this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3218 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Really glad the president of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It's right next to the Gas Price Dial on the Resolute desk.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It's right next to the gas price slider. Duh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My apologies

Really glad the ~~president~~ knob of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Axios:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.axios.com/2024/10/10/cpi-report-september-inflation-economy
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now pay me more and we're good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are you asking Lemmy? Wage growth has been outpacing inflation. You should be getting on that train yourself if you want it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm a teacher. Don't come at me with that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then your union is negotiating it if they’re of any value. All the teachers unions around me negotiated 14-25% raises over 3 years over the last few years. If you’re a younger teacher you should look to job hop though. If you’re tenured you’re sorta stuck. In my area there’s three districts of the like 40~ I always push people that are new to end up in as once tenured in them you’ll earn well over 6 figures, even at the elementary level.

Source: former education and still friends with my teacher colleagues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The union is currently negotiating. It's a strong union. I'm in year 5. I've been looking around, but my position is highly sought after (PE Teacher) and the good positions go to people with much more experience. Also, I like where I'm at. It's a low income area. The parents and admin let me do my thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Low income is also better in uncertain budget times as Title 1 funds make sure they have both fed and state funds. Here in Cali our property taxes mean that the schools in poor areas are the most well funded and the schools in rich older areas are the least well funded. Just with variations on what “rich” means here too.

If you have a state pension system too don’t forget to look into how that works for your district. There are some in my area that actually don’t pay the full percentage so teachers have a worse retirement than if they went to a different district with slightly less pay. So it’s all about the long game.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That's still 2.4% on top of the cumulated inflation of the past 5 years...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure. But inflation is down, we didn't go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

This is good, we're going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

We should raise the minimum wage until it is commensurate with the price gouging. All at once, since none of the corporations eased us into higher prices.

But we have zero parties in this country that are willing to raise the minimum wage at the national level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

You misspelled price gouging.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah but unfortunately that's never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

It's never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Line must go up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, it will never go negative (I hope) because if it goes negative we're probably in for a massive global recession that will introduce untold suffering.

You think they aim for 2% because that's what's good for rich people? 2% is the magic number for the whole economy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Who taught you that? Remember, economists funded by rich people have obvious biases... And what happens if our salaries and pensions are indexed to the cost of living? Is the reasoning still good?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Just learned I was funded by rich people. Did I miss a paycheck somewhere?

-an actual economist, telling you deflation is bad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aaaand now we get to the "don't trust the experts, they're all liars" phase

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You want a deflationary environment? Are you sure?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That's what you got from my one line comment?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If "deflationary environment" is neoliberal for "restrictions on and immediate reduction of the current ongoing price gouging" then call me Moleman cuz yes, i want that, right now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, well, no, it's not. Do you want actual deflation?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I need you to eat my entire sittin muscle. Dont say you don't want to, i can see you enjoy doing it by how you talk. Its a chore speaking with you often i bet.

get to chewing

Dagum smug ass no thinking neoliberals... Always sound like the same 20 something middle manager haha

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Economy still sucks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Food prices are still up twenty to forty percent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right! and now, amazing news! Our expenses are only growing at a rate of only 2.4%!! Hooray?!?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

2% is actually pretty good and about what you want. Maintaining flat spending power sounds great on paper, but also puts an economy at increased risk of recession and citizens at increased risk of ballooning debt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (8 children)

That's nice and all, but wages didn't not increase year over year for most people, so most people would prefer those risks and be able to continue living, instead of helping to balloon the suicide statistic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Most people are not economists. Most people would like everyone to be given $100,000 and a pony (or just white people, if you're a republican).

2% inflation is good. But an inflation number doesn't tell us where the gains are accruing. Ensuring gains go to workers and not capital is an entirely separate goal of the government.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

We're taking about the consumer price index here. Inflation regarding the cost of living only. This is, as i hinted previously, heavily caused not by "inflation" (as youd consider it in econ 101) but corporate price-gouging.

Corporate price-gouging is i feel i must add capital N Not inflation in the traditional sense... But in the scope of this article and our conversation, it is.

So again, fucking-A yes I want price gouging to stop, right now.. So like, if you wish to continue wit me we need to agree on terms. Let me know you agree this cpi definition and inflation in this case is "price gouging" otherwise we may as well just part ways

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed. I’m talking about deflation though. The debts you acquire balloon in size, even without interest, during deflation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think we do agree. As you can see in the chart, our debts have been ballooning under inflation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's total debt, he's talking about individual debt. Deflation is bad. This is not really up for debate. 2% inflation is a fine target and worked well for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Waiting to see the creative ideas Republicans come up with to try to tank it before November

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's great the prices aren't going up more. Now go get all of these companies that are price gouging. It's great to protect people from it during natural disasters but unfortunate the government didn't consider COVID a natural disaster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Oh they are still going up, just not as much.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I saw this when I opened Edge for work this morning. Two worlds in one picture.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Yay people got fucked over bad, but they can take a water break before resuming the ass railing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Too bad it's not on food prices

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Haters will say it’s because of the election coming up

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While this is good news, remember that this means that prices are still increasing due to inflation, just at a slower rate now. It does NOT mean that inflation has been reversed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›