this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19141 readers
2175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The podcaster and radio host also excoriated what he saw as the media's double standards and failure to convey the true danger of Trump's rhetoric.

In a clip that has gone viral on social media, Charlamagne, a popular podcaster and co-host of the nationally syndicated radio show The Breakfast Club, is asked by host Anderson Cooper about Trump's plan to appear on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast and whether Harris planned to do the same.

“I think that she should keep calling Donald Trump a fascist,” Charlamagne replied tersely.

He continued, “And I think that Americans need to keep looking at the rhetoric of Donald Trump because I don’t know why we’re even thinking about electing somebody who’s talking about putting people in camps. I don’t know why we’re talking, why we want to elect somebody who’s talking about mass deportation. I don’t know why we’re having this conversation about somebody who wants to terminate the constitution to overthrow the results of an election. Aren’t we supposed to be a patriotic country? Whenever somebody like Colin Kaepernick takes a knee in this country, everybody talks about, ‘Oh, that’s so unpatriotic.’ But a guy can say he wants to terminate the constitution to overthrow the results of an election and nobody cares?”

Addressing Cooper, Charlamagne said, “Now, you brought it back to Kamala and Joe Rogan, Anderson, who gives a damn?”

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is exactly the way Trump needs to be covered and while I don’t listen to Poscasts, it really makes me want to start.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Start with Cleanup on Aisle 45 instead of the Breakfast Club.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

it's fucking absurd where we are 12 days from the election. the fix is in, and those who claim to love this country, clearly hate it. I don't care what happens in the election, this nation is cooked.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anderson, being gay, should be especially vocal.

First they came for the "illegals"

Etc.

He is on whatever list of lists they have.

He may not be first in line, but he will be.

Fascism wants only a certain kind.

Anderson is not that kind.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

He's a fucking Vanderbilt, he'll be fine

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

He’s rich and can just leave though. The rest of us are the ones who’ll have to deal with this shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you are one of the most trusted voices on television,

He should have followed it up with "He's already threatened to have broadcast licenses pulled from a news network that did nothing more than fact check him. What do you think he'd do to you and yours if you don't report positively 24 hours a day?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

None of that matters because they made more money last time he was in office.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh, I didn't realize that I'm a fan of Charlemagne tha God

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Same. I don't even listen to podcasts, but it looks like I'm about to start

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Hollywood Reporter - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Hollywood Reporter:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/charlamagne-tha-god-slams-cnn-bullshit-trump-coverage-1236045128/
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/t/anderson-cooper/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Cooper can suck on a turd. Cause all he does is spew shit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

CNN feigns ignorance of the Overton window. They give a platform to viewpoints that are specifically designed to stir controversy, and in the process, they move the window to the right, bit by bit, all in the service of the almighty dollar.

This is why we can't have nice things.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

They got bought out by fox news lackey types because they wanted a thinner wedge for their nazi bullshit. They haven't been legitimate for a couple years now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Come on and SLAM

If you wanna JAM

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Anderson Cooper is the poster boy for American shit journalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

And for old money protecting it's own class interests.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

He’s also a shit friend who dropped Kathy Griffin like a hot rock the moment any controversy drifted her way.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're not wrong so i'll bring you back up to 0

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Back to 0 "Lemmy equivalent of Karma" score.

But now he's in the negatives again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh. Well, I don’t actually have voting visible so… I don’t really care what it is…… since I can’t see it! You should try it. It’s liberating.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like it. It's a good reminder that i've been scrolling too long when i start seeing posts that are in the negative.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Here, I’ll give you an upvote. I can’t see what it did… but the feature is there. Did it increase? Did it do nothing? I won’t ever know. But, you’ll know that something happened, and what’s more entertaining than watching a number increase?

;)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Charlie Manson probably wanted to rule the entire world, it wouldn't be discussed on the news every night seriously though, as a viable option, because Charlie had a swastika carved into his forehead.

This conversation speaks to the fact that trump also has a swastika carved into his head, it's just filled in with hair plugs and covered with expensive, orange, special-ordered Swedish makeup. CNN chooses not to see or acknowledge the swastika. They know it's there though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Just read the whole exchange... Goddamn he's spot on

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate this guy's stupid name. Y'all ain't no God.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because that's the point...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone who just hasn't heard of him before his interview with Kamala, could you tell me the point? Genuinely curious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because he brought up some very poignant talking points and this person mentions his name and decides to hone in on that rather than the substance of what is being said.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Oh, I misread your comment to say that he named himself that because he's not a god, like there was some back story or something!

Absolutely agree that what he said is more important than the stage name used when saying it