this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
2816 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

I’m on board with the sentiment but are we really defending TikTok? I haven’t kept up on the issue but personally I wouldn’t cry if TikTok went away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We are not defending tiktok

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Didn't you know that if you criticize one thing it means the opposite is perfect and beyond reproach!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They aren't protecting you. They are protecting themselves from what you may give their enemies. Don't think just because the federal government is doing something "for the people" that nominally it's not about the government itself. National security is literally the government protecting itself by protecting its citizens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty much this! Also it is much easier and cheaper to tell Google to stop offering tiktok in their app store then it is to build affordable housing where it is needed..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Yea but where? There’s a push for it in my state. Drove past a new area that will be a neighborhood of cookie cutter SFH, probably with driveways too short to contain full size vehicles. And they’ll cost more than half a million so I’m not sure how that’s affordable. Anyway. It’s being built on the flood plain. 8/10 flood factor.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Ah yes, the obvious solution: more suburban blight.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Facebook sold personal data to a foreign organization called Cambridge Analytica who used it to influence our elections. If their motivations are to protect us via protecting themselves, why is Facebook not banned, and not even in the discussion of being banned?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wrong. They let Cambridge collect it on their platform. Huge difference.

The rest of your post is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Their justification for banning Tiktok is that it allows the Chinese government to collect on their platform. It's the same fucking thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

For one thing, today isn't 2015

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Did occurring in 2015 happen to make it less bad somehow? We sure as hell weren't passing laws to ban facebook back then either, so I'm not sure what point you think you've made.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We didn't have the same stance on data privacy back then as we do today. GDPR wouldn't be a thing for another year, not implemented for two more after that (2018). Legislators largely didn't understand the risks associated with unrestricted exchanges of seemingly benign user data at the time. Yay for hindsight being 20/20.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Hindsight and foresight are identical I always say

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And we should ban them too. I love this argument. We need better user data privacy laws, and this whataboutism does not change the fact that China is a hostile foreign nation.

I can appreciate that people view Google and Meta and so on as very similar in their transgressions. But as was pointed out in the original comment, this is a cost to benefit ratio type of analysis for the federal government and they gain more by keeping Meta and Google going and can enact other measures to prevent that from hurting them (usually reactionary), so to them this is fine. It is and always has been about what the US government can to do protect itself and enrich itself. Enrichment doesn't always come in the form of monetary value.

If you're upset at your own government (or government adjacent tech entities) gathering this type of data from users, you should be for banning them too, not keeping tik tok.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I am for severely restricting the ability for all corporations to gather and sell user data. You think I’m making a whattaboutism or whatever debate buzzword you want to conjure up; what I’m taking issue with is the argument that the reason they’re getting banned has anything to do with that data collection or “national security”. If that had any truth to it, Facebook would have gotten the same treatment, or at the very least would be in the conversation now since they do the same exact shit. If this was about data collection they would pass regulations about that instead of targeting one specific site to unilaterally ban.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"a genocide" LOL...this palestine propaganda is really getting out og hand. it is one of the many current genocides. russians wiping out cultures and nations, china on tibet or the uigurs, shit syria on aramaics and assyrians, fucking turkey on kurds and armenians. but yeah...it is "one" genocide now. kids are fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

You had me in the first part, NGL.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Watch? That would imply looking at the situation, so no I don't think that's quite the right word...

For one side it's more like "stand back and stand by", if you catch my drift, while for the other it's somewhat like claiming every four years to always have a ready supply of hot sauce stored in one's purse. (you see, a "purse" is a bag that we poors, specifically women, use to carry things - basically it's a nonmoving car where your butler puts all the "things" that you need for the entire day, except you are your own butler, and the purse doesn't drive to anywhere, and it gets heavy!)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Mostly agreed, but is anyone really getting minimum wage? Walmart pays double that to start in my little town.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Idaho has federal minimum and iirc laws preventing county or city minimums to be higher than the state minimum. Lots of service and farmhand jobs there are at minimum wage. One of the places I used to work was saught after in the town because they pay higher than minimum. I made $7.50/hr

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Go to places like KY, IN, TN, WV. Probably LA, and MS. They regularly start people @ minimum wage, and the rents are about 2/3 what I would pay in San Diego.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Then you should have voted blue, idiot. This situation exists because of apathy and antigovernment sentiment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

uhhhh, the blue that's currently in power?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Holding one of three branches is not "in power."

All spending bills have to originate in the republican controlled house. Anything the administration tries to do on it's own has to survive a heavily politicized Supreme Court. A Supreme Court that would be radically different without the Trump presidency. We'll be dealing with those Trump appointees for a generation and they'll do far more harm than he ever did. Not enough people voting blue in 2016 is going to have very long lasting consequences.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

House is 220 R to 212 D

Senate is 51 D (+I) to 49 R

The last time there was a Dem Supermajority was over a decade ago and it lasted about a month.

And the Supreme Court is stacked with Republicans with lifetime appointments.

But yes the blue currently in power that tried multiple times to cancel student loan debt, enshrine reproductive rights, protect and expand healthcare coverage, raise the minimum wage. The current blue that successfully ended several huge corporate mergers, fined companies for raising prices of goods, and has a housing plan to add 3 Million available units. Literally everything the meme cares about and more is as simple as voting correctly for your interests.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not the case but nice try, repub

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Not the case but nice try, random person from the internet

I'm not even an American. To my knowledge, democrats are currently in power. Other guys did a good job explaining the actual situation, you on the other hand...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Did Clinton ever undo all the load of crap Reagan and Bush gave us?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Clinton was 30 fucking years ago and Republicans have been stonewalling ever since then on every since one of these issues.

What the fuck are you talking about about????

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Clinton signed into law a whole raft of neoliberal policies that were started by Bush, and the cumulative effects of those policies over those decades are what we're feeling right now and what we warned about back then. The frogs have been boiled while the populace bickers about which neoliberal corporate shill sits on the puppet throne. They're after all our money and they're getting it by distracting us with the political circus and dividing us with wedge issues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Clinton is one the few presidents in the last 100 years that has operated on a SURPLUS. Meaning he’s the only president to lower the national debt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

"GAAAHHH! I CAN'T STICK A VACUUM CLEANER UP MY WOMB! I'M GOING TO DIE!!!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

My thoughts exactly

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

I think they are trying to be funny, but just coming across as an insensitive fuck gnat.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Cuz you already have 4 kids and can barely feed them, yes this but unironically and much less of an asshole.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When did they protect us from TikTok? They didn't. Other than that it would be a great point

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They're trying to get it shut down?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And I hope they succeed. But this has been talked about for 3-4 years now and hasn't happened

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It’s an actual case now though. They have until Jan 19 to sell US date to a US broker or else Apple and Google have 6 months from that date to remove it from the App Store.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Because its a threat to the military. Take all the time you need with this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Calling Republicans government...smh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Im down with the idea of social media being a threat to citizens for so long as the algorithms optimize for anger.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

On the other hand, I'm not sure I'd prefer another "opiate of the masses".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok but fuck tik Tok. Ban that shit. This comment is basically saying that banning tik Tok takes the same effort as giving your people healthcare.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Ok because I see a lot of stupid shit in here, you don't get to talk about banning tiktok if you don't talk about banning Instagram, Reddit, X and YouTube, who use the same formula, with equal fervour.

Now please talk about healthcare, climate crisis, the Palestinian ethnic cleansing by that cancerous, land grabbing, terrorist Israeli state and the shrinking buying power of the people all around the world.

load more comments
view more: next ›