.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He's just going to say "I'm the smartest person ever to be president, the doctor I paid said so. I took the test already: person, woman, man, camera, TV!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Technically 4 words, woman is a derivitive of man in their minds. Well 3 because person is gender neutral and can't have that either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And he keeps talking about the tests if he just took it. Which either means he can't really process the fact that it happened in the past anymore, or they really do have to test him often. Neither is a good look for anyone's grandpa, much less a grandpa who wants to run the free world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

It'd be smarter if they got him to actually do it, so I don't see your point... The man genuinely has dementia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

the same one she takes? so not the one that asked him to name a handful of things that conveniently happened to be around him when he talked about it to the press?

[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's wild that such intense questions like "Can you identify a giraffe?", "Can you draw a clock?", "Can you count backwards by 7s?", and "Who is the current president?" was apparently such a grueling ordeal for Donald that he's still bragging about it years later.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago

"Who is the current president?"

Yeah that one might be an issue for him..

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Can you count backwards by 7s

counting backwards in multiples of 7? i'd struggle with that and i consider myself at least average

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago

0, -7, -14, -22... dangit

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s probably like field sobriety tests, where how you struggle is relevant. If you miss one in a sequence, that says something different from repeatedly going up instead of down or counting backwards on your hands first.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It must be wild being in her position, being so overwhelmingly more capable than her opponent, and having to find out how to get stubborn people to acknowledge that and care about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hillary Clinton had joined the chat

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Definitely! I honestly had never thought of that because I didn't take Donald Trump seriously until he was projected to win on voting day. I was dumbfounded and blown away. It was a big wake up call for me about how I was out of touch with a large part of America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 days ago (6 children)

New debate idea: instead of political questions, have the whole thing hosted by a panel of psychologists who give a thorough assessment to both candidates live on stage.

At the end, they collectively review all findings and conclude the event by making any diagnosis the data merits.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

And their political affiliations would be somehow above questioning?

Have you met our Supreme Court?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Like with a TV Debate with Harris, he won't agree to this, as he knows that he has no chance to win.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She should disguise this test, and throw in basic questions about US history and politics. Trump will fail so hard it won't even be funny.

This is the guy who talked about the continental army in the 1700's invading airports. He's real fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No need to do that

The guy is struggling enough as it is

But you throw in questions about dictators and he'll know the answers better than he knows what state he's living in. It's possible the only book he's ever read is Mein kempf

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I've been dreaming of a Trump IQ test forever. I'm almost certain he would be below average. Someone should trick him to do one by saying it's the crypto bro club test that Harris failed or something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In fairness, "most" people his age would be below "average".

Edit: oh, apparently it doesn't work like that. 100 is supposed to be average regardless of age?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What color crayon do you reckon he would use to fill in the form?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The perfect crayon. It was the bigliest. It was so pretty, just like my daughter...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I feel like he'd lie and say he did the test already and he passed it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I want to see how they would perform on the SAT

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SAT is too much, most Americans remember that as too hard. I would be impressed if Trump just got a passing score on the Smarter Balanced Assessment

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

i remember when we elected presidents who had phds in constitutional law

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How about a high school civics test?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've been wondering why she doesn't invite both of them to take one.

These fucks blurt out all their motivations and weaknesses, you only need to aggressivey seize on them and hold their feet to the fire till they cry uncle

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Challenge Trump to a foot race for President since his supporters going around burning ballot boxes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She shouldn't even say this. Cognitive tests are for those showing signs of dementia. That trump took one at all is all that we need to know.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People do "cognitive tests" for all kinds of reasons. The kind for dementia is only one of a large variety of tests that fit in this very broad category.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›