this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5389 readers
3550 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, it is middle-eastern babies. Not like they're white babies or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, you're not supposed to say this out loud!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah. I can. They've BARELY lived. They might not even be sapient yet if you get them early enough. You can just make more and very little developmental progress would be lost. The resource impact is minuscule compared to the loss of full fledged, experienced, skilled, specialized adults. It's excusable AND I'M TIRED OF PRETENDING IT'S NOT.

Wait shit I thought we were only talking about white ones. Nevermind.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Finally someone on Lemmy is making sense. I'm not saying anyone should ever kill anyone else but, if you really had to for some reason, the most logical choices are the youngest and oldest people available. This of course assumes everyone is in decent health.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Huh... I thought that comment was so absurd that the /s wasn't necessarily. Guess I was wrong. Sorry mods.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, they're just babies. How good can they really even be at murdering? I'll give em a pass. Now a couple dozen murdering toddlers with knives? At that point we may have a problem. I'm pretty sure I could still take them, but I'll probably need stitches before it's over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You doing this barehanded? I'd at least give you a stick or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You give me a bat and they're going to be annihilated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I dig your style.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've completely lost the thread.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Israel attacked UN peacekeepers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Multiple times, voluntarily

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, how do you attack someone involuntarily? Or you mean voluntarily as in not by accident?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, perhaps "intentionally instead of accidentally".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pay no attention to the Hezbollah operated tunnel system near the compounds lookout tower.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Pay no attention to history. Israel is just loving the aftermath of the Oct 7 2023 attack. That attack was a gift. also Netanyahu gets to continue avoiding the consequences of his actions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is a difference though, and that is that while babies tend to be in the vicinity of adults, that could potentially be terrorists, you cannot make the same assumption (if you were to actually be make it in the former case) about uniformed and distinctly marked UN-peacekeepers that have their own bases. Attacking that letter can not be collateral damage or be an attack on potential terrorists, while the former could with a lot of mental gymnastics be legitimised (though not morally justified).

And let's be real, international diplomacy is the art of mental gymnastics at olympic level.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

you cannot make the same assumption (if you were to actually be make it in the former case) about uniformed and distinctly marked UN-peacekeepers that have their own bases.

Actually, that's exactly what the Israeli government did, they said they were trying to attack Hezbollah bases and the Peacekeepers should leave the area. And somehow, some people believe them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it was more along the lines of, "I'm not sure I believe they're actually targeting kids." And then, "oh my God the UN has video evidence of Israel targeting peace keepers."

I don't think most people are okay with killing kids. The hurdle is getting them to realize it is happening.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd believe that if it wasn't for all the video evidence of them killing kids, or the fact the average age in Gaza before the genocide was already under 16.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The point is people can hand waive a lot to feel better about the world they live in. I'm not going to complain because it took this other thing to get them to the realization. I'm just going to welcome them in. In fact this is the exact kind of meme I would run if I was trying to push people away from the BDS movement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can anyone not be sure, with all the videos, the reports from the NGO, hell even the bragging from the IDF

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Because it's contrary to the narrative they already believe. Facts don't change feelings. At least not at the pace they should.