this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19102 readers
2801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just vibes will win the presidency...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Just like always.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I don't like Harris very much. But the fact that half the country is willing to choose a deranged con artist over her is just beyond any rational thought.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rationality has nothing to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's all fear based. They think the migrants coming across the border are coming to take their job, rape them, break into their home, shop at the same Walmart as them, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I’m for all of that happening… to Republicans. ;)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've lately been watching some radio shows on the BBC, and it's wild to see the same things happening over there. I don't know if it's just how modern society has become or if it spread from us or them, but take away the British accents and the names and policies, and it's the same insanity. What the hell is wrong with people?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Russia created a network of wannabe autocrats, and they are pushing each other all across the globe.

That's it, that's most of all of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it isn't. It's hardly any of it. We exist in the same places they are targeting and it didn't turn us into complete goddamn idiots, so what's their excuse?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

They have always been racist, but the populists taking advantage of them use Russian tactics and are backed by Russia.

Stuff like Trump and Brexit is not normal, and it's not just happening spontaneously because all the racists decided to be more overt at the same time around the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to commend you for how well you did that. Absolutely beautiful ending with “shop at the same Walmart as them”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everything is fear based and not rationale.

Trump voters fear immigrants; Fear their guns, religion and identity are somehow being taken away. They fear and refuse to understand the world is constantly changing and that we need to adapt along with it.

Harris voters (rightly) fear trump and all the bigotry, racism, and misogyny he has enabled and emboldened.

Most of the American people don’t have something to vote for, only something to vote against. The ruling class is further detached for the working class by stoking culture wars gaslighting on the socioeconomic disparage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

They want Trump in because he represents an amoral outsider. Someone who is disenfranchised by the moralisms of the establishment left.

This is how they see themselves.

They like him because he's a shithead who doesn't care to preserve this system. They want change even if it's bad.

In this way pointing out that he's a shithead and a risk to democracy - helps him.

Unfortunately it's the Harris campaign's only option, as the alternative is to say: He's actually a highly connected establishment figure who will pull the same establishment shit we do. This would have obviously blow back for an establishment figure.

They want Trump BECAUSE he's a train wreck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Half the voting population, more specifically

Or I guess in this case, half of those polled

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That's what happen when you fuck your education system for money

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Either way we get Reagan's 12th term

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

You got downvotes, but I get your point. We still have scars from Reaganomics and other crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Polling is broken.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The media wants a race. That’s the only way they get viewers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or... it really is THAT close of a race. When we shrug it off as "the media just wants a race" we get complacent.

www.vote.gov make sure you're registered and double check even if you think you already are. Early voting is happening in some states. Get active

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Always vote like your vote will make a difference. It might, especially local races. If we accidentally turn the election into a sweep by everyone voting, oh well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who’s shrugging off anything? Did I say that? Nope. I’m just saying that we can have a close race and it still be true that Harris holds a 3-point lead nationally and small leads in the swing states. My point is that the media ALWAYS try making it even closer than what it is. Do you disagree with that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It could also be true that Trump holds a 3 point lead. It could go both ways.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It can be both things.

There are no definitive data points that should lead anyone to believe that either candidate has a significant advantage.

I'm not sure anyone who is well versed in election projections or polling would say anything other than it's a toss up. As a heavy consumer of said data and reporting, I haven't seen anything to the contrary.

You're not wrong about media incentives, but they're also not wrong that this is a very close race.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Thank you! That was point. It’s close. Harris holds a steady, yet small lead. The media will always make it seem closer than what it is though for ratings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Margin of error above 3%. Non-story.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not to mention, NBC ran the numbers with different turnout cases. In one of those cases, a very realistic but small few percentage point changes in turnout assumptions of different demographics could make the poll swing to 49% Harris to 46% Trump

How different turnout models change the NBC News poll results

Further, two other national polls released today showed the race as Harris+3. A lot of the dooming tends to be based on single polls. Yes the polls suggest race is close, but only paying attention to anything bad/mediocre isn't helpful either


Don't doom, take action instead

Make sure to register to vote. Deadlines are fast approaching in many states

Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you and online

Write letters to voters in swing states or in competitive downballot races

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Honestly, you can't trust the tv news polls. They want people to watch and Trump gets them numbers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

A) Has Biden markedly improved your day to day life or indicated a massive amount of progressive changes to the system?

B) Is the system likely to radically change away from corporate control/lobbying and towards a strong government agenda any time soon?

If you answered no to both these questions, you should understand why people want Trump in. He represents radical change, a concentration of government power in the executive branch. Sweeping changes under the guise of helping "real Americans" and harming the usual scapegoats (immigrants, gangs, socialists).

That's the thing; Harris has played towards a center that is greatly weakened/absent in times of political division (she's not selling herself as being a progressive change, like for instance Obama did with his HOPE campaign).

Where as Trump has played to the far-right, which is actually present and there in divided times like this.

You have to play to the side that's there if you want enthusiasm.

