this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
348 points (94.4% liked)

Science Memes

11441 readers
1465 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 127 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If 90% of the population call them seagulls, and 99% of the population understand what you mean when you say "seagull", then yes, they are actually called seagulls

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's like what I say to bother botanists:

If half of the fruits with "berry" in their name don't fit your definition of berry, you need a new definition

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure botanists are aware that the same word can have different meaning outside of their scientific field. The people actually bothered by this are pedants who read about it on the internet, not people who studied botany.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A slight distinction:

The people actually bothered by this are the friends of pedants who read about it on the internet, not people who studied botany.

The pedants aren't bothered, they're elated they get to display faux superiority, I'm the one bothered by them!

Lol

[–] JackbyDev 4 points 2 months ago

Well, no, there's nothing wrong with the definition of berry, but there would be something wrong about a botanist being annoyed with someone using the colloquial definition of berry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What if I told you that words can have different meanings in different contexts? Just because the same word can be used to refer to different things depending on whether its used in everyday or scientific speech doesn't mean either usage is "wrong".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Context specific definitions are the bane of my autistic existence. Figuring out context is a waste of brainpower that could be better used having anxiety over situations that aren't going to happen.

/Completely serious, but not quite as strongly as worded here.

[–] groknull 2 points 2 months ago

So I take it no one should mention that in astrophysics anything heavier than helium is a metal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Doesn't change that it was a bad idea to borrow a generic term for small sweet fruits to refer to a specific botanical feature. Not just bad, but completely unnecessary and frankly, simply, a bit stupid.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Annoy naturalists with these other animal names too: Jellyfish, crawfish, starfish, Killer Whale, Canadian Geese, and American Buffalo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The buffalo thing pisses me off the most. Entire cultures are defined by that animal and it's incredibly significant to the history of the prairies and the continent as a whole. So it seems to me pretty disrespectful to go to these people and go "um actually what you've been calling this animal for centuries is wrong actually because Linnaeus or whatever"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Canada Goose

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Killer whale is orca which is a predatory whale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wtf who's beefing with starfish

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Should we add an exception when it comes to technical discussions?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're an ornithologist writing a scientific paper, you'd presumably be using a genus + species in Latin rather than any colloquial name anyway, while still acknowledging that they fall under the umbrella term "seagull" for most people. But I'm a descriptive linguist, rather than prescriptive, and that's really what this meme is about (it's not about seagulls)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Birds actually have scientific common names and it's completely acceptable to refer to them with those names. They even have standardized bird abbreviations using those names, like Red-tailed Hawk is RTHA. They of course use the latin names too, and those have their own abbreviations (Buteo jamaicensis is BUTJAM) but the common names are handier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a crow."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "crow family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.

So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people "call the black ones crows?" Let's get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.

Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that's not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you'd call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

mmmm, buttjam

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Noooo then how are we going to get memes like this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I enjoy having semi-serious discussions about nonsense like this, so I appreciate RubberElectron's reply calling me out

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 months ago (8 children)

The very first line of the Wikipedia entry on Gull says: "Gulls, or colloquially seagulls, are seabirds of the family Laridae in the suborder Lari. ". Colloquially speaking all gulls are seagulls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gull

The entry lists 54 species of Gull, and indeed from a pedantic perspective, none of their common names are "seagull". Nor are any of their binomial names Latin for "seagull". But there is Larus pacificus, either very calm or associated with the ocean of the same name. Also there is Larus atlanticus, and Larus Marinus (pretty dang close).

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as a Gull, is in fact, Sea/Gull, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Sea plus Gull. Gull is not an categorization unto itself, but rather another component of a full identity made useful by the kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species components comprising a full identification as defined by its scientific classification.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LOL, now do the Navy Gulls copypasta or "here's the thing..."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Something something jackgull

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

My fellow citizens, we got him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In Swedish Larus Marinus is called "Havstrut" which would translate to Seagull but I guess that doesn't count.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

50 species of gulls and every last one of them is a cunt.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Fucking love seagulls. Grew up at the beach, gulls everywhere. They used to dig in our trash cans and we had to put heavy weights on the lids. Still fucking love em. They're awesome, amazing trash birds who give zero fucks. I have seen gulls fully steal food from people's mouths. I've seen them sit on windshields and refuse to move so you can drive, including just allowing the wipers to fwap into them repeatedly.

Seagulls aren't cunts. Seagulls serve cunt, and I love them for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They most certainly are not. Make friends with one and they will bring you presents. https://lemmings.world/post/14253921

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've seen a gull eat a dead pigeon in the town square. I don't think I want their presents any more than the ones my cats think I do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Gulls have to eat.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia on Larus marinus, or the great black-backed gull:

The scientific name is from Latin. Larus appears to have referred to a gull or other large seabird. The specific name marinus means "marine", or when taken together, "sea gull".

If that's not a seagull I don't know what is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LoL, indeed it's not tho', it's the Great Black-Backed Gull. Damn those taxonomists!!!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but like, my dog is a dog but it's also a Labrador and also has a name. The great black-backed gull is also known as Larus marinus which means sea gull, and is also commonly referred to as a seagull. By what notion is that not a seagull?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By the simple minded notion of my sense of humor. ;-) Any more hares you'd like to split?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If we split a hare we'll both go hungry cause hares are small and I'm vegetarian

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Wow who said anything about eating it? You display it on the mantelpiece.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why does a seagull fly over the sea?

Because if they flew over the bay they would be bagels!

This joke echoes in my brain thanks to this one PBS commercial break snippet from my childhood. You're welcome

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I heard this joke for the first time a few weeks back on an episode of The Penguin. :D

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Achkchually, a pineapple is neither a pine, nor an apple.

It's actually an ananananas.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Bonjour, allô, salut!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Sure, but ananananas-pen doesn't have quite the same ring now does it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Do dooo do do do,

ananananas,

Do do do do

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

That anon's name? Steven Seagullible

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

From my experience, they're "Hanging around outside the chip shop" gulls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Now I know this, I will be crying every time I go to the ocean

load more comments
view more: next ›