Harris didn't play towards progressives who want change (Bernie Sanders crowd). So they're only voting to prevent Trump's fascism, not because they actively expect sweeping progress from Harris (who champions establishment causes like border control and Israel).

She hasn't escaped Biden and the status-quo corporate grind. Trump has escaped his conscience about appearing centrist. Division serves him, counts against her, because she's playing to the absent center, where he's not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He represents radical change, a concentration of government power in the executive branch. Sweeping changes under the guise of helping “real Americans” and harming the usual scapegoats (immigrants, gangs, socialists).

While we know Trump is a conman, I would understand this as a rationale for those that didn't believe he was a conman, except we've already HAD 4 years of a Trump Presidency. If he was promising these great reforms for the little guy, why didn't he do any of them in the 4 years he was in office? Why do people think this time will be different?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not rational, it's based on feelings.

You're not dealing with rational fact based thinkers. You're dealing with people who see him as a proven common type person who shoots from the hip.

... and they don't mean he's common in that he's poor. They see him as honest/common/like them BECAUSE he shoots off hit takes and says things other politicians wouldn't.

That's why they love it qhen he says hlw crappy Detroit is IN Detroit. He's done similar in several cities now, and they see this as proof he's like them. They're down, he's down. They want to MAGA, he wants to MAGA.

The thing that stopped him last time was all these deep state lawsuits.

Again, these are not rational people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (8 children)

A dead heat in polling is not an even race. We know Democrats need a significant lead to be break even on election day.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

quick we must go even further right! - dnc strategists

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've seen some of Blue MAGA begging for George W Bush to endorse Harris. wtf.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

So you are one of those.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Blue MAGA? Wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WTF is "Blue MAGA"?

I don't see people on the left holding onto what was and getting stuck on reverting to times of old. Preventing the forward march of changing times.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's a laughable bad take.

The left, known for picking apart their candidates and platforms and fucking themselves by letting perfect the enemy of good repeatedly being called out as "cult-like".

I'm voting for Harris. But lemme tell you, I've got issues with her. Especially her history as "pro cop".

The thing is, many people on the left vote for "harm reduction". We know there's better candidates out there, but we're stuck with what we've got in the FPTP voting we have.

Objectively, voting for Harris will cause the least harm in this election.

Especially if our alternative is a ratfucking tyrant that wants to be a "dictator", wants to "ban protests", revoke the broadcast licenses of media outlets critical of him & his party, would authorize Israel to wipe out Gaza with our direct support of our troops, would consolidate wealth to the top, and is openly working with the deranged likes of a man that dreams of making his workers indentured servants and would push the USA to reflect apartheid South Africa to relive the glory his father did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Democrats keep conceding right -leaning policies as if Republicans actually just want those policies

Republicans are reactionary - they don't just want tougher immigration policies. they want to hurt immigrants. If democrats push right, Republicans will just go further.

There is no moderate right-wing position the can win over moderate Republicans that they can't just beat by going further right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please note the momentum shift that started just around the DNC convention. Ask yourself what changed in the Harris campaign at that time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Not even giving them the click. I know who I'm voting for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

538 has Trump's support at his 2016 final levels. This is relevant to note because, in both prior elections, the polls were extremely good at predicting the baseline margins from diehards and registered, and the error came from badly guessing the undecideds wrong.

Unless this is the first election in a long long time to actually get the baseline wrong or literally 100% of the undecideds go to Harris, Trump's got above 2016 in raw percentage totals basically locked in(in 2016 a ton of people went third party so neither he or Hillary actually crossed 50 percent, Hillary was 48.2 and Trump 46.1). In 2020 it was 46.8 for Trump and 51.3% for Biden. If things continue to trend that way Trump will be close to his 2020 total percentage locked in and thus will almost certainly be higher in the final count. The people genuinely leaving Trump will mostly be former undecideds, not the people locked in, so this number isn't being shifted as much. That does suggest that, even with his general ceiling region not shifting a ton, he's probably set to break 47% in the final number if not more (Trump was polling sub-45 in both 2016 and 2020 so 48 is also plausible).

This matters mostly because not every undecided is going to break for Harris or Trump, there will be people sticking third party who most polls lump in with them or at least contribute to the 'Not Harris or Trump' number, and this is one of the few areas where the general trend is not in Harris's favor. Just broadly speaking this is the most left-wing Third Party batch we've had since 2000.

As much as people love to say voting third party helps Republicans, that hasn't been the case in a while, the Libertarians have been the strongest for a long while and they usually siphon off more Republicans, especially Anti-Trump Ron Paul types. They probably cost Trump Georgia in 2020. But the Libertarian party has been in a state of collapse since 2022, there was an attempted takeover by a hard right clique, which lead to a nasty party schism that left the party not cooperating, then a ton of Hardliners defected to Trump when the Moderates got control of the primaries, and then to make matters worse RFK joined in around that time taking most of the right wing moderates and leaving the Left Libertarians to put Chase Oliver on the ticket. So a ton of Libertarian voters either left with the hardliners for Trump a year ago or left for RFK who in turn endorsed Trump likely redirecting some more of them to him, and what's left is the most Left-Wing Libertarian the party has run since the 1970s.

Then there's the fact the Constitution Party has been steadily weakening for years, they lost their status as the Number 3 Third Party in 2020 to the PSL, and this year they had a schism between the Mormon and Protestant factions. They also mostly take Republican Votes. Or the fact the usual coalition of small right wing parties all working together to back one candidate(Rocky De Le Fuente last time) are all gone. Why? They all hitched to RFK Jr, and he dropped out too late for any of them to pick new guys. (That I honestly suspect was the real goal of his candiacy. Wipe out the small right wing third parties and weaken the Libertarians).

On the other foot, the Greens are proportionally stronger as Jill Stein has better name recognition than Howie, the Party for Socialism and Liberation is surging with youth support and is set to break their all time record again, and Cornel West...exists.

It could be far worse, lawsuits kept most of them off of most Swing States, Nevada kept the Green Party off and has the Constitution Party, and Pennsylvania and Arizona only have the Greens and Libertarians. Wisconsin and Michigan also still have RFK Jr on them despite Cornel West and Claudia being there. But it's still way more left leaning than normal just from the Libertarian crisis and lack of small right parties even without those new guys.

Let's say around 1.5% of the undecideds go Third Party. Lower than 2020, way way lower than 2016, about on parr with previous years. It's going to be mostly people who would otherwise vote democrat. The Popular Vote to Electoral College margin is supposed to be quite a bit less this year, but sub-Hillary margins nationally are probably a loss. So Harris wants a 2 point lead and there's around 98.5% available. It's gonna be tight.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

TL:DR The lower number of undecideds also means that less of them need to break for Trump to give a win, even with the gap between Popular Vote and Electoral College predicted to shrink significantly. Polls have been very accurate at predicting the baseline support, it's the undecideds they suck at guessing.

Trump's baseline just hit 46.1%, 2016 final levels(not 2016 baseline that was barely 40%, big difference) and at the rate it's slowly creeping up could be at or close to 2020 final levels, 46.8%. Harris has been stuck at 48 and a half points for a bit. Assuming this trend holds another 4 weeks we're looking at something like 48.8 to 46.8 baseline nationally or in that general area. Some of those undecideds are going for third parties, likely more left leaning ones.

All that accounting for if Trump wins just half the undecideds the final result gap would be around 2 points, similar to 2016 if not slightly smaller, which is probably a Trump win. He's converted enough to diehards he's gone from needing 2/3+ to just half. And Trump won with the undecideds both prior elections. Harris is improving, absolutely, but the changing third party situation is a braking factor absorbing and neutralizing it to a degree(in 2020 and especially 2016 Trump was bleeding more votes to guys like Gary Johnson, Jo Jorgenson, Rocky De Le Fuente, and Evan McMullin. This year the third party composition has shifted left thanks to the rise of the PSL, strengthing of the Greens, RFK Jr killing the small right wing bloc, and Libertarian infighting.). So this change was a net negative and Harris's growth has been somewhat absorbed in neutralizing this. That's also probably why Trump's raw base total is up, among other things a lot of hardliner Hoppean or Rothbardian LIbertarians jumped ship to him when Chase Oliver and the moderates won the party.

Take a swing state for example. Less accurate overall, but just a hypothetical, and it's a clean "get the most votes and it's yours" so no need to guess ratios. According to 538, There's 4 and a half points not locked in, Harris is leading by 0.4-0.7 and it's fluctuating day to day. Pennsylvania isn't a super 3rd party happy state compared to some of the sunbelt, and PSL and Cornel didn't get on, so that's a bit more favorable. Let's say 1 point goes to third party, a bit more Harris thanks to the internal shifts, but not by much. Of of the remaining 3.5, if 63% were to go to Trump, that's it, even with the best case 0.8 point base lead Harris loses. If it's more like 0.4 Trump just needs around 55% of the undecideds. That's it. And this state is better in the third party spread than some others. Trump won more than those numbers from them the last two elections.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (19 children)

It boggles the mind that this sack of shit is even in the running.

He has the charisma of a wet sponge (and the appearance of someone you'd think twice before buying a used car from), he can hardly string together a sentence (let alone hold a speech), hi lies, he commits fraud, he's a convicted felon..

That's hardly brushing the surface, yet people go "fuck yeah, this guy should run the country".

Jeebuz fuckin christ.. what's happening?

Unless you got home schooled by Heinrich Himmler, there's no excuse. You can't possibly offer your political support to such a scumbag.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't watch a lot of TV, so I don't see ads much, but just saw an ad from the turnip who was railing against they/them pronouns....the level of hate from the turnips is insane. It's like if Hitler was running and railing against jews. How is this shit allowed on tv...next he's gonna be saying minorities should be hung.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